1 / 14

New COSMO Procedure

New COSMO Procedure. COSMO General Meeting, Zürich 19-23 September 2005. Background. Feedback from WPC meeting: --> lack of man power --> lack of discipline Cooperation and (friendly) Competition between consortia needed. New Structure / working procedures.

ralphg
Download Presentation

New COSMO Procedure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New COSMO Procedure COSMO General Meeting, Zürich 19-23 September 2005

  2. Background • Feedback from WPC meeting: --> lack of man power --> lack of discipline • Cooperation and (friendly) Competition between consortia needed

  3. New Structure / working procedures • Definition LM Strategy (STC, Input by Science Advisory Committee, SAC). Horizon: 5 years. • SAC = WP coordinators + SPM • SAC suggests Themes for Projects  1-3 per WG project outline (< 1 page) 1-3 per WG  SPM/STC defines form und content of outline (template) SAC prioritises list.

  4. New Structure / working procedures • STC chooses one-digit number of projects. Assigns PL • PL formulates Project. Split up into tasks (incl. duration and expenses) • COSMO Members: declare, which of the tasks they want to work on this counts for the 2 FTE / year a member must offer work that is not performed within the priority projects is welcome but does not count for the 2 FTE/year

  5. Attribution of Ressourcees The two FTE contributions from each COSMO member will be devoted to: 1) Research and Development Priority Projects: 2) Management of Support

  6. Time line • Draft strategy end of August

  7. Time line • Draft strategy end of August • Collection of proposals SAC meeting (1/2 Sept ‘05)

  8. Time line • Draft strategy end of August • Collection of proposals SAC meeting (1/2 Sept ‘05) • GM (WG parallel meet): fine tuning GM (Thursday night): priority list

  9. Time line • Draft strategy end of August • Collection of proposals SAC meeting (1/2 Sept ‘05) • GM (WG parallel meet): fine tuning GM (Thursday night): priority list • Selection of Projects GM, last day (STC)

  10. Time line • Draft strategy end of August • Collection of proposals SAC meeting (1/2 Sept ‘05) • GM (WG parallel meet): fine tuning GM (Thursday night): priority list • Selection of Projects GM, last day (STC) • Detailed project plan November 1

  11. Time line • Draft strategy end of August • Collection of proposals SAC meeting (1/2 Sept ‘05) • GM (WG parallel meet): fine tuning GM (Thursday night): priority list • Selection of Projects GM, last day (STC) • Detailed project plan November 1 • Approval STC November 15 (written procedure)

  12. Time line • Draft strategy end of August • Collection of proposals SAC meeting (1/2 Sept ‘05) • GM (WG parallel meet): fine tuning GM (Thursday night): priority list • Selection of Projects GM, last day (STC) • Detailed project plan November 1 • Approval STC November 15 (written procedure) • Attribution of resources byCOSMO members December meeting STC

  13. Draft strategy Longer-term perspectives (3-5 years) 1. High-resolution, short-range EPS available optimally: each COSMO member contributes 2 ensemble members 2. Assimilation of ‘all’ available data sfc / profiles / radar / satellites… high resolution also slowly-changing information (soil moisture, vegetation state, etc) 3. LM performance is known and critically discussed example of ECMWF includes dissemination of results

More Related