1 / 22

An Experimental Comparison of Bibliometric Mapping Techniques

An Experimental Comparison of Bibliometric Mapping Techniques. Nees Jan van Eck , Ludo Waltman, Rommert Dekker Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands {nvaneck,lwaltman,rdekker}@few.eur.nl Jan van den Berg Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands j.vandenberg@tudelft.nl

rasha
Download Presentation

An Experimental Comparison of Bibliometric Mapping Techniques

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Experimental Comparison of Bibliometric Mapping Techniques Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Rommert Dekker Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands {nvaneck,lwaltman,rdekker}@few.eur.nl Jan van den Berg Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands j.vandenberg@tudelft.nl 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators Vienna, September 18, 2008 1 1 1 1

  2. Bibliometric mapping

  3. Bibliometric mapping

  4. Data sets • Journals in economics, management, and operations research • 2001-2005 • ISI categories: business; business, finance; economics; management; and operations research & management science • 376 journals • Terms in computational intelligence • 2001-2005 • 337 terms

  5. Similarity measures • Other names for the association strength • probabilistic affinity index • proximity index

  6. Mapping techniques • Ordinal MDS in SPSS PROXSCAL • VxOrd (DrL) • VxOrd1: top 10 similarities, edge cutting (default settings) • VxOrd2: all similarities, no edge cutting • VxOrd3: top 10 similarities, no edge cutting

  7. Evaluation criteria

  8. MDS – Jaccard index (journals)

  9. VxOrd1 – cosine (journals)

  10. VxOrd2 – cosine (journals)

  11. VxOrd3 – cosine (journals)

  12. VOS – association strength (journals)

  13. Comparison of maps (journals) • MDS clearly performs worst, with no good separation between journals from different fields • As is typical for MDS, journals are located more or less uniformly distributed within a circle • VxOrd3 and VOS perform quite well, with a clear clustering of journals based on their field 13

  14. Robustness and efficiency (journals) • MDS and VxOrd1 have a low robustness and efficiency • The other techniques do much better 14

  15. MDS – Jaccard index (terms)

  16. VxOrd1 – cosine (terms)

  17. VxOrd2 – cosine (terms)

  18. VxOrd3 – cosine (terms)

  19. VOS – association strength (terms)

  20. Comparison of maps (terms) 20

  21. Robustness and efficiency (terms) 21

  22. Conclusions • No complete specification of VxOrd is available in the literature 22

More Related