1 / 7

Navigating Flood Risk Communication Between Academia and Practitioners

This study examines challenges and solutions in communicating flood risk information between researchers and practitioners, highlighting the need for tailored tools and enhanced collaboration to bridge the gap effectively.

palma
Download Presentation

Navigating Flood Risk Communication Between Academia and Practitioners

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Communicating flood risk science at the academic-practitioner interface Are we lost in translation? Meghan Alexander * Hazel Faulkner * Christophe Viavattene * Sally Priest * Simon McCarthy

  2. Increased flood risk • Mounting pressures on a broader base of practitioners, with less formal training in flood science • Identify knowledge gaps and future research • Science-practitioner communication • Pressure to deliver pragmatic flood research The need for communication…

  3. Barriers to communication… • Scientific complexityVs practitioner simplicity • Understanding the professional context – roles, responsibilities, constraints and institutional frameworks • Assumptions and expectations

  4. Expanding communication ‘toolkits’ • * The growth of Decision Support Systems and visualisation • WP3.2 sought to tailor a GIS-based flood risk assessment tool to emergency professionals • Highlighted the success of animation • Desire for interactive vulnerability assessment; user-controlled rather than expert-defined • Debates surrounding simplicity: K.I.S.S – Keep It Simple Stupid • Simplistic-user friendly tools and/or simplistic information tools? • WP7.3 FRMRC 1 – 4 day real-time simulation of an extreme flood event • A range of new tools are required to meet the different communication needs of emergency managers.

  5. Taking pragmatic flood research forward… • The future of visualisation and DSS • Tailoring flood research • The role of the ‘end-user’ – not a passive receiver of knowledge, but an active participant in the research process and co-producer of knowledge • The importance of “Knowledge transfer” • Jointly assess knowledge gaps • Mutual learning • Facilitate uptake of new ideas, technologies and tools in FRM

  6. Taking pragmatic flood research forward… • To what extent should we tailor flood research? • Who determines the level of detail required? • How do we negotiate sacrifices? • To what extent can decision support tools be integrated into FRM toolkit? • How might these instruments change the requirements of end-users? The nature of decision making?

  7. Acknowledgement The research reported in this presentation was conducted as part of the Flood Risk Management Research Consortium with support from the: • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council • Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs/Environment Agency Joint Research Programme • United Kingdom Water Industry Research • Office of Public Works Dublin • Northern Ireland Rivers Agency Data were provided by the EA and the Ordnance Survey.

More Related