1 / 50

(Building) Code Assessment

(Building) Code Assessment Drawing on the Experience of Others Barry D. Yatt, FAIA, CSI Arch 402/503 School of Architecture and Planning The Catholic University of America Why? In poorly designed buildings, people can get hurt .

Download Presentation

(Building) Code Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. (Building) Code Assessment Drawing on the Experience of Others Barry D. Yatt, FAIA, CSI Arch 402/503 School of Architecture and Planning The Catholic University of America

  2. Why? • In poorly designed buildings, people can get hurt. • People want assurance that the buildings they live in meet a minimum standard of quality. • Architects sometimes need a little help designing safe buildings. (Nobody is born with the knowledge and schools don’t provide enough exposure.)

  3. Approach • Codes let designers decide what functionality and overall form they want. • Designers let codes set minimum performance levels to increase the chances that the design will be safe.

  4. How? It's all about if/then relationships. • If you decide x… …then the code will require y. • If you don’t like y… …then you can change decision x.

  5. What? • Configuration (bldg size, compartmentation) • Fire-resistance (how long it lasts) • Egress (occupant count, path to safety) • Habitability (size, comfort, hygiene) • Accessibility (movement through bldg) • Structural Capacity (load handling) • Quality of Materials and Workmanship

  6. What? Let’s look at these issues, one at a time

  7. Configuration

  8. Configuration: You Decide… • Use: “Use Groups” (IBC Chapter 3). Yes, you decide—the code just tells you what to call it. • Size: Area, height, number of stories

  9. Configuration: You Decide… And to a lesser degree… • Budget: To the degree that it permits use of more fire-resistant assemblies • Degree of Enclosure: Openness

  10. Configuration: Code Sets… • Construction Classification (IBC Table 503), which establishes your options.

  11. Configuration: Options • AFS: Automatic Fire Suppression. Doubles area, adds height. • Street Frontage: For Fire Dept access. Default is 25% • Compartmentation: Smaller compartments justify lower-rated assemblies

  12. Fire-resistance

  13. Fire-resistance: You Decide… • Construction Classification as just noted, as a function of intended configuration, using IBC Table 503

  14. Fire-resistance: Code Sets… • Minimum Fire-Resistance Ratings, measured in hours

  15. Fire-resistance: Code Sets… • And indirectly: Construction Assembly Options

  16. Fire-resistance: Options… • Wrap required assemblies in preferable coverings. For example, enclose Type V (heavy timber) in drywall. • Provide minimum clearances. For example, keep ceilings 20’ above floors) • Change Construction Classification, backing up a step to rethink your earlier decision

  17. Egress

  18. Egress: You decide… • Use, Arrangement and Sizes of Rooms. So, until there’s a design, one can’t proceed. • Occupancy count, as a function of room use and size.

  19. Egress: You decide… • Egress strategy. What method do you want to use to get occupants out? • 1 Direct Exits • 2 Horizontal Exits • 3 Vertical Exits • 4 Escapes

  20. Egress: Code Sets… Basics • Minimum number of exits • Minimum provided Areas of Refuge

  21. Egress: Code Sets… Distances • Minimum distance between exits

  22. Egress: Code Sets… Distances • Maximum distance to closest exit

  23. Egress: Code Sets… Distances • Maximum distance to an exit choice (“common path”)

  24. Egress: Code Sets… Distances • Maximum distance travelled past exit (“dead end”)

  25. Egress: Code Sets… Capacities • Minimum width of exit path

  26. Egress: Code Sets… Capacities • Maximum encroachment on path • Door swings • Knobs • Handrails • Drinking Fountains

  27. Egress: Code Sets… • When within the stair • When transferring between stairs • When discharging from the exit Enclosure of vertical exits

  28. Egress: Options • Design the exit path cleverly: use horizontal exits, exit passages, etc. • Use AFS (sprinklers) • Try using “timed exiting” (if the design is amenable to it and if you have access to sophisticated fire-modeling software).

  29. Habitability

  30. Habitability: You decide… • Which program spaces fall into which habitability category. Is it… • Habitable • Occupiable • Subsidiary • Uninhabitable

  31. Habitability: Code Sets…

  32. Habitability: Options • Not much. These standards really are minimums. Be honest in applying them. • Don’t design a space with less than 5’ of headroom, then let it be counted as useable SF in the sales brochures. • Don’t design a bedroom in a space that has less than 4% of operable window. • This does have implications for affordable housing. It’s intended to.

  33. Accessibility

  34. Accessibility: You decide… • How program spaces are to be arranged, both vertically and horizontally • Where operable devices (doors, vending machines, paper towel dispensers, etc.) are to be located

  35. Accessibility : Code Sets… • Maximum difficulty of getting to program spaces (can deny access but not participation) • Minimum widths for doors (32”/36”) and halls (42”/60”) • Maximum slopes (1:12) and distances between landings (30” rise) at ramps • Vertical placement of operable devices (buttons, pulls, etc.) for reach

  36. Accessibility : Code Sets… • Maximum difficulty of use • Grasping railings (1½” diameter, 1½” from wall) • Turning knobs and levers, grip-ability • Pushing doors open or closed • Minimum levels of dignity • No acceptable marginalization • Views past others

  37. Accessibility : Options • Still very much a designer’s call. ADAAG and ANSI 117.1 provide some guidance. • Errors caught mostly by frustrated users rather than permit review process. • Enforced by lawsuit demanding compliance with ADA.

  38. Structural Capacity

  39. Structural Capacity: You decide… • Program, which determines anticipated usage loads (libraries, warehouses, factories, etc). • Location, with its associated wind, rain, and seismic loads • Massing, which determines where… • snow buildup might occur • seismic loads might concentrate.

  40. Structural Capacity : Code Sets… • Minimum structural capacities (resistance to live load) based on intended use and (if relevant) massing • IBC Chapter 16

  41. Structural Capacity : Options Options are often less needed since: • Codes mostly set minimum loads, not the way they are handled. • Requirements can usually be met without adversely affecting architecture. • The risk of failure is sufficient to discourage code avoidance.

  42. Quality

  43. Quality: You decide… • The materials from which to build, based both on design considerations and such code mandates as fire-resistance.

  44. Quality : Code Sets… • Minimum standards for the manufacture and installation of those materials. • They usually do this by mandating standards written by other groups: • Publishers such as ANSI, ASTM • Trade associations that represent manufacturers such as BIA, AWI • Trade unions that represent installers

  45. Quality : Options • Code mandates are minimums. It’s unlikely that avoiding them would carry substantive advantages. • Standards may not be available for some recently-developed materials. Without them, the materials may not be allowed. This can be frustrating, but there is usually no alternative.

  46. In Conclusion

  47. The Bottom Line • Code officials want to protect the public. They understand that codes are only one way to increase predictability. • If you can demonstrate the safety of a non-compliant design (through testing, modeling, etc.), it’s quite possible that it will be approved.

  48. Communicating Compliance • Indicateapplied codes (full name [IBC, IPC, NFPA 101, ANSI 117.1], year). • Show occupancy count: Floor plans that show populations in each room, plus location, configuration and width of egress paths • Summarize: Issue - Required - Provided

  49. Getting Started • Use the Table of Contents to focus your research

  50. Now It’s Your Turn Questions and Discussion

More Related