Why the Nation’s Graduation Challenge Matters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

orsin
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Why the Nation’s Graduation Challenge Matters PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Why the Nation’s Graduation Challenge Matters

play fullscreen
1 / 52
Download Presentation
Presentation Description
76 Views
Download Presentation

Why the Nation’s Graduation Challenge Matters

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. THE HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION CHALLENGEWHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE CAUSESWHAT’S WORKINGJOANNA H. FOXNOVEMBER 17, 2011ATLANTA, GA

  2. Why the Nation’s Graduation Challenge Matters • There is no work in the 21st century without a high school diploma and little work to support a family without some post-secondary schooling or training • This cuts off individual’s access to the American Dream, fractures communities, and weakens the nation

  3. The Size of the Nation’s Graduation Challenge • 4 million high school students in class of 2010 • 3 million will receive diplomas • 75 percent overall graduation rate • 60 percent graduation rate for low income and minority students • Grad gap = approximately 1 million students annually without high school diplomas • U.S. is now 16th in the world for 25-34 year olds with college degrees

  4. Dropping Out is a Challenge Across the Country: Class of 2006 Promoting Power of High Schools by County

  5. Progress is Possible: Changes in Weak Promoting Power High Schools 2002 to 2009 2002 2009 Change Change in # of students Number of schools • TX 240 159 -81 -84,162 • SC 100 59 -41 -42,561 • TN 63 24 -39 -36,160 • AL 74 41 -33 -20,427 • IL 62 36 -26 -33.190 • FL 163 138 -25 -64.556 • GA 154 130 -24 -21,462 • MS 62 42 -20 -11,231 • KY 42 22 -20 -16,246 • NC 108 92 -16 -13,590 Total 1068 743 -325 -343,585 National 2022 1627 -395 -586,020


  6. A U.S. Cohort, from Grade 1 to Diploma

  7. A Georgia Cohort – from Grade 1 to Diploma

  8. Georgia’s Trends by Different Measures Sample Text

  9. Trends –10 County Metro Atlanta and Rest of GA Sample Text

  10. What do we know about the reasons youth drop out of school?

  11. Indicators and Influencers of Student Disengagement? (Yes and No?…) Special Education, ESL Standardized Test Scores Poor Attendance Overage: 1–2 years, 2 years+ Behavior Marks Suspensions Course Failure Core Courses Elective Courses Behavior Repeaters Ninth Grade Repeaters Gender Socio-economic Status Parental Education

  12. Dropouts’ Reasons For Leaving School Without a DiplomaTop Factors Identified by Dropouts (Silent Epidemic)

  13. Early Dropouts’ Reports About Why They Leave Before 10th Grade Ends ))) Boys Girls • Didn’t like school 58% 44% • Couldn’t get along with teachers 52% 17% • Felt didn’t belong at school 31% 14% • Couldn’t get along with peers 18% 22% • Suspended too often 19% 13% • Failing school 46% 33% • Couldn’t keep up with work 38% 25% • Consult Grad Nation Tool 12 for further data. Source of table is NELS:88. Two Years Later, National Center for Education Statistics From NELS 88: Two Years Later: Cognitive Gains and School Transitions (an on-going longitudinal study by the National Center for Education Statistics) Consult Grad Nation Tool 12, for a more complete table

  14. What We’ve Learned • Unlike the common cold, symptoms of dropping out don’t just “go away” over time • Dropping out is a long slow process • Students signal that they are disengaging or are disengaged from very early on • This gives us many years to intervene • Schools can’t do it alone

  15. Trends –10 County Metro Atlanta and Rest of GA Sample Text

  16. Indicators K-12

  17. A B Early Warning Indicators of Student Disengagement – the ABC’s B C Attendance Behavior Course Performance Student Engagement

  18. Quantifying the ABC’s • Attendance – Missing more than 20 days or 10 percent of school • Behavior – Two or more behavior incidents, or moderate but sustained classroom misbehavior • Course-passing – Failing math or English in grades 6-9

  19. Students Chronically Absent in Kindergarten & 1st Grade Much Less Likely to Read Proficiently in 3rd Grade Source: Applied Survey Research & Attendance Works (April 2011)

