html5-img
1 / 26

ZERO WASTE ECONOMICS Think Globally, Pay Locally

ZERO WASTE ECONOMICS Think Globally, Pay Locally. Sound Resource Management Seattle, Washington, USA jeff.morris@zerowaste.com. I. In the Marketplace Recycling Dances to the Tune of Virgin Commodity Prices. Aluminum Ingot vs. Recycled Cans.

qabil
Download Presentation

ZERO WASTE ECONOMICS Think Globally, Pay Locally

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ZERO WASTE ECONOMICSThink Globally, Pay Locally Sound Resource Management Seattle, Washington, USA jeff.morris@zerowaste.com

  2. I. In the MarketplaceRecyclingDances to the TuneofVirgin Commodity Prices

  3. Aluminum Ingot vs. Recycled Cans

  4. Unbleached Softwood Kraft Pulp vs. Recycled Cardboard

  5. Polyethylene Terephthalate Pellets vs. Recycled PET Bottles

  6. II. Recycling’s Societal Value Is Greater Than Its Marketplace Value

  7. Calculating Recycling’s Environmental Value • Quantify Life-cycle Material, Energy and Pollutant Inputs and Outputs • Estimate Environmental Impacts of Inputs and Outputs • Estimate Economic Costs of Environmental Impacts, or Rank Impacts via Some Other Numerical or Qualitative Measure

  8. III. Virgin-Content Products Use More Energy ThanRecycled-Content Products(Upstream Benefit of Recycling)

  9. Energy Used for Resource Acquisition & Product Manufacturing

  10. IV. Curbside Recycling Saves More Energy Than It Uses to Collect, Process and Market Recycled Materials

  11. Recycling per Curbside Available Household in Washington

  12. Curbside Recycling in Washington Energy Used vs. Conserved

  13. V. Curbside Recycling Saves More Pollution Than It Generates to Collect, Process and Market Recycled Materials

  14. Pollution Reductions from Recycling • Avoided Pollution from Virgin Resource Extraction & Virgin-Content Manufacturing (upstream external benefits) • Minus: Pollution from Recycled-Content Manufacturing (upstream external costs) • Avoided Pollution from Garbage Collection, Transfer & Disposal (waste management external benefits) • Minus: Pollution from Curbside Collection, Processing & Shipping (waste management external costs)

  15. WA Curbside Recycling vs.DisposalGreenhouse Gas Reductions

  16. WA Curbside Recycling vs. DisposalAcidification Potential Reductions

  17. WA Curbside Recycling vs. DisposalEutrophication Potential Reductions

  18. VI. Waste Management & External Environmental Costs Avoided by Recycling>Costs Incurred byCurbside Recycling

  19. Net Externalized Environmental Benefit of Curbside Recycling • Avoided External Costs from: • Virgin-Content Products (pollution from virgin resource extraction & virgin-content manufacturing) • Garbage Collection, Transfer & Disposal (pollution from garbage management) • Less: Increased External Costs from: • Recycled-Content Products (pollution from recycled-content manufacturing) • Curbside Collection, Processing & Shipping (pollution from recyclables management)

  20. Net Cost of Curbside Recycling • Curbside Recycling Collection, Hauling, Processing & Shipping Costs • Less Revenue & Avoided Garbage Costs: • Revenue from recyclables • Avoided Garbage Disposal Costs • Avoided Garbage Collection & Transfer Costs

  21. Australian Kerbside Study: Recycling Costs Amount to Just 38% of Dollar Value of Net Environmental Benefits • Environmental Benefits: • 75% from upstream air & water pollution decreases • 21% from upstream land use reductions & future resource access improvements • 4% from global warming credits • 2% from reduced land use for landfills • Environmental Costs: • 2% from increased truck traffic

  22. WA Curbside Recycling vs. Landfilling: Net Internalized Costs vs. Net Externalized Benefits

  23. WA Curbside Recycling vs. Waste-to-Energy: Net Internalized Costs vs. Net Externalized Benefits

  24. External Cost of Air Pollutants(US$ per pound)

  25. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Allowance Trading (average monthly prices)

  26. External Cost of Water Pollutants(US$ per pound)

More Related