is kenneth waltz correct should iran get the bomb n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Is Kenneth Waltz Correct, Should Iran get the BOMB ? PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Is Kenneth Waltz Correct, Should Iran get the BOMB ?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Is Kenneth Waltz Correct, Should Iran get the BOMB ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Is Kenneth Waltz Correct, Should Iran get the BOMB ?. John A. Hughes. Neorealist LENS. Branch of Realism Focus on power politics proposed by classical theorists ( Hobbes, Machiavelli, Thucydides ) Rise of Realist thinkers, E. H Carr & Hans. J Morgenthau

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Is Kenneth Waltz Correct, Should Iran get the BOMB ?' - pooky

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
neorealist lens
Neorealist LENS
  • Branch of Realism
    • Focus on power politics proposed by classical theorists ( Hobbes, Machiavelli, Thucydides )
    • Rise of Realist thinkers, E. H Carr & Hans. J Morgenthau
      • E.H Carr’s The Twenty Year’s Crisis (1939): struggle for power, “haves & have-nots”
      • Hans J. Morgenthau’s Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (1948): Human nature, statecraft, national security.
  • Theory of International Politics(1979), Kenneth N. Waltz
    • Does not focus on human nature, statecraft or ethics in foreign policy that Morgenthau proposed
    • Focuses on structures
      • Domestic structures
      • “Relative Capabilities” (a states power)
neorealist balance of power theory
Neorealist Balance of Power THEORY
  • Peace and be achieved through Balance of Power
    • If states build equal military and economic abilities
    • Alliances
    • Occurred during the Cold War ( bipolar system)
    • Post Soviet Union ( multipolar system)
    • Advocates for nuclear proliferation
assessments critiques
Assessments & critiques
  • Waltz is Selective in his History
    • Bipolar systems do not guarantee peace
      • World War I (arms races and alliances)
      • Waltz argues World War I was caused by “chain-ganging” and codependent alliances
      • Not a satisfactory response
    • Cold War was not a peaceful time
      • Proxy wars
      • Waltz ignores this
iran s nuclear program current controversy
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Current Controversy
  • Does Iran have a nuclear weapon ?
    • Iran: No, its for peaceful purposes to make energy and be used for medical research.
    • United States & West, Yes: Fearful they are working towards making a nuclear weapon. Cites intelligence reports and lack of IAEA cooperation and to suspend uranium enrichment. Also peaceful programs can be dual-purpose
  • Why does Iran not Cooperate with the IAEA ?
    • Fell they do, just the IAEA ask for too much that is does not ask from other states, especially Israel
    • Other powers such as the US have known nuclear weapons and are not regulated or investigated by the IAEA
  • What’s Wrong with Iran Getting a Nuclear Weapon?
    • Gives them influence
    • Could be used against Israel
    • Could be used against the West.
early nuclear program 1957 1974
Early Nuclear Program (1957-1974)
  • President Eisenhower “Atoms for Peace Program
  • 1968 (signed 1970) Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) & 1974 signed Safeguards Agreement with International Atomic Energy Agency
  • 1970s, France & Germany also provided Iran assistance
  • 1974 India had a successful nuclear test, US national intelligence agency feared Iran developing a weapon
  • France pulled back on a deal two build two reactors in Darkhovin, and Germany withdrew from building a pair or reactors in Bushehr
  • 1979 Iranian Revolution West reversed support
  • 1979Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini canceled program, deemed it “anti-Islamic”
return to nuclear
Return to Nuclear
  • 1982 began to rebuild nuclear program
  • 1985 CIA reported that Iran was interested in building a nuclear weapon, predicted it would take at least a decade
  • 1989 Ayatollah Ali Khamenei comes to power.
  • 1995, CIA report predicted by 2000 Iran could produce a weapon with foreign assistance
  • Worked with Russia, N. Korea, China and Pakistan to help restart Bushehr and Darkhovin projects
start of controversy
Start of Controversy
  • August 2002 Alireza Jafarzadeh of the National Council of Resistance of Iran declared two nuclear sites under construction
    • Natanz (underground)
    • Arak (heavy water)
    • U.S intelligence agencies were aware of these facilities but reports remain classified
    • Israeli intelligence was also aware
    • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) not aware of this
    • Launched investigation fall 2002.
    • Did Iran violate the NPT?
      • No, when Iran signed countries were not required to notify IAEA until introducing nuclear material into facilities
      • IAEA changed agreement in 1992, requiring notification during the planning stage.
      • Iran did not sign the 1992 agreement until February 2003.
international concern
International concern
  • Fall 2003 EU-3 (France, Germany, United Kingdom)
    • Wanted to take diplomatic route to answer questions about Iran’s nuclear program: Produced Tehran Declaration and Paris Agreement
  • IAEA Reports 2003-2005
    • Reported Iran failed to fully report all nuclear acquisitions and activities
    • Found no evidence of nuclear program, but was unable to conclude if it was peaceful
  • Election of President Ahmadinejad 2005-2006
  • 2006 P5+1 China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom & United States
  • July & December 2006 UN Security Council demanded Iran suspend its uranium enrichment, later that year imposed sanctions
    • Cut off nuclear cooperation
    • Froze assets of those tied to Iran’s nuclear program
    • Resolutions from 2007-2009 expanded/ reaffirmed these sanctions.
