Issues in the practical application of data mining techniques to pharmacovigilance
Download
1 / 16

Issues in the Practical Application of Data Mining Techniques to Pharmacovigilance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 183 Views
  • Uploaded on

Issues in the Practical Application of Data Mining Techniques to Pharmacovigilance. A. Lawrence Gould Merck Research Laboratories May 18, 2005. Spontaneous AE Reports. Clinical trial safety information is incomplete Few patients -- rare events likely to be missed

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Issues in the Practical Application of Data Mining Techniques to Pharmacovigilance' - prisca


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Issues in the practical application of data mining techniques to pharmacovigilance l.jpg

Issues in the Practical Application of Data Mining Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

A. Lawrence Gould

Merck Research Laboratories

May 18, 2005


Spontaneous ae reports l.jpg
Spontaneous AE Reports Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

  • Clinical trial safety information is incomplete

    • Few patients -- rare events likely to be missed

    • Not necessarily ‘real world’

  • Need info from post-marketing surveillance & spontaneous reports : Pharmacovigilance

  • Carried out by skilled clinicians & epidemiologists

  • Long history of research on issue, e.g.

    • Finney (1974, 1982) Royall (1971)

    • Inman (1970) Napke (1970)


Signal generation the traditional method l.jpg
Signal Generation: The Traditional Method Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

PatientExposure

ComparativeData

ConsultMarketing

ConsultDatabase

Consultation

Single

suspicious

case

or cluster

PotentialSignals

RefinedSignal(s)

Action

IntegrateInformation

IdentifyPotentialSignals

ConsultLiterature

ConsultProgrammer

StatisticalOutput

BackgroundIncidence


Some limitations of traditional approach l.jpg
Some Limitations of Traditional Approach Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

  • Incomplete reports of events, not reactions

  • How to compute effect magnitude

  • Many events reported, many drugs reported

  • Bias & noise in system

  • Difficult to estimate incidence because no. of pats at risk, pat-yrs of exposure seldom reliable

  • Inappropriate to consider incidence using only spontaneous reports


The pharmacovigilance process l.jpg
The Pharmacovigilance Process Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

Traditional

Methods

Data

Mining

Detect Signals

Generate Hypotheses

Insight from

Outliers

Public Health

Impact, Benefit/Risk

Refute/Verify

Type A

(Mechanism-based)

Estimate

Incidence

Act

Inform

Type B

(Idiosyncratic)

Restrict use/

withdraw

Change Label


Major uses of data mining l.jpg
Major Uses of Data Mining Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

  • Identify subtle associations that might exist in large databases

  • Early identification of potential toxicities

  • Identify complex relationships not apparent by simple summarization

  • Screening tool to identify potential associations to undergo clinical/epidemiological followup


More to pharmacovigilance than data mining l.jpg
More to Pharmacovigilance than Data Mining Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

  • Data mining a refinement to discover subtleties

  • Still need initial case review

    respond to reports involving severe, potential life-threatening events eg., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, agranulocytosis, anaphylactic shock

  • Clinical/biological/epidemiological verification of apparent associations is essential

  • Need to think about most effective use of data mining in routine pharmacovigilance practice


Statistical methodology 1 l.jpg
Statistical Methodology (1) Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

  • Not the key issue

  • Most use variations of 2-way table statistics

Basic idea:

Flag when R = a/E(a) is “large”

  • Some possibilities

  • Reporting Ratio: E(a) = nTD  nTA/n

  • Proportional Reporting Ratio: E(a) = nTD  c/nOD

  • Odds Ratio: E(a) = b  c/d


  • Statistical methodology 2 l.jpg
    Statistical Methodology (2) Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • Estimate variability in various ways, e.g., usual chi-square statistic, Bayesian & Empirical Bayesian models)

    • Similar results for all methods if more than a few drug/event combinations reported (e.g., 10)

    • No non-clinical “gold standard” → can’t assess diagnostic utility of any method in usual sense

    • OR > PRR > RR when a > E(a), doesn’t mean OR identifies real associations better than RR

    • RR probably most stable


    Spontaneous report database limitations l.jpg
    Spontaneous Report Database Limitations Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • Significant under reporting (esp. OTC) -- depending on seriousness or novelty of event, newness of drug, intensity of monitoriing

    • Different regulatory reporting requirements

    • Reflects only reporting practice, not incidence

    • Synonyms for drugs & events → sensitivity loss

    • Much duplication of reports

    • Exposure rate unknown

    • For any given report, there is no certainty that a suspected drug caused the reaction


    A major limitation often ignored l.jpg
    A Major Limitation (Often Ignored) Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • Accumulated reports cannot be used to calculate incidence or to estimate drug risk. Comparisons between drugs cannot be made from these data

    • Unfortunately, this still is done – disclaimers do not balance the effect of the misrepresentation

    • Easy to show differences with data mining techniques, but impossible to make valid inferences about causality and may mislead


    Implementation issues l.jpg
    Implementation Issues Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • Portfolio bias in company databases can lead to inaccurate estimates of relative reporting rates

    • Does public health benefit justify cost of following up signals detected by routine data mining methods?

    • Variation in tools and databases among regulators could lead to significant cost without public health benefit

    • Do frequency-based signal detection methods useful to regulators have business value in industry settings?

    • Need examples of situations where computerized approach failed to identify important issues and where signals were “created” by publicity or reporting artifacts


    Mining is easy refining low grade ore is hard l.jpg
    Mining is Easy, Refining Low-grade Ore is Hard Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • What is data mining activity intended to accomplish -- what are the clinical/epidemiological/regulatory questions that need to be answered

    • Need to address the impact of various factors, e.g., evolution of apparent association over time, association with key demographic factors such as age, sex, disease classification


    More issues l.jpg
    More Issues Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • Composition of database may be important, important associations of a new drug could be cloaked by events associated with an old drug with similar mechanism of action

    • Individual company databases tend to have comprehensive information about company products, but not general spectrum of drugs/ vaccines

    • Databases contain reports mentioning drugs, not demonstrations of causality


    Discussion l.jpg
    Discussion Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • Most apparent associations represent known problems

    • Some reflect disease or patient population

    • ~ 25% may represent signals about previously unknown associations

    • Statistical involvement in implementation & interpretation is important

    • The actual false positive rate is unknown as are the legal and resource implications


    What next l.jpg
    What Next? Techniques to Pharmacovigilance

    • PhRMA/FDA working group is considering ways to address issues – white paper will be published

    • May be worthwhile to construct & maintain a cleaned-up canonical database from AERS to provide a common resource for checking data mining findings based on individual company proprietary databases