What are the guidelines to write a biomedical literature review for a manuscript? - Pubrica

1. What are the Reporting Guidelines to be Followed While Writing a Biomedical Literature Review for a Manuscript Dr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica sales@pubrica.com In Brief In short, a manuscript literature review provides a critical assessment of the sources (literature) you have gathered and read surrounding your subject area and then identifies a "gap" in that literature that your research will attempt to address. A literature review may also involve in a summary of key sources. Still, review usually has aregulatory pattern and incorporatesboth summary and synthesis, often within specific theoretical categories. Research guideline for biomedical literature review is not an easy work for a manuscript, and Pubrica has experts to focus on biomedical literature review providing a high quality of Writing and helps to publish in international journals also. Keywords: Medical services, manuscript academic manuscript manuscript services, edit my manuscript, journal manuscript manuscript English editing services, how to write your paper, English editing scientific manuscripts, scientific manuscript editing, scientific editing companies, plagiarism correction. I. INTRODUCTION A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other expert relevant to an article issue, field of research, or theory so as to provide information, summary, evaluation of these works about the research issues being searched. Literature reviews are written to provide an overview of sources you have analysed while researching a particular topic and to determine your readers how your research fits within a larger field of study. II. STEPS IN PREPARING A LITERATURE REVIEW 1. Regulate which manuscript writings are commonly allowed to be significant and acquire access to them. 2. As you gather each of these works, take notes on The author's field of ability and recognition. The types of information the author focussed on (e.g., case studies, narratives, statistics, primary sources) and the accuracy of this evidence. The author's angle. The author's dispute (indicating which are most convincing and which are less so). The author's input to the scholarly discussion of the topic. 3. Once you are adequately familiar with the original works you have examined, look for arrangement among them. Regulate how they compare and contrast. III. REPORTING GUIDELINES OF BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE REVIEW The Introduction provides the understanding of your topic and gives a brief preview of the tendency you have determined in the academic manuscript editing of the paper. The body involves more major information about notable comparison and characteristic, points of arrangement and disarrangement, trends you have detected. Usethe best a literature manuscript editing editing, editing services, best editing services, and critical Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 1

2. 4.Use subheadings, specifically in lengthy reviews 5.Use passages to help trace your argument 6.If your topic teaches across development, consider analysis studies from each subject separately 7.Check the flow of your dispute for unity. VI. BENEFITS OF LITERATURE REVIEW By compiling previous research on a topic, literature reviews have various benefits. These include: manuscript service team to introduce and clarify these relations among the independent scholarly works you have investigated. Literature reviews help readers explain what is known about a problem without having to find and read throughdifferent expert on journal manuscript editing services. Literature reviews help "set the stage" for nextlearning about new research on a given topic (such as if they are arranged in the Introduction of a larger research paper). In alternative words, they afford valuable background and context. Literature reviews can also provide advice the writer learn about a given topic while qualifying the report itself. The conclusion contributes to an analysis of what is known and thought about the topic and what is left to explore. IV. LENGTH OF A LITERATURE REVIEW In the absence of a specific report about the range of a literature review, astandard guideline of thumb is that it will be corresponding to the length of your entire paper. If your article is 15 pages long, 2-3 pages might suit for the literature review, and there should provide no plagiarism correction. V. DEVELOPMENT OF LITERATURE REVIEW 1.Near the beginning of an investigation, state out especially what will and will not be hidden. 2.Define your point of view initially in the report: this serves as the thesis statement of the review. 3.Aim for a bright and cohesive essay that integrates the essential details of the literature and communicates your point of view. VII. CONCLUSION As biomedical research, no matter how dramatic the results are not complete until the results are published. In summary, the primary purpose of writing a useful literature review in biomedical research is to afford a sequential on published articles to evaluate and analyse the body of the proposed study. Biomedical research allows to study medicine issues and problems using different techniques, and it is essential to define the literature gap and need for the present study. To lessor your pressure and produce quality literature review section, our experts will support you during this process in biomedical research article writing without any mistakes. Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 2

3. REFERENCES 1. Galvan. (2006). Writinga literature review: a guide for students of the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: pyrczak publishing. Chipperfield L, Citrome L, Clark J, et al. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1967– 82 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2011. [Accessed on 24/10/2012] Maggio LA, Tannery (2011) Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews. Pautasso M (2010) Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases. 2. 3. 4. NH, Kanter SL 5. Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 2