130 likes | 259 Views
Financial protection in the South East Asia region: determinants and policy implications Hui Wang and Lluis Vinyals, WHO SEARO, 11 December 2017. http://www.who.int/health_financing/events/en/ http://www.searo.who.int/about/administration_structure/hsd/measuring-financial-protection/en/.
E N D
Financial protection in the South East Asia region: determinants and policy implications Hui Wang and Lluis Vinyals, WHO SEARO, 11 December 2017
http://www.who.int/health_financing/events/en/ http://www.searo.who.int/about/administration_structure/hsd/measuring-financial-protection/en/
This presentation will discuss The financial protection situation in SEAR at a glance The determinants of out-of-pocket spending What is being done to tackle the main issue: Medicines Elements to consider when dealing with the financial protection challenge
Context (averages): high OOP, low public spending • SEAR has the highest OOP share of total health expenditure amongst WHO regions • Government spending is amongst the lowest Out of pocket and General Government Health Expenditure, as share to Total Health Expenditure, 2014
Financial protection is measured in two ways: • Catastrophic health expenditure • Proportion of the population with large household expenditures on health as a share of total household expenditure or income • Impoverishment due to health • Proportion of population that falls below the poverty line (increased incidence) due to health related spending • What is missing? • Further impoverishment: People (poor citizens) already poor cannot be “impoverished” • Foregone care: People (poor citizens) not using services are not captured in the picture because they spend “nothing”
Financial protection: Catastrophic health expenditures Incidence of catastrophic health expenditure in six SEAR countries
Impoverishment due to health: approximately 57 million people are being impoverished in the 6 countries
Impoverishment: equity perspective Percentage of population being pushed under international poverty line due to OOP (2011 PPP international dollar*), by expenditure/consumption quintile • 0 values amongst the poorest reflect that further impoverishment is not captured here • In countries relying on OOP, even the richest can fall into poverty • Rural population suffer more except in Timor-Leste Percentage of population being pushed under the international poverty line due to OOP (2011 PPP international dollar), by rural/urban
Components of OOP expenditure: Medicines driving financial hardship Share of medicines in out-of-pocket health expenditure in six SEAR countries • In four countries, medicines spending drives OOP • Sri Lanka OOP is led by payments to outpatient private facilities. Thailand led by inpatient care (ATTENTION: this is in relative terms)
Existing policies to increase access to medicines seems not working: why? • Supply-side policies: free access to a list of essential medicines, usually supplied by public distribution channels (in most countries) • Achilles heel: effective use of public facilities and reliability of the procurement and distribution system • Demand-side policies: reimbursing patients or facilities for medicines dispensed to users (in few countries) • Pre-conditions of success: contracting and reimbursing scheme in place. Inclusion of medicines • Market based solutions: regulating prices and markups, to make them affordable • Main issue is related to many people (poor) cannot afford them at any price • Important additional points: • Low levels of public spending in many countries • Health financing solutions may not be enough to manage over-consumption of medicines
Fighting financial protection will require more strategic purchasing: What does this mean? • Defining what to deliver/ purchase: to cover medicines? All? How? • Defining how to pay for services: extra money will not translate into financial protection if paying providers is not “managed” • Defining who should provide the services: are users using more private providers? Coverage might depend on engaging with them Thailand includes medicines in the UC scheme, using tax based money, channeled through capitation to districts
Few final messages • Globally, the median incidence of CHE (25% threshold) is 1% • India and Nepal have higher incidence • Financial protection issues in the region mainly linked to medicines (India, Nepal, Bhutan and Timor Leste) • Policies in place fall short of intended goals • Low spending, narrow scope and passive purchasing • Epidemiological transition will require bolder actions, including tackling the medicines
Thank you for your attention Hui WANG and Lluis VINYALS TORRES Health Economics and Planning Unit Department of Health Systems and Development WHO/SEARO HWANG@who.int and LVINALSTORRES@who.int