1 / 27

OSD Perspectives

OSD Perspectives. 39 th Annual Guns & Ammunition / Missiles & Rockets Conference & Exhibition April 13, 2004 Anthony J. Melita OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Defense Systems, Land Warfare and Munitions. OSD Organization DoD Transformation

oren
Download Presentation

OSD Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OSD Perspectives 39th Annual Guns & Ammunition / Missiles & Rockets Conference & Exhibition April 13, 2004 Anthony J. Melita OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Defense Systems, Land Warfare and Munitions

  2. OSD Organization DoD Transformation Requirements and Acquisition Process Changes

  3. UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS) (Acting) Honorable Michael W. Wynne 695-2381 3E933 ____________________________________________________ PRINCIPAL DEPUTY Honorable Michael W. Wynne 697-7021 3E1006 DUSD, INSTALLATIONS & ENVIRONMENT Mr. Ray DuBois 3E792 695-2880 DIR, ACQUISITION RESOURCES & ANALYSIS Dr. Nancy L. Spruill 3E1025 614-5737 DIR, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Mr. Alfred G. Volkman 3A280 697-4172 EXEC DIR, DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD Mr. Brian Hughes 3D865 695-4157 DIR, ADMINISTRATION Ms. Julie K. Bigler 3D1020 697-2525 DIR, SPECIAL PROGRAMS RADM(L) Richard P. Terpstra, USN 3D1064 697-1282 DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (ACQUISITION & TECHNOLOGY) Honorable Michael W. Wynne 3E1006 697-7021 ATSD NUCLEAR & CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAMS Honorable Dale E. Klein 3E1074 697-1771 DIRECTOR DEFENSE RESEARCH & ENGINEERING Honorable Ronald Sega 3E1014 697-5776 DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (LOGISTICS & MATERIEL READINESS) Honorable Diane Morales 3E808 697-5531 DIRECTOR MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY Lt Gen Ronald T. Kadish, USAF NAVY ANNEX 695-6344 ADUSD, TRANSPORTATION POLICY Mr. Earl B. Boyanton, Jr. CGN 210A 601-4461 ADUSD, SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION Mr. Alan Estevez CGN 210B 604-0098 DUSD, INDUSTRIAL POLICY Miss Suzanne Patrick 3E1060 697-0051 DIR, DEFENSE SYSTEMS Dr. Glenn F. Lamartin 3E130 697-9386 DATSD, NUCLEAR MATTERS Mr. Frederick S. Celec 3C125 697-3060 DUSD, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Dr. Charles Holland 3E114 695-0598 DUSD, INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SECURITY Dr. John A. Shaw 3E1034 693-0011 DIR, DEFENSE PROCUREMENT & ACQUISITION POLICY Ms. Deidre A. Lee 3E1044 695-7145 DATSD, CHEM/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE Dr. Anna Johnson-Winegar 3C257 693-9410 DUSD, ADVANCED SYSTEMS & CONCEPTS Ms. Sue C. Payton 3E144 697-6446 ADUSD, MAINTENANCE POLICY, PROGRAM & RESOURCES MATERIEL READINESS Mr. Robert T. Mason 3B915 697-7980 ADUSD, LOGISTICS PLANS & PROGRAMS Mr. Louis A. Kratz 2C263 614-6327 DATSD, NUCLEAR TREATY PROGRAMS (Vacant) Wilson Blvd 588-1983 DUSD, LABORATORIES & BASIC SCIENCES Dr. John Hopps, Jr. 3E114 692-4592 ADUSD, LOGISTICS SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT Ms. Laura A. Faught CGN 406 604-0157 DIR, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY VADM Keith W. Lippert, USN FT BEL 767-5200 DIR, SMALL & DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION Mr. Frank Ramos RPN Suite 9100 588-8620 DIR, DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY BG Ed Harrington, USA 6350 Walker LA 428-1703 DIR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY Dr. Stephen Younger (IPA) FT BEL 767-4883 DIR, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY Dr. Anthony Tether VSB 983 696-2400

  4. DEFENSE SYSTEMS ORGANIZATION DS Defense Systems Asst for DS Planning Director Dr. Glenn Lamartin Principal Deputy Mr. Mark Schaeffer Asst for DS Projects SE SA SMI Systems Engineering Systems Acquisition Systems and Mission Integration Director: Mr. Schaeffer Director: Dr. Lamartin Director: Dr. Garber Development Test & Evaluation Enterprise Development Assessments & Support Joint Force Application Joint Force Integration Joint Force Operations Land Warfare & Munitions Treaty Compliance Air Warfare Naval Warfare Missile Warfare

  5. Transformation

  6. Transformation “…a future force that is defined less by size and more by mobility and swiftness, one that is easier to deploy and sustain, one that relies more heavily on stealth, precision weaponry and information technologies.” George W. Bush

