1 / 13

Demonstrating the emittance – momentum matrix A second look at December’s beam line data

AMDG. Demonstrating the emittance – momentum matrix A second look at December’s beam line data. Mark Rayner 12 January 2009. Introduction – The MICE beam line. Initial 4D e N (mm). 3. 6. 10. Absorber P z (MeV/c). 140. Data. 200. 240. D1. D2. Cooling channel

paniz
Download Presentation

Demonstrating the emittance – momentum matrix A second look at December’s beam line data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AMDG Demonstrating the emittance – momentum matrixA second look at December’s beam line data Mark Rayner 12 January 2009 MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  2. Introduction – The MICE beam line Initial 4D eN (mm) 3 6 10 Absorber Pz (MeV/c) 140 Data 200 240 D1 D2 Cooling channel and spectrometers Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 DK sol Target TOF0 TOF1 Diffuser • Purpose: generate the elements of the “emittance-momentum matrix” • Study performance at every portion of a full cooling channel • Can we use the TOFs to demonstrate the matrix elements? MICE note 176 Apollonio, Cobb MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  3. Timing detectors TOF0 and TOF1 0.48 m 0.48 m 7 x 6cm scintillator bars sx = 1.73 cm st = 50 ps 10 x 4cm scintillator bars sx = 1.15 cm st = 50 ps Tof-0 Tof-1 MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  4. Beam characterization using the TOFs at TOF1 at the diffuser phase ellipse orientation phase ellipse orientation longitudinal momentum emittance emittance path length trans mom beam size z g0 PID MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  5. PID on December’s scaled pm decay beam line data Kevin’s optics 6-200 Runs 1380-1397 and 1391-1393 Intermediate momentum beam line with scaled quad currents Runs 1407-1408 6-140 (rescaled currents) Runs 1409-1411 MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  6. Reconstruction procedure • Iterative calculation of increasingly good s=Dz+d and P • Begin with P from P/E=Dz/t • 1 Calculate a linear transfer map at P from TOF0 to TOF1 (top hat quadrupoles) • 2 Deduce x0’ and y0’ from x1 and y1 • 3 Integrate ds while tracking the initial trace space vector through the beam line • 4 Make a better estimate of P from P/E=s/t • 5 Make a small Bethe-Bloch correction for the energy loss in air between the TOFs Marco’s=6mm pabsorber=200 MeV/c centre of the e-p matrix beam MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  7. 6-200 momentum reconstruction Det. resp. Dt (blue) looks surprisingly good compared to the truth (light blue), but there is indeed a 70 ps error MC truth (and hence the reconstructed detector response of the truth) and data have slightly different geometries and optics, but both have been designed by Marco to generate the 6-200 element of the e-p matrix Momentum is reconstructed just before TOF1 The simulation contains only muons Slide 5 shows show the data cut on Dt to select muons Old geometry (May 2009, simulation) Dz = 796.61 cm New geometry (December 2009, data) Dz = 779.91 cm Difference = 16.7 cm = 0.557 ns / c MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  8. x and y trace space Truth Recon’d det. sim. Data MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  9. (Raw) RMS trace emittances from the 2D histograms Binned truth x RMS trace emittance = 2.367800 mm y RMS trace emittance = 1.453120 mm Transverse 4d RMS trace emittance = 1.854912 mm Reconstruction of detector response simulation x RMS trace emittance = 2.552532 mm y RMS trace emittance = 1.123380 mm Transverse 4d RMS trace emittance = 1.693359 mm Data x RMS trace emittance = 2.309358 mm y RMS trace emittance = 0.933133 mm Transverse 4d RMS trace emittance = 1.467971 mm MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  10. Extra slides MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  11. Momentum measurement by the TOFs Muon energy approximately constant between TOFs p/E = s/t s = path length between TOF0 and TOF1 (~8m) t = time of flight (~29ns at 250 MeV/c) Predicted resolution 4.7 MeV/c at 250 MeV/c Bias on the measurement Time of flight mis-calibration by 10 ps: 0.57 MeV/c bias Path length over/underestimation by 10 mm: 2.1 MeV/c bias Positron calibration is necessary s - L (mm) px (MeV/c) x (mm) s - L (mm) py (MeV/c) y (mm) MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  12. Monte Carlo simulation • P/E=s/t where s=true path length • Measures true p before TOF1 with RMS error 0.65 MeV/c • See right histogram • Width and bias due to dE/dx in the air between TOF0 and TOF1 Marco’s=6mm pabsorber=200 MeV/c centre of the e-p matrix beam MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

  13. Should we simply approximate s=Dz? • P/E=Dz/t • RMS error 3.38 MeV/c • Bias -4.06 MeV/c • Due to the width of the d=s-Dz distribution Marco’s=6mm pabsorber=200 MeV/c centre of the e-p matrix beam MICE analysis meeting – BL analysis

More Related