1 / 28

Reducing Drug related harm

Reducing Drug related harm. Trevor McCarthy Paul Hammond & Tim Murray 4 April 2008. Harm Reduction isn’t new so …. . Why now? What is being done? What will be done? Paul: NEXMS Tim: Good Practice Guidance - forthcoming. Harm reduction: a fresh impetus.

Download Presentation

Reducing Drug related harm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reducing Drug related harm Trevor McCarthy Paul Hammond & Tim Murray 4 April 2008

  2. Harm Reduction isn’t new so …. • Why now? • What is being done? • What will be done? • Paul: NEXMS • Tim: Good Practice Guidance - forthcoming

  3. Harm reduction: a fresh impetus • Reducing drug related harm: an action plan • Health Care Commission Improvement Review • Clinical guidelines • NICE clinical guidelines, technology appraisals & public health intervention guidance • Target to reduce deaths by 20% 1999-2004 not met (9%)

  4. BBV [Blood Borne Viruses] • Hep C: 90% in England associated injecting drug use. 40%+ of injectors in treatment are HCV +ve • Hep B: 34% associated with IDU. 32% of injectors in treatment HBV +ve. Vaccinate against Hep B • HIV: est. 1 : 50 IDUs in UK living with HIV – 1 : 20 injectors in London (one in 150 outside London) Around ⅓ of IDUs inject Crack. Increase in HCV among injectors associated with homelessness, groin injecting & crack injection. Shooting Up. Infections among injecting drug users in the United Kingdom 2006. An update: October 2007. HPA. Testing Times. HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the UK 2007. HPA.

  5. From the NTA 2007 user satisfaction survey 1 Users significantly more likely to have received harm reduction advice & interventions in past 3 months if: • Report ‘current’ injecting • Had a care plan esp. if reviewed in past 3 months • On an opiate substitution programme • Have regular contact with a keyworker

  6. From the NTA 2007 user satisfaction survey 2 Their unmet harm reduction needs included: • Training in overdose management and prevention (33%) • General health assessment (27.7%) • Checking injecting sites (24.3%) • Hepatitis B immunisation (20.5%)

  7. 2007 suite of evidence based clinical guidance

  8. Messages: • Reducing harm should be part of all patient care. • All drug misusers should be offered hepatitis B and A vac • All drug misusers should be offered testing & if required, treatment for hepatitis C and HIV infections (inc. prisons) • Retaining patients in optimised treatment is protective against overdose. • This protection may be enhanced by other interventions including training drug misusers and their families / carers in the risks of overdose, OD prevention and how to respond in an emergency. • Alcohol treatment & smoking cessation for those who need it

  9. I have a dream

  10. I have a Reducing drug-related harm action plan

  11. New Reducing Drug-related harm action plan • Increase surveillance and monitoring • Improving Needle Exchange and drug treatment delivery • Public Health campaigns focusing on those most at risk

  12. Create New Service Provider/ Service Provider Maintenance (NEX Coordinator and National User)

  13. What the National Needle Exchange Monitoring System [NEXMS] will do • Facilitate the collection of data that will support: • Identification of trends in hepatitis C transmission • Better estimates of prevalence and incidence • Ability to measure the effectiveness of prevention measures, such as NEX and related HR interventions • Provide information to inform needs assessment • The system goes live in April 2008

  14. Good practice in harm reduction Learning from the 2006/07 service reviews Tim Murray

  15. What’s involved in the service reviews • Healthcare Commission and NTA • Reviewing all DATs • Assessment against the assessment framework • Targeted follow-up in poor performing areas • Commissioning and harm reduction

  16. The review criteria • 10 criteria in total • Four for harm reduction • Harm reduction embedded in the whole system • Service users have good access to harm reduction services • Action taken to reduce drug-related deaths • Staff are competent to deliver harm reduction

  17. Process for producing the Good practice in harm reduction report • Identify the areas that scored well in the review • Select a number of these areas to interview • Range of different types of DATs • Spoke to a range of stakeholders in these areas • Identified common themes across the interviews

  18. Factors influencing good practice (1) • Criterion 7:Harm reduction is embedded in the whole system • Drug treatment seen as harm reduction • Good co-ordination of harm reduction interventions • How the DATs use resources and contracts

  19. Factors influencing good practice (2) • Criterion 8:Service users have prompt and flexible access to needle exchange services, vaccination, testing and treatment for BBV • Access to services – out of hours, outreach • Wide range of interventions available • Distribution and return of injecting equipment • Good use of pharmacy needle exchange • Range of BBV interventions and treatment pathways

  20. Factors influencing good practice (3) • Criterion 9:Action is taken to reduce the number of drug-related deaths • Serious incident investigations • Campaigns • Work with people leaving prison • Ambulance protocols • Relationship with local coroners

  21. Factors influencing good practice (4) • Criterion 10:Staff are competent to deliver effective harm reduction services • Drug treatment and specialist harm reduction staff • Pharmacists and pharmacy support • Non-treatment workers • Consistency of staffing

  22. Factors influencing good practice (5) • Other relevant factors • having a harm reduction strategy • Harm reduction data collection and use • Harm reduction services co-ordination • Service user and carer involvement

  23. And finally… • Echoes the points made at the NCIDU conference • Harm reduction across the treatment system • Revision and final publication • Poster at the IHRA conference

  24. So … • Now is the time for a renewed focus on harm reduction • Enhancing whole treatment systems The wider environment: • The new drug strategy • Clinical governance • Value for money

  25. More equipment Change behaviour Competent staff Target OD training Improve general health Reduce Hep B More access to Hep C / HIV testing and treatment Target those most at risk Treatment is protective Better understanding of drug related deaths Key messages

  26. And it continues… • Harm reduction training for primary care • Campaign launch • Training DVD for those working with IDUs • Prisons training • Regional user champions

More Related