  20. Chronically Absent Sixth Graders Have Lower Graduation Rates Dropout Rates by Sixth Grade Attendance(Baltimore City Public Schools, 1990–2000 Sixth Grade Cohort) Severely Chronically Absent Chronically Absent NotChronically Absent Source: Baltimore Education Research Consortium SY 2009–2010

  21. Outcomes for Students with One or More Suspensions in Sixth Grade: Philadelphia

  22. From Fast Facts www.mdrc.org

  23. 9th Grade Indicators Students who miss two or more weeks per semester during 9th grade flunk on average at least two classes – even if these students come to 9th grade with high test scores (Allensworth and Easton, 2007, Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago)

  24. Other Ninth Grade Indicators of Dropout Risk • Ninth graders with less than a C - average are more likely to drop out than to graduate. • Ninth graders with GPAs in the C – to D+ range (about ¼ of all ninth graders) who miss 1 to 2 weeks of school per semester need extensive support. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allensworth, E. M., & Easton, J. Q. (July, 2007). What Matters for Staying On-Track and Graduating in Chicago Public High Schools: A Close Look at Course Grades, Failures, and Attendance in the Freshman Year. Research Report. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.

  25. The Challenge How can we, as school, district, and community leaders, policymakers and practitioners use what we know about current dropout trends and the cost of dropping out – for individuals and for our community -- to motivate greater change in our schools, districts, region and state?

  26. High rates of chronic absence often go unnoticed • In NYC 200,000 students miss a month of more of school • In Maryland, 83,000 do so -- nearly 20 percent of high school students • In Baltimore, 40 percent of students in a 6th grade cohort missed a year or more of schooling over a five year period

  27. Accelerating Progress is Possible Recent developments make accelerated progress possible: • Common graduation rate calculations across schools, districts, and states for the first time • Spread of early warning systems • Enhanced state and city leadership • National non-profits & businesses focused on increasing high school graduation rates • Unprecedented federal support to transform dropout factories & feeder schools

  28. Civic Marshall Plan Benchmarks of Progress • To earn 600,000 more diplomas for the Class of 2020 than the Class of 2008, we set benchmarks along the way: • By 2012, more students reading on grade level by beginning of 5th grade; chronic absenteeism significantly reduced; needs assessments conducted for all dropout factory communities • By 2013, each low graduation school district has an early warning & intervention system; re-design of middle schools; a non-profit mentor for every 15-20 off-track students • By 2016, all dropout factories are being transformed or replaced; transition student supports in grades 8-10; compulsory school age increased to 18 in all states; clear pathways to college and career

  29. Civic Marshall Plan -- Postsecondary Readiness • Ensure students graduate high school prepared for postsecondary and career success • College on-track goals for the Class of 2020: • During Junior Year, students take college placement exams • During the 1st semester of Senior Year, students apply to a postsecondary institution • By April 1, Grade 12 students complete the FAFSA application for financial aid

  30. What’s Working Nationwide? • Using data • Changes in policy • Changes in practice • Public awareness • Superintendents, principals, teachers and others in schools and districts focus improvement efforts • Community members, businesses and volunteers collaborate with schools and districts

  31. 3-Tiered Intervention Model • School-wide: 75-100% of youth • Targeted: 1:15 to 1:20 adult/youth ratio • Intensive: 1:1 to 1:5 adult/youth ratio involving specialists (counselors, social workers, tutors) for the 5 to 15% of youth who need case-managed support

  32. Link Early Warning Systems to Tiered Interventions • Use the data • Focus on identification and then intervention • Respond to the first signs that a student is falling off track • Build relationships and systematically apply school-wide preventative, targeted and then intensive interventions until student is on-track • Recognize and build on student strengths • Provide time, training, and support to teachers • Match resources to student needs but practice intervention discipline • Evaluate the effectiveness of interventions

  33. The Diplomas Now partners harness and combine their unique assets to keep students on track college and career ready • On-Track Indicator and Intervention System: • Research-based and validated interventions of increasing intensity are employed until student is back on track to graduation. Interventions are constantly evaluated for their effectiveness.

