290 likes | 411 Views
This work explores the tension between individual autonomy and societal norms. It delves into how individuals, while seeking personal identity and societal belonging, often experience feelings of unsociability. This emotional conflict can lead to resistance, negotiation, or even isolation. It advocates for the creation of personal moral frameworks, contributing to the ideals of democracy, equality, and cultural development. Highlighting the Nordic co-operative model, it emphasizes political, economic, and social cultures that foster positive interactions, trust, and collaboration across communities.
E N D
The unsociablesociability • The individual is a part societies, wantsto be, needto be; • At the same time the individualrecognizethathe is unsocial, becausethere is always a feeling or thoughtsthateveryoneshouldadjustto ”me”, or ”to my idea”, whichleadresistance, negotiation, isolation, or evenviolence • Individualslearn from this and develop moral standards, norms , legal framework, institutions, processes...
There is alwayshope! • The individualcan and do createhisownlaws, he has the autonomi to do that. The individual must decidewhat is right or wrong, good or bad (The categoricalimperative). • It is a freedomthatcommits, the situation ”push and pull” , it is conditions for develop”rulesof the game or relations”. • Thisstrengthen the ideaofdemocracy, equality, moral education, individuality and the existential paradox ofunsocialablesociability
The Nordic co-operative way It is not a place It is…A wayofthinking A wayofdoing A wayofrelating A wayofexperience A wayoffeeling
What is Culture in thiscontext? Simplified: Knowledge Thinking Values and norms Enviroment Relations Acting
Culturalheritage is about… • Politicalcultureofdemocracy, negotiation, diplomacy, secularstate, defence (not aggressive militarypower), peace and work for securityetc • Economiccultureof market and mixed economy, public health and sustainibility • Social cultureofwelfare stat, social investment state, healthylifestyle, leadership and organizationetc • The cultureofpeople movements, peopleeducation, democratizationofeducation, art, artefactsetc • Humanistic culture, the autonomous and freeindividual, welleducated, social and co-operative, promoted and supported by state and etc • The ideaof social contract: Between independent individuals in familrelations, organisations , localmunicipalities, states
The Nordic co-operative wayEquality, individuality, social trust Democracy – politicalbodies KnowledgePeopletopeople- evaluationPeopleeducation Media TeachersProducers/actorsSchools - resources - activities - output - outcome - impact
Experience on interaction WeakStrong • Poorknowledge - Goodknowledge • Weaknetwork - Densenetwork • Different ”languages” - Common • Different norms and - Similarattitudes • Different vision - Shared vision • Low trust - High trust • Negative incentiveto - positive incentivescollaboratetocollaborate
EU:s strategy for Baltic Sea Strategy The first makroregional strategy Adress common challanges Demand co-operation och co-ordination betweenmemberstates Needpolitical support, commitment and ownership EUSBSR is a part of EU2020.
EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen Styrning
EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen The strategy in practice? COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK for 2014-2020: European Structural and Investment Funds (ERDF, ESF, CF, EMFF, EAFRD) SEED MONEY FACILITIES: Swedish Institute, IB.SH, CBSS, Nordic Council of Ministers OTHER EUROPEAN UNION FUNDS: Connecting Europe Facility, Horizon 2020, LIFE + programme, COSME, Erasmus for all, new environment action programme, etc. OTHER INSTRUMENTS: e.g. International Banks, national, regional and local funds, private funds and investments, funding resources provided by international institutions, etc.
Focus on the goodlife, human and citizen right togetherwitheffective problem solutions 6 5 4 1 2 3
Motivesbehind participation? • Moral/normative participation. Believe in the values, ethics , idea • Calculated participation: ”What´s in it for me?” • Pragmatic participation: Does it work? Will there be some resultat? • Alienatedparticipation: I have no identifikation, do not understand, but I am part of it by tradition etc
Whyparticipate? • Public good • Partner in policy- and decisionmaking • To feelaffinity • To have the status as a equal partner in problemsolving (remeber the existantial paradox) • Reduced risk, or increasedsecurity or safety
MAKRO ”Owner” Producers MESO/MIKRO
Program x EU ”Crossboarder Makroregional Team, projects” National Regions Local Units Individuals
Important is • Solveactual and relevant problems • Relievethrough service • Facilitate- towrite and adminstrateprojects - tofindfunding - tofindknowledge - tofind partners • Promotedecideddevelopment • Prevent risks • Look afterinterest, engagemant • Supportthrough co-operation, experts • RepresentPR, lobbying etc
Impact-culture! 6 5 4 1 2 3
PoliticalimpactGoals and meansLevel Economicimpact ” ” ” Social impact ” ” ” Culturalimpact ” ” ” Knowledge – values – environment- collaboration
Attitude • The ”system” in open in bothends • There is room for improvement • It is a work in progress • Wecan make it better • Weareabletosolve problems • Wetake charge of different opions and interest and find common solutions • There is no suchthing as a definitive form • The currentstructure is not the only right one • Wehavetohave a balancedinsightinto the challangesahead • Wehavetohave an intelligent responsestothem • ”Welcomeaboard, everyonecancontribute”
Message ”Identity” From Process Solution, models Towards Co-operation