  7. The Emerging American Military*: More expeditionary (lighter, more lethal) More networked (more interoperability at the JTF level) Designed to leverage the exterior positions (precision from distance as sensors move in) Leverages increasingly persistent ISR Tighter sensor-shooter timelines (sensing, C2, fly-out) Values Information Superiority (information operations) Focused on unmanned capabilities (UAV, UCAV, UUV, robotics) * Transforming Defense….General Observations, Office of Force Transformation

  8. Transformed culture through innovative leadership Strong commitment from senior leaders Transformed processes Reformed capabilities-identification process (joint operating concepts) Strategic analysis that can identify and assess risks for strategic planning Transformed capabilities through force transformation Strategy for Transforming Source: DoD Transformation Planning Guidance, April 2003

  9. Transforming how we fight Joint warfighting concepts Doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel and facilities. Transforming how we do business Legislative reforms Requirements generation and acquisition processes Adaptive war planning Transforming how we work with others Coordination among agencies (federal, state, local) Allied and coalition partners Scope of Transformation Source: DoD Transformation Planning Guidance, April 2003

  10. Requirements and Acquisition Process Changes

  11. Acquisition Decision Support Systems In Transformation Revolutionary Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System (JCIDS) CJCS 3170.01C 24 June 03 VCJCS/Service Chief Oversight MID 913 PPBS to PPBE 22 May 03 Evolutionary Defense Acquisition System Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution Process (PPBE) Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Oversight Emerging DEPSECDEF Oversight DoD 5000 Series 12 May 03 Revision

  12. Summary of Changes Enhance methodology to identify and to describe capabilities gaps Engage the acquisition community earlier Better define non-material aspects of material solutions Prioritize capability gaps and proposals Improved coordination with other departments and agencies Mandate broader review of capability proposals Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System

  13. Functional Capabilities Boards Responsibilities • Ensure new capabilities are conceived and developed in joint warfighting context • Ensure JCIDS proposals are consistent with integrated joint force • Validate Joint Impact proposals • Organize, analyze & prioritize capabilities proposals • Oversee development and update of Functional Concept(s) • Ensure integrated architectures (as available) reflect functional area • 7 Chartered by JROC: • Command & Control (JFCOM); • Battlespace Awareness (J2); • Force Application (J8); • Focused Logistics (J4) • Protection (J8) • Network Centric (J6) • Force Management (J8) More Efficient Use of Scarce Department Resources

  14. Functional Capability Area Portfolios • Battlespace Awareness • JS J-2 • Portfolio • All source intel collection • Environmental data collection • Knowledge management • Predictive analysis • Command & Control • JFCOM J-8 • Portfolio • SJFHQ • DJC2 • Collaborative Information Environment • Integrated Fires/Targeting (Combat ID & Integrated Ops Pictures • Effects-based Ops/Planning • Joint Commander Impact Issues (C2) • Net Centric • JS J-6 • Portfolio • IT & NSS systems and integration • Warfighting CCE systems • Cryptographic systems • National-to-tactical C4 integration • Force Application • JS J-8 • Portfolio • Land, maritime, air & space ops • Joint targeting • Conventional and nuclear atk • Close and urban combat • Joint fires • SEAD • Special ops • Information Operations (CNA/CND/EW/ PSYOP/Military Deception/ OPSEC) • Force • Protection • JS J-8 • Portfolio • Personnel and infrastructure protection • Homeland security • Air and Missile Defense • Consequence management • Proliferation control • Focused Logistics • JS J-4 • Portfolio • Deployment/ distribution • Mobility • Sustainment • Force Health Protection • Logistics C2

  15. Services DIA Representative (Intelligence Supportability) Services Combatant Commanders USD (AT&L) USD (I) USecAF (Space) ASD NII/ DOD CIO D, PA&E DIA Representative (Intelligence Supportability) Mission requirements board Executive Secretary Advisory Membership J-6E/I (Interoperability Advisor) J-8 Warfighting Concepts and Architectures Integration DOD Laboratories & Industry Oversight Body Comparison Functional Capabilities Board (FCB) Joint Requirements Panel (JRP) Joint Capabilities Board (JCB) Joint Requirements Board (JRB) Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC)

  16. The Defense Acquisition Management Framework

  17. Streamline Increase Flexibility Enhance Business Practice Emphasize Evolutionary Acquisition Integrate Acquisition Business Model with transformed Requirements Generation System Revised Policy Objectives

  18. Two development processes to implement Evolutionary Acquisition Strategy Incremental Development: End-state requirement is known, and requirement will be met over time in several increments Spiral Development: Desired capability is identified, but end-state requirements are not known at Program Initiation. Requirements for future increments dependent upon technology maturation and user feedback from initial increments Evolutionary acquisition strategies shall be preferred approach to satisfying operational needs. Spiral development shall be the preferred process. Evolutionary Acquisition

  19. Primary Resource Management System for DoD: Articulates strategy Identifies size, structure and equipment for military forces Sets programming priorities Allocates resources Evaluates actual output against planned performance and adjusts resources as appropriate Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution

  20. 4 Administration Years with 2-year PPBE Cycle JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC FY 07-