1 / 24

What would full employment look like in contemporary Britain? Amna Silim 27 th November 2013

What would full employment look like in contemporary Britain? Amna Silim 27 th November 2013. Outline. The new case for full employment The evolution of British employment policy Full employment in the mid 2000s The potential trade-offs with full employment

parley
Download Presentation

What would full employment look like in contemporary Britain? Amna Silim 27 th November 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What would full employment look like in contemporary Britain? Amna Silim 27th November 2013

  2. Outline • The new case for full employment • The evolution of British employment policy • Full employment in the mid 2000s • The potential trade-offs with full employment • Elements of a new definition of full employment • Policy directions

  3. The new case for full employment • 80 per cent employment rate – alongside very low unemployment rate • Additional 3.5 million people would need to be in work

  4. The evolution of British employment policy • 1945 to mid-1960s: post-war consensus on full employment / demand management • Late 1960s and 1970s: breakdown of the post-war consensus – rising inflation, oil shocks • 1970s / 1980s: new orthodoxy – low and stable inflation • 1990s / 2000s: inflation focus + employability • Late 2000s: more focus on wider labour supply but rooted in employability

  5. The long-term picture

  6. The new case for full employment

  7. Why full employment? • Labour market inclusion • Family incomes and poverty • Public finances

  8. Benefits of full employment • If higher employment forced up real wages by 2 per cent in 2013/14 (instead of the 1.5 per cent drop predicted by OBR) • In 2013/14 tax credit and benefit spending would be £1.1 billion lower • Income tax and national insurance receipts would increase by £12.5 billion higher

  9. Benefits of full employment Increasing the employment rate from 71.5 per cent to 73 per cent • Net gain to the exchequer of £5.5 billion • Spending on tax credits would fall by £2.4 billion a year • Income tax and national insurance receipts would rise by £3.1 billion

  10. International context (1)

  11. International context (2)

  12. ‘Full employment’ in the mid-2000s

  13. ‘Full employment’ in 1973 and 2006

  14. ‘Full employment’ in 2006 • Strong employment performance among prime-age men • Employment gaps fell - but significant gaps remained: • People with particular disabilities • Some people from an ethnic minority background • Older women • People with few / none formal qualifications • Parts of the North, Wales, Northern Ireland, London • 4 million+ working-age adults remained on out-of-work benefits

  15. Regional employment trends

  16. Northern Ireland employment • Northern Ireland 2006 • Female Employment: 61.3 per cent (UK 66.9 per cent) • Male employment rate: 74.3 per cent (79.0 per cent) • Inactivity rate: 27.2 per cent (23.0 per cent) 2013 • Older employment rate: 61.7 per cent (NI average 67.3 per cent) • Youth employment rate: 40.9 per cent (NI average 67.3 per cent)

  17. The potential trade-offs of full employment

  18. Inflation • Relationship between inflation and unemployment very weak over the last 20 years • External factors (e.g. commodity prices) have been more important for determining inflation

  19. Productivity • Good evidence for an employment-productivity trade-off • Higher employment rates means more people with relatively low productivity in work, often in low-productivity sectors • But weak productivity growth in domestic sector likely to mean weak wage growth, poor job quality

  20. Elements of a new definition of full employment

  21. Key components • Target employment as well as unemployment • Households as well as individuals • Tackle household worklessness • Dual-earner household strategy • Recognise people’s roles as parents, carers and active citizens • Opportunities for learning esp. for young people

  22. Do we need a target? • Technical difficulties over definition • Post-war governments got there without a target • Politicians unlikely to adopt until close to achieving • But need an answer to ‘what do you mean by full employment?’ • Full employment = low unemployment rate and 80% employment rate

  23. Policy directions • Target monetary policy on job creation • Rediscover job creation / labour demand as well as supply / employability • Prioritise social investment in public spending • Stronger employment support and job creation for specific groups • Stronger counter-cyclical options e.g. more focus on job retention in future downturns

More Related