1 / 15

Skopje, May 2008 Ana Admcevska

REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE. PREPARATION, ORGANISATION AND CONDUCTING OF THE POST- ENUMERATION SURVEY IN THE STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA. Skopje, May 2008 Ana Admcevska. Introduction – Census 2002.

prisner
Download Presentation

Skopje, May 2008 Ana Admcevska

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE PREPARATION, ORGANISATION AND CONDUCTING OF THE POST- ENUMERATION SURVEY IN THE STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, May 2008 Ana Admcevska

  2. Introduction – Census 2002 • The last Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia was conducted from 1st to 15th November 2002. • The Census methodology,organization and management were according to the international standards and the UN recommendations .

  3. Necessity of Post-enumeration Survey To control exhaustivness and quality of Census data, the SSO organized an independent Post - enumeration Survey (PES) what gave opportunity to estimate coverage and reliability of the Census, as well as to discover some possible errors.

  4. Methodological principles • PES is an independent survey; • PES should be conducted immediately after the CENSUS, in a short period of time; • PES is a sample survey; • In PES should be used the same definitions and classifications as in the Census; • For PES should be used the Census resources; • The PES data should be matched and compared to the Census data.

  5. IMPLEMENTATION OF POST-ENUMERATION SURVEY • Activities prior to the data collection; • Activities performed on field; • Activities after the data collection.

  6. Activities after the data collection • Matching data - Commissions, consisted of appointed member from the local authorities, the instructor( field supervisor) and the controller (enumerator for PES), were responsible for matching data - These Commissions found the corresponding households from the Census for every of the 80 selected Enumeration Districts (ED) and....

  7. Matching data ...filled in with census data the columns in the PES forms designed for this purpose; • By this activity of matching and comparing the PES and the Census data were discovered equalities and differences between the PES and the Census; • Writing reports (controllers and instructors).

  8. Data Processing • Detailed control of the filled in PES forms and analysis of the instructor’s reports; • Entry and processing of the PES materials; • The calculations of all statistics were done using ordinary estimation model for stratified cluster sample in SAS software package.

  9. Analysis of the results • Analysis of the instructor’s reports; • Analysis of the processed PES data.

  10. 1. Analysis of instructor’s reports By analyzing instructor’s report we can conclude: • That some part of the population had negative deportment to the second visits of controllers and the repeated enumeration of the households, resulting in refusing of PES in 4 EDs...

  11. 1. Analysis of instructor’s reports • That the good field work strongly depends on: • Clear description and punctually drawn ED boundaries; • Size of the EDs; • Selection, training and commitment of the controllers (enumerators ).

  12. 2. Analysis of the processed PES data By analyzing the processed PES datawe can conclude: • The Census population was underestimated by 1,4 %; • The variables for ethnical affiliation were with highest quality, without discrepancy between the Census and the PES data;

  13. 2. Analysis of the processed PES data • The variables for economic status were not with so good quality, especially there were discrepancies between the Census and the PES data in the variables “self employed” and “unpaid family worker” in rural strata; • The section with agricultural items for households was incorrectly responded both in the Census and in the PES.

  14. General conclusion The Census 2002 was with good coverage and the biggest part of the Census items were with good quality. Some of them, like the agricultural items were insufficiently responded, which was additional reason for planning and conducting the Agricultural Census in June 2007.

  15. QUESTIONS? Thank you for your attention

More Related