1 / 11

Event-Driven Architecture for Synchronizing Active Directory Groups

Event-Driven Architecture for Synchronizing Active Directory Groups. Nathan Dors – University of Washington dors@uw.edu Eric Kool-Brown – University of Washington k ool@uw.edu. Active Directory in Higher Ed IT. Granting access to Windows resources via Access Control List entries

pete
Download Presentation

Event-Driven Architecture for Synchronizing Active Directory Groups

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Event-Driven Architecture for Synchronizing Active Directory Groups Nathan Dors – University of Washington dors@uw.edu Eric Kool-Brown – University of Washington kool@uw.edu

  2. Active Directory in Higher Ed IT • Granting access to Windows resources via Access Control List entries • Best practice to use groups as ACE trustees rather than individual user accounts • Groups being used as Exchange Distribution Lists • Interop with Linux/Unix systems via LDAP, Kerberos, and SAMBA • Customers continue to figure out new ways to use our AD services EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  3. Connecting Access Management Systems • The Vision • Seamless information flow through IT systems • Architectural agility for updating IT systems • Traditional Solutions • Domain-specific, hardwired, batch oriented • Scheduled rather than real-time • IDM Suites (OpenIDM, OIM, AD/FIM) • Relatively heavyweight alternatives • Enterprise Integration Patterns • Guidance on how to roll your own heavyweight system • Event Driven Architecture – a lightweight approach EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  4. Event Driven Architecture • EDA facilitates the transfer of information between producing and consuming systems • It is a design pattern that decouples components • An intermediate component: a message queue • An intermediate format: a message schema • Flexibility as to the propagation model • It provides near real-time information propagation • Components and systems can evolve independently • The message schema is versioned • EDA can facilitate a GR/DR capability if the queue is in the cloud EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  5. Propagating Access Management Changes • The UW uses Grouper as the groups data master • There are multiple downstream consumers of Grouper changes • AD changes used to be pulled via scheduled batch processes • We switched to EDA via Apache ActiveMQ a year ago • Requires in-house hardware and support • We are moving to Amazon SNS and SQS • AWS is an attractive option due to simplicity, flexibility, and reasonable cost • Trivial to add new consumer queues to an SNS topic EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  6. Information Security Considerations • Group data risk assessment and classification • Assessment conducted by Michael Brogan 2 years ago • http://events.internet2.edu/2011/spring-mm/agenda.cfm?go=session&id=10001722&event=1035 • UW policy data classes: public, restricted, or confidential • Groups have a hierarchical administrative model • Admin controls on who can create groups and modify their attributes and membership • Group data is signed and encrypted while in transit • In addition to the SSL data channel encryption • Groups with viewer restrictions cannot be Exchange email-enabled EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  7. UW AD as a Group Event Consumer • Group Sync Agent is a Windows Service and reads from the ActiveMQ or SQS queue • Periodic reconciliation compares Grouper data to AD data and adjusts the latter as needed • Group viewership restrictions result in the updating of AD group ACLs • Brian’s Hiding Data in ADhttp://blogs.uw.edu/uwwi-blog/ • Administrative model is enforced in Grouper, AD groups updated only by Group Sync (with a few exceptions) • AD replication latency issues resolved by using domain controller affinity • Event queues are abstracted as interfaces EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  8. What's Next? • Completing the switch over to Amazon SNS/SQS • Implementations for other queues, e.g. Azure Message Bus? • Using the message queue model for bi-directional group change flow (for those exceptional groups) • Perhaps inserting a workflow processor in place of a simple queue • Sharing code? EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  9. Conclusion • Happy with results, it’s very reliable and usually quite fast • ~50k messages per month • Course group creation at quarter start imposes an unusual load; ACL setting causes queue back ups • Prioritizing interactive group changes over bulk updates • Release course creation over a longer period of time • Looking at other places were the EDA pattern can be applied EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  10. Appendix EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

  11. EDA & Syncing AD Groups 2013.11.07

More Related