experimental design analysis l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Experimental Design & Analysis PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Experimental Design & Analysis

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Experimental Design & Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 190 Views
  • Uploaded on

Experimental Design & Analysis. Introduction & Causal Inference January 23, 2006. Course Introduction. The goal of this course is to provide doctoral students the concepts and tools needed to investigate research questions using experimental methods This course focuses on:

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Experimental Design & Analysis' - patia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
experimental design analysis

Experimental Design & Analysis

Introduction & Causal Inference

January 23, 2006

DOCTORAL SEMINAR, SPRING SEMESTER 2006

course introduction
Course Introduction
  • The goal of this course is to provide doctoral students the concepts and tools needed to investigate research questions using experimental methods
  • This course focuses on:
    • Causal inference and validity
    • Experimental design
    • Data analysis and use of SAS, SPSS
course texts
Course Texts
  • We will be using three texts:
    • Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Keppel, G. and Wickens, T.D. (2004). Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    • Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
discussion readings
Discussion Readings
  • Readings from journal articles will be the basis of class discussion
    • Submit written one-page summary
    • Prepare discussion questions
other resources
Other Resources
  • Cody, R. and Smith, J. (1997). Applied Statistics and the SAS Programming Language, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • SAS, SPSS software should be installed on your PC
evaluative criteria
Evaluative Criteria
  • Class participation and attendance 20%
  • Weekly homework assignments 25%
  • Midterm exam (March 20, 2006) 25%
  • Final project* 30%
    • Design of experiment, hypotheses
    • Data collection
    • Analysis
    • Presentation of hypotheses, findings

*HRC approval necessary

what is science
What is Science?
  • Epistemological traditions
    • Mysticism
    • Rationality
    • Logical Positivists
    • Post-Positivists
  • Scientific method
mysticism
Mysticism
  • Operates without intellectual effort or sensory processing
    • Arrive at knowledge or belief through non-rational means, such as through faith or feeling
rationalism
Rationalism
  • Knowledge is developed through reasoning
    • Syllogisms
    • Proofs
      • Logical rules are followed to arrive at an acceptable conclusion
modus ponens
Modus Ponens

All crows are black (the major premise)

This is a crow (the minor premise)

Therefore, this crow is black (the conclusion)

modus tollens
Modus Tollens

If it rains, the game will be canceled (the major premise)

The game was not canceled (the minor premise)

Therefore, it did not rain (the conclusion)

empiricism
Empiricism
  • Knowledge through observation, experience through our senses
    • Naïve empiricism:anything that cannot be directly observed does not exist
    • Sophisticated empiricism: we can observe phenomena indirectly through direct observation of the impact on other things
goals of scientific research
Goals of Scientific Research
  • To describe behavior
  • To predict behavior
  • To determine the causes of behavior
  • To understand or explain behavior
description and prediction
Description and Prediction
  • Description begins with careful observation
  • Prediction based on observation of regularity of phenomena
    • Two events are systematically related to one another, it becomes possible to make prediction
    • Illusory correlations?
determining causation
Determining Causation
  • Accurate prediction does not imply accurate causal attribution
    • Predict rain when it is cloudy
    • Predict light turns on when switch is flipped
determining causation16
Determining Causation
  • Cause and effect are distinct entities
    • When these are the same, relationship is tautological
  • Cause and effect covary
    • Probabilistic relationship
  • Cause precedes effect
  • Elimination of rival explanations
power of explanation
Power of Explanation
  • Researchers seek to discover what is the nature of the relationship that causes an effect or phenomenon and allows prediction
exploring relationships
Exploring Relationships
  • Breast-fed babies have higher IQs than formula-fed babies
  • Plastic surgery patients are more likely to commit suicide
  • Violence on TV increases rate of crime among youth
  • School breakfast programs lead to improved academic performance
distinctions of importance
Distinctions of Importance
  • Correlation vs. causation vs. confounds
  • Independent vs. dependent variable
  • Construct vs. variable
  • Treatment group vs. control group
  • Causal description vs. causal explanation
  • Randomized vs. quasi experiments
  • Natural experiment vs. observation
  • Falsification vs. confirmation
experiments
Strengths

Establish a causal relationship

Advantage over correlational data

Control variation

Weaknesses

Artificiality of setting

Theory-laden assumptions

Limited generalizability

Experiments