    • Imposed harsher sanctions in 2010
iaea reports
IAEA Reports
  • 2007-2008
    • Iran was cooperative
    • Could not prove or disprove nuclear weapon
    • US National Intelligence could not find evidence of a nuclear program
  • 2009
    • Iran became less cooperative with IAEA requests
    • Increasingly started to enrich uranium
  • 2010
    • Iran enriching enough uranium to make two nuclear weapons
iaea reports1
  • November 2011 IAEA Report
    • Inspectors have credible evidence that Iran had been conducting experiments aimed at creating a nuclear bomb up until 2003
    • Identified “large explosive containment vessel”
    • IAEA passes resolution expressing “deep and increasing concern” over the military possibility of Iran’s nuclear program
    • Iran denies this
  • 2012
    • February, announced Iran’s refusal to allow access to the Parchin plant, which was rumored to have high-explosive research program
    • May, announced Iran was continuing to enrich uranium at a higher rate
    • August, highlighted Iran’s continued increased enrichment
why iran should get the bomb a neorealist point of view
Why IRAN SHOULD GET THE BOMB: a Neorealist Point of view
  • Kenneth Waltz, “Why Iran Should Get the Bomb:, Foreign Affairs, July/August 2010
  • Power Begs to be Balanced
    • Israel is the monopoly in nuclear power in the region
    • Israel bombed Iraq in 1981, and Syria in 2007 to prevent them from acquiring a nuclear weapon, could do the same to Iran
    • Since Israel acquired a nuclear weapon, the region has been in conflict
  • Unfounded Fears
    • Iran is rational
    • Countries are less hostile once they get nuclear capabilities (China, India and Pakistan)
balance of power does not apply
Balance of Power does not apply
  • The region would become less stable
    • Questionable if Iran would not attack Israel
        • Not all nuclear programs promise peace (N. Korea)
    • Would Iran give a weapon to a terrorist group?
      • Iran funds terrorist groups to spite the west and expand power
      • Could be used as a threat
    • Fails to evaluate Iranian-Syrian relations.
      • Syria would want the technology
      • Would Iran provide them the weapon ?
balance of power does not apply1
Balance of Power does not apply
  • Waltz finds Iran to be rational
    • This is correct, even Israeli intelligence agree to this
    • Rational also curtail to ensure survival
  • Bruno, Greg. Irans Nuclear Program. March 10, 2010. (accessed October 18, 2012).
  • Conybear, John A.C, and Todd Sandler. "The Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance: A Collective Goods Approach ." American Political Science Review 84, no. 4 (1990): 1197-1206.
  • Davenport, Kelsey. "History of Official Proposals on the Iranian Nuclear Issue." Arms Control Association . August 2012. (accessed October 30, 2012).
  • Department of National Intelligence . "Special National Intelligence Estimate: Prospects of Further Profliferation of Nuclear Weapons ." George Washington University . April 1974 , 1974. (accessed October 21, 20012).
  • Ferguson, Niall. The Pity of War Basic Books,. New York , NY : Basic Books , 2000.
  • IAEA . "Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran ." IAEA . November 26, 2003.
  • (accessed October 29, 2012).
  • —. "Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran ." IAEA . September 24, 2005. (accessed October 29 , 2012).
  • —. "Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran." IAEA . November 15, 2004. (accessed October 29, 2012).
  • —. "Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran." IAEA. February 4, 2006. (accessed October 29, 2012).
  • IAEA. "Implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran." International Atomic Energy Agency . June 19, 2003. (accessed October 23, 2012).
  • (accessed October 18, 2012).
  • —. "TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS." International Atomic Energy Agency. April 22, 1970. (accessed October 18, 2012).
  • Jackson, Robert, and George Sorensen. Introduction to Internaitonal Relations: Theories & Approaches. Vol. 4th. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • Kerr, Paul K. "Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status." Congressional Research Service . October 17, 2012. (accessed October 29, 2012).
  • Lambert, Nicholas A. "British Naval Policy, 1913-1914: Financial Limitation and Strategic Revolution"." The Journal of Modern History 67, no. 3 (1995).
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Vol. 5. New York, NY : Alferd E. Knopf , 1978 [1948].
  • United Nations Security Council . "SECURITY COUNCIL DEMANDS IRAN SUSPEND URANIUM ENRICHMENT BY 31 AUGUST, OR FACE POSSIBLE ECONOMIC, DIPLOMATIC SANCTIONS ." United Nations . July 31, 2006. (accessed October 31 , 2012).
  • —. "SECURITY COUNCIL REAFFIRMS EARLIER RESOLUTIONS ON IRAN’S URANIUM ENRICHMENT, CALLS ON COUNTRY TO COMPLY WITH OBLIGATIONS ‘FULLY AND WITHOUT DELAY’ Resolution 1835 (2008) Adopted Unanimously." United Nations . September 27, 2008. (accessed October 31 , 2012).
  • —. "SECURITY COUNCIL TOUGHENS SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN, ADDS ARMS EMBARGO, WITH UNANIMOUS ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 1747 (2007) Further Steps Promised if No Compliance Reported by IAEA in 60 days; Iran’s Foreign Minister Says Pressure, Intimidation Will Not Change Poli." United Nations . March 24, 2007. (accessed October 30, 2012).
  • United Nations Security Council. "SECURITY COUNCIL IMPOSES ADDITIONAL SANCTIONS ON IRAN, VOTING 12 IN FAVOUR TO 2 AGAINST, WITH 1ABSTENTION." United Nations. June 9, 2010. (accessed October 30, 2012).
  • Waltz, Kenneth. "Globalization and Governance ." PS Political Science and Politics 32, no. 4 (1999): 693-700.
  • —. "The Emergining Structure of Internaitonal Politics." International Security , Autumn 1993: 44-79.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. "Realism After the Cold War." International Security 25, no. 1 (2000): 5-41.
  • —. Theory of International Politics. 1st Ediiton . New York, NY : McGraw HIll , 1979.
  • —. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. July/August 2012.