1 / 31

ASNE – Tidewater Chapter Brief US Coast Guard Maintenance Support Transformation

ASNE – Tidewater Chapter Brief US Coast Guard Maintenance Support Transformation. RADM Ron Rábago, USCG Chief Engineer, Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Logistics (CG-4) March 19, 2014. Naval Engineering Challenges.

phiala
Download Presentation

ASNE – Tidewater Chapter Brief US Coast Guard Maintenance Support Transformation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASNE – Tidewater Chapter BriefUS Coast Guard Maintenance Support Transformation RADM Ron Rábago, USCG Chief Engineer, Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Logistics (CG-4) March 19, 2014

  2. Naval Engineering Challenges • Expanding mission requirements & increased op tempo (more days at sea) • Maintaining mission readiness with declining resource environment • Bring newer assets into service & integrate their more complex maintenance needs into fleet-wide processes • Significantly aging fleet

  3. Service Life (Area Cutters)

  4. CG Maintenance Support Transformation • Represents an overarching strategy to build on our Service's strengths • 6-part formula is used to measure progress of logistics transformation - Reorganizing into Product Lines - Building the asset’s Integrated Baseline - Enrolling in the Electronic Asset Log (EAL) - Generating the asset class Allowance List - Centralizing Maintenance Funds - Pushing Parts to the Fleet

  5. Product Lines Organized Into CG Business Model Product Line Management - Keystone of 4 Cornerstones SFLC Product Lines are organized around the Business Model

  6. Product Line FleetSupport Model Product Lines interface with the Fleet Shared Service Div’s support Product Lines SFLC PRODUCT LINES - Single Fleet Touchpoint; - Manage all Maintenance Funds SHARED SERVICE DIVs - Subject Matter Experts - Set Std Processes for PLs FLEET SUPPORT REQUEST • Engineering Branch • Std Cutter/Boat Config + Changes • Maint. Procedures & Casualty Repairs • Maintenance Cost per Operating Hr • Engineering Services; • Business Ops; • Procurement • Supply Branch • Inventory Management • Requisitions & Replenishment • Asset Logistics; • Business Ops; • Procurement • Program Depot Maint. Br • Availability Planning • Availability Execution • Industrial Ops; • Engineering Services; • Procurement

  7. Pace of Integration

  8. Knowledge Management (Officer / Enlisted / Civilian) • NAVAL ENGINEERING OFFICERS: • - Depot maintenance planning, supply support, • engineering services, business operations, • metrics, & contract management • ENLISTED: • - Organic tech reps, maintenance augmentation • teams, engineer petty officers, & Command • Master/Senior Chiefs • CIVILIANS: • - SMEs Naval Arch & Marine Engineering, future • tech warrant holders, & geographically distributed • workforce

  9. Centers of Excellence • U.S. Coast Guard Yard • - Organic Ship Repair and Overhaul Facility • National Industrial Enterprise • - Predominantly Civilian Workforce Providing Depot-Level Support to Meet Operational Requirements & Contingencies for Surface and Shore Assets, & Aids to Navigation • Project Resident Offices • - Technical Authority • - Ship Design Team 9

  10. Product Line Focus - Maintenance Cost Per Op Hr*(* Note: MCPOH ≠ Total CPOH) Maintenance Cost Per Op Hour Primary Purpose: Determine when the rising cost on maintenance justifies SLEP or recapitalization of an asset (AKA: “bathtub curve”). As assets get older they cost more to maintain. Years in Service

  11. Actual MCPOH

  12. Results of Maintenance Support Transformation • Better mission support enterprise - Product Line Management • CFO Audit unqualified opinion in 2013 - “Clean bill of Health” • Improved contracting - 170+ Multi Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) & Multi Year / Multi Ship (MYMS) / Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quality (IDIQ) contracts in FY10-13 • Meaningful metrics - SFLC Annual Report

  13. Way Forward On Transformation • Increased centralization of funds • Improved metrics to enable better decision making • Strengthen & mature Product Line Management across the fleet & other Mission Support elements • More efficient enterprise management • Smooth Transition Acquisition to Sustainment

  14. Fleet Sustainment & Modernization • Non-linear Finite Element Analysis • define loading capacity of deformed, corroded hull structure • Operator Guidance System • display real-time quantitative data on hull deflection/stress for risk analysis • 3D Laser Scan • survey local & global hull deformations • In Service Vessel Sustainment • WMEC, WLB, WTGB, MLB • New Acquisitions • NSC, FRC, OPC, RBM

  15. In Service Vessel Sustainment Mission Effectiveness Program (MEP) • 270’ WMEC Midlife Maintenance Availability (MMA) • 225’ WLB • 87’ WPB • Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) • EAGLE (67 years) • 140’ WTGB (34 years) • 47’ MLB (17 years)

  16. New Acquisitions FRC 3 FRC 1 FRC 4 CGC Bertholf CGC Waesche FRC 5 FRC 6 CGC Stratton • 418’ NSCs – 3 delivered • 154’ FRCs – 7 delivered • OPC Phase 1 Award Feb 2014 • RBM 147 out of 170 delivered NSC 6 NSC 5 OPC FRC 2 NSC 4 FRC 7 Continuous Recapitalization Commissioning Timeline 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

  17. Polar Star Reactivation Project USCGC POLAR STAR (WAGB-10) conducting ice-trials in the Arctic post-reactivation (August 2013)

  18. Reactivation Project Overview • POLAR STAR was at the end of her • service life (Commissioned in 1976) and • in caretaker status since 2006. • $90 million, 3-year industrial project • executed through a Multi-Ship Multi-Option • (MSMO) contract with Vigor (formerly Todd • Pacific) Shipyards in Seattle, WA. • Major upgrades to propulsion, auxiliary • and mission systems; and completion of • more than 5-years of backlogged • maintenance. POLAR STAR entering Vigor Shipyard dry-dock (January 2011)

  19. Polar Star’s Hull USCGC POLAR STAR entering drydock after 3 years with no maintenance; 4% of coating replaced.

  20. Main Diesel Engine Upgrades & Repairs. Main Gas Turbine Digital Fuel Control System Upgrade. Main Motor Cleaning. Main Gas Turbine Renewal. Reduction Gear Inspection & Repairs. Machinery Control and Monitoring System (MCAMS) Upgrade. Open Loop Controllable Pitch Propeller (CPP) System Conversion. Aft Stern Tube Bearing Redesign & Renewal. Gyro Compass Upgrade. Central Hydraulics System (CHS) & Cargo Cranes Renewal. Small Boat Davit Renewal. Major System Upgrades

  21. Polar Star Before Icebreaking Picture

  22. Polar Star After Icebreaking Picture

  23. Sentinel Class

  24. Original Prop Swirland Rudder

  25. Redesigned Skegs & Rudders

  26. Redesigned SkegFrom Starboard Side

  27. Stern Flaps & Spray Rails

  28. Stern Flaps & Spray Rails

  29. Modified Propeller Swirl & Wake Adapted Rudder

  30. Modifications • Rudder Re-Design - Wake adapted approach • Stern Flaps & Spray Rails - 11.8% fuel savings (OP) • Wake Adapted Skegs - 1.5% to 2.0% increase in hull efficiency • Propeller Re-Design - Modify pitch & camber to avoid ERPM limitations • Annual Savings - $96K per Cutter per year • Flank speed increase - From 28.9 to 32.9 knots

  31. Questions?

More Related