2004 iac director s meeting n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
2004 IAC Director’s Meeting PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
2004 IAC Director’s Meeting

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

2004 IAC Director’s Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on

2004 IAC Director’s Meeting. Drew McMahan Oregon State University IAC. Implementation Analysis From Ellie Najafi, Bradley University. Understanding Implementation Rates What ARs have the highest/lowest implementation rates? What are the correlations between ARs and rejection codes?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '2004 IAC Director’s Meeting' - petra


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
2004 iac director s meeting

2004 IAC Director’s Meeting

Drew McMahan

Oregon State University IAC

implementation analysis from ellie najafi bradley university
Implementation AnalysisFrom Ellie Najafi, Bradley University
  • Understanding Implementation Rates
    • What ARs have the highest/lowest implementation rates?
    • What are the correlations between ARs and rejection codes?
  • Using Knowledge to Improve Report Performance
    • Include client in brainstorming session
    • Provide additional training to IAC staff
    • Include decision makers in final exit interview
    • Modify rejection codes
    • Modify format of final report
    • Provide client recognition for high implementation rates
the osu iac response
The OSU IAC Response
  • Active Follow-Up
    • Facilitate report distribution, understanding
    • Track and respond clients’ impressions of the report.
best practices tools
Best Practices Tools
  • http://www.oit.doe.gov/bestpractices/software_tools.shtml
  • Current Tools
    • Airmaster+
    • MotorMaster+
    • 3E+
    • PSAT, FSAT
    • SSAT, NxEAT
  • Future Tools
    • CHP Tool
    • Combined Tool Suite
  • IAC Utilization of BP Tools
  • Internal IAC Tool Exchange(?)
slide5
CHP
  • CHP Tools
    • CogenPro; http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~eadc/cogenH.html
    • DOE CHP Tool, Resources;
      • http://www.eere.energy.gov/de/information/info_tools.shtml
    • Other Tools
  • RACs – Regional Application Centers
    • RAC-IAC Synergy
      • UIC Case, Future Goals
    • AR Payback Penalty
database metrics from rutgers
Database MetricsFrom Rutgers
  • Direct Metrics
    • Average Implemented Energy $ Saved
    • Average Implemented Energy $ Saved / Usage
    • Average Implemented Energy / Usage in Btus
    • Average Implemented $ Saved
    • Average Implemented Energy MMBtu’s Saved
  • Indirect Metrics
    • Total Number of Different ARs
    • Recommended $ Saved per Assessment Day
    • Total number of Energy ARs
    • Total number of non-energy ARs
slide7
Programmatic Issues (PI)
    • Industrial Coverage
    • Geographic Coverage
    • Number of IAC Students Employed
    • Average Number of IAC Students Attending Assessments
    • Teaching Faculty Participation
    • Timeliness
  • Performance Adjustment Factors (PAFs)
peer review from director s roundtable
Peer ReviewFrom Director’s Roundtable
  • Facilitate report improvement
    • Independent of DOE metrics
  • PDF Exchange?