ethics of mental health research n.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Ethics of Mental Health Research

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

Ethics of Mental Health Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Ethics of Mental Health Research. Q1: ways in which mental health differs. Definition of mental illness is problematic. Terminology is very broad and inconsistent Diagnosis is difficult and can be a socio- or political- construction Awareness of possible cultural factors

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Ethics of Mental Health Research' - raven-simmons

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
q1 ways in which mental health differs
Q1: ways in which mental health differs
  • Definition of mental illness is problematic. Terminology is very broad and inconsistent
  • Diagnosis is difficult and can be a socio- or political- construction
  • Awareness of possible cultural factors
  • Patients are potentially more vulnerable
  • These factors lead to…
    • Greater need for clear inclusion/exclusion criteria
    • Special attention to assess diagnostic criteria that have been used?
    • ..need Psychiatrist on REC or trust Psych investigator?
  • Possible lack of awareness of patient of illness and implications of intervention
q1 discussion vulnerability
Q1: discussion - vulnerability
  • NB assumption of extra vulnerability – is this function of mental illness, or of loss of capacity. Ie why does mental illness necessarily imply vulnerability where patient has capacity.
    • Vulnerability arising from representation by a third party
    • Vulnerability function of dependency
    • Vulnerability arising from poor judgement
q2 ethical implications for research of lack loss of capacity
Q2: Ethical implications for research of lack/loss of capacity
  • Research has to be directly relevant to that population and not be possible with patients with capacity, so…
  • Special justification needed for studies that are not specifically targetted at the condition leading to incapacity, but…
  • Should incapacitated patients be excluded from research that could benefit all sectors of population – eg treatment of heart disease / patients with Downs Syndrome
  • This group is different to general population, but take care not to ‘over-protect’
  • Lack of capacity should not be assumed in patients with even severe mental illness – capacity can be variable and should be assessed independently of the illness
  • Need clear understanding of legal definition of competence and implications for assessing capacity
  • How can we be confident that the legal representative can know wishes or represent best interests of the patient?
  • Consider issues of confidentiality in respect of legal rep.
q2 capacity discussion
Q2: capacity - discussion
  • If a court has declared a person incompetent, but we consider that they have capacity for this purpose, can they enter trial?
  • REC needs to examine protocols to consider inclusion/exclusion criteria in terms of capacity / competence / representation
  • Particular questions about use of placebo?
  • Questions of conflicts of interest:
    • Role of pharmaceutical sponsor, payments
    • Especially where there may be a dependent relationship with clinician
q3 special precautions where people have diminished capacity
Q3: Special precautions where people have diminished capacity
  • Important for legal representative to be independent of researcher / sponsor
  • REC to examine protocol for how ‘best interests’ will be considered
  • Is there a greater need for ongoing inspection / audit / monitoring / scrutiny?
  • How to monitor practice of decision-making rather than just the SOP
  • What if legal rep consents, but patient is resistant
q4 issues in developing under resourced countries
Q4: Issues in developing / under-resourced countries
  • Sponsor of research – what is their role / interest. More vulnerable population – needs extra attention.
  • Poor quality of local standard of care in – entry in any trial could be seen as a benefit – ie always in best interests to enter study!
  • Attention to risk of inducement in view of poverty
  • Post-trial position if drugs are successful or addictive
  • [Not unique to mental health, but issues might be more sensitive, especially as MH provision is particularly badly served in developing countries]
  • Identifying decision-maker(s) and cultural factors in considering individual/family interests
  • Competence of local doctors to participate
q4 measures to address issues in developing countries
Q4 : measures to address issues in developing countries
  • Capacity (ie resource) to manage issues is limited, so take extra cautionary approach as default, despite potential risk of exclusion from beneficial research?
  • Dedicated training modules to mental health research
  • Specialised committee for MH research proposals – if possible and workable