  34. Diplomas Now Sample Results: Philadelphia Middle Schools Diplomas Now partnered with three Philadelphia high poverty middle schools in 2009-2010. These schools average 615 students, 84% of whom are eligible to receive free or reduced price lunch. Below are the aggregate results for all three schools from the 2009-10 School year. Attendance Course Performance Behavior # of Students with less than 80% Attendance # of Students with 3 or more negative behavior marks # of Students receiving an F in Math or English 60 Math 82% Reduction 100 52% Reduction 35 55% Reduction 50 30 English 80 40 25 60 20 30 15 40 78% Reduction 20 10 20 10 5 0 0 0 June 2009 June 2010 June 2009 June 2010 June 2009 June 2010

  35. Schools + Communities CAN Make a Difference Characteristics of Successful Attendance Initiatives • Partner with community agencies to help families carry out their responsibility to get children to school. • Make attendance a priority, set targets and monitor progress over time. • Engage parents and students in identifying and addressing school, family, and community issues that contribute to chronic absence. • Clearly communicate expectations for attendance to students and families. • Begin early, ideally in Pre-K. • Combine targeted interventions with universal strategies that nurture an engaged learning environment, build a culture of attendance and ensure physical health and safety at school. • Offer positive supports before punitive action.

  36. National Efforts United Way – 1 million new adult volunteers Communities in Schools – program expansion BGCA– outcome-driven focus and BE GREAT: Graduate! NASBE – Project Pass NCSL – Task Force on School Dropout Prevention and Recovery City Year – national alignment to CMP benchmarks

  37. National Efforts AT&T – CMP funding and support; data-driven enterprise Bush Institute – Middle School Matters Jobs for the Future – Back on Track to College program Target – Read With Me initiative Annie E. Casey Foundation – Campaign for Grade Level Reading Pearson – CMP funding and support NSBA – Data First training for school boards Big Brothers Big Sisters: -- national alignment to CMP

  38. Room for Growth in Efforts • Tutoring • Summer School • Remediation • Guided Study Hall/Academic Support • Alternative Schools or Programs • After-School Programs Source of data in the next six slides: Dropout Prevention Services and Programs in Public School Districts: 2010-2011, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics

  39. At Least One Elementary School per District Offers: SE All, 20%+ poverty • Tutoring 93% 85% • Summer School 56% 61% • Remediation classes 76% 62% • Guided study/acad 27%32% • Alt. schools/programs 30% 25% • After-school programs 57% 50%

  40. At Least One Middle School per District Offers: SE All regions, 20%+ poverty • Tutoring 95% 86% • Summer School 65% 61% • Remediation classes 82% 70% • Guided study/acad. support 61%53% • Alternative schools/programs 76% 49% • After-school programs 57% 52%

  41. At Least One High School per District Offers: SE All regions, 20% poverty • Tutoring 95% 88% • Summer School 77% 68% • Remediation classes 89% 80% • Guided study/acad. support 27%59% • Alternative schools, programs 30% 76% • After-school programs 57% 47%

  42. What Does Data Tell Us About Support During Transitions? SE All, 20%+ poverty ES/MS, student mentor 8%7% ES/MS, adult mentor 14%13% ES/MS, advisement class 23%17% MS/HS, student mentor 13%15% MS/HS, adult mentor 27%30% MS/HS, advisement class49%36% Source: Op cit, Table 5

  43. Characteristics of Adults Who Offer Support in 20%+ Poverty Schools • Counselors, teachers & administrators who formally mentor students 63%, 68%, 76% (ES, MS, HS) • Adults employed by the district whose only job is to mentor students 9%, 11%, 16% (ES, MS, HS) • Community volunteers 36%, 34%, 34% (ES, MS, HS) Source: Op cit, Table 6

  44. Examples of What’s Working in Georgia

  45. Winning Hearts and Minds • Does everyone in the various communities – the school, the district, the parents, the students, the educators, the business community -- agree that high school completion ready for college and careers is necessary? • Does everyone agree that all students should tackle and succeed at rigorous curriculum? That students should be supported rather than “sink or swim?” That students may need help in getting to school and staying in it?

  46. Policy and Practices Inventory Do policies and practices support graduation for all, specifically supporting students in staying in school and learning at high levels, not enabling students to leave or pushing them out? Do policies and practices support efforts to overcome difficult-to-change attitudes?