1 / 18

Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band

Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band. Jagadheep D. Pandian Cornell University. Introduction. Most telescopes in U.S. currently do not have the capability to observe between 6 and 8 GHz of C-Band. This band includes the 6030 and 6035 MHz OH lines and the 6668 GHz line of methanol.

Download Presentation

Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fixing the frequency coverage hole in C-Band Jagadheep D. Pandian Cornell University GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  2. Introduction • Most telescopes in U.S. currently do not have the capability to observe between 6 and 8 GHz of C-Band. • This band includes the 6030 and 6035 MHz OH lines and the 6668 GHz line of methanol. • The latter is a very strong maser line observed in Galactic star forming regions. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  3. Methanol Masers at 6.7 GHz • The 51–60 A+ transition of methanol is the strongest of methanol masers. • The strongest source has a peak flux density of over 5000 Jy. • This line has not yet been detected in sources other than that associated with massive star formation. • For instance, Minier et al. (2003) carried out a survey towards 123 low-mass star forming regions in various stages of evolution, but did not make any detections of 6.7 GHz masers. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  4. Methanol masers at 6.7 GHz • This makes 6.7 GHz methanol masers unique compared to OH and H2O masers which are also found towards late type stars/low-mass stars. • What makes the 6.7 GHz line even more interesting is that it traces one of the earliest phases of massive star formation. • A sample of 6.7 GHz methanol masers can thus be used for studying the poorly understood early phases of massive star formation. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  5. Methanol masers at 6.7 GHz • Since these methanol masers are often not associated with infrared emission, they are best discovered using blind surveys. • To date, there have been only around four blind surveys carried out to detect 6.7 GHz methanol masers. • Most of the other surveys are targeted towards ultracompact HII (UCHII) regions and OH masers, although blind surveys show that the peak in the maser emission is often offset from the position of the UCHII region itself. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  6. Research done in U.S. • Currently, Arecibo is the only major facility in U.S. which has the capability to observe at 6.7 GHz. • However, Arecibo’s sky coverage is somewhat limited. • Most of the research on methanol masers has been done in Europe and Australia. • These continents have the capability to do both single dish work and synthesis imaging (ATCA, MERLIN, EVN). • The VLA is currently being fitted with new 4-8 GHz receivers as part of the EVLA project. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  7. The Arecibo methanol maser survey • The Arecibo methanol maser Galactic plane survey (AMGPS) is a blind survey for 6.7 GHz methanol masers in the Galactic Plane done between 35° < l < 54°, |b| < 0.4°. • The survey, which was completed in March 2006, produced a catalog that is complete at a flux density of 0.27 Jy (this was achieved using just 0.5 s integration per grid point). • The survey detected a total of 86 methanol masers, 48 of which are new detections. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  8. The Arecibo methanol maser survey • 37/86 sources have possible IRAS counterparts (within 23" of maser). • 9 out of 37 satisfy WC89 criteria for ultracompact HII regions, while 9 fail these criteria. • 46/86 sources have possible MSX counterparts. 4 are clearly associated with MSX dark clouds. • 9/86 sources have NVSS counterparts, and only one source has a counterpart in the catalog of Becker et al. (1991). • Clearly, most of the HII regions associated with methanol masers are too optically thick and compact to be detectable at 21 cm and at 5 cm. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  9. Regarding the total no. of methanol masers • J. van der Walt (2005) estimates the number of methanol masers in the Galaxy. • The methodology is to combine the initial mass function with the star formation law in the Galaxy (as a function of position) to create a distribution of massive stars as a function of galactic longitude. • Then, assuming that every massive star excites a methanol maser during its birth, one can determine the normalized distribution of methanol masers as a function of galactic longitude. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  10. Regarding the total no. of methanol masers • One can then use detection statistics of a blind survey to estimate the minimum number of methanol masers in the Galaxy. • Using an Australian blind survey, the minimum number of methanol maser is estimated to be 845. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  11. Regarding the total no. of methanol masers The solid line shows the observed distribution of methanol masers as a function of longitude, and the dashed line shows the expected distribution based on the star formation law. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  12. Regarding the total no. of methanol masers • One can then use detection statistics of a blind survey to estimate the minimum number of methanol masers in the Galaxy. • Using an Australian blind survey, the minimum number of methanol maser is estimated to be 845. • The statistics of the Arecibo survey increases this minimum number to 1075. • Note that a significant number of undetected masers are in regions not accessible to Arecibo, but accessible to the GBT. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  13. Potential impact of GBT @ 6.7 GHz • A blind survey done from GBT at l < 35° at a comparable or slightly worse sensitivity than Arecibo will detect a lot of methanol masers. • The unblocked aperture of GBT will be of immense help in detecting weak sources in the vicinity of very bright ones. • Catalogs from such surveys will be excellent follow-up targets for studies in millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths to better understand early stages of massive star formation. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  14. Histogram of flux densities all detections new detections GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  15. VLBI with methanol masers • GBT and Arecibo can be combined with the VLA to create an HSA type array to carry out high resolution synthesis imaging on methanol masers. • This will probe the kinematics of the massive star forming region. • The proper motions of maser spots can be determined through multi-epoch VLBI observations. • This is required to determine where the maser action occurs in relation to the central object. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  16. Example of VLBI science • Source G23.657-0.127 imaged using EVN by Bartkiewicz et al. (2005). GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  17. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

  18. Fixing the frequency hole in C-Band • Since NRAO has developed 4-8 GHz C-Band receivers for the EVLA project, the amount of time, effort and money required to fix the 6-8 GHz hole in GBT’s coverage is expected to be much less than otherwise. GBT Future Instrumentation Workshop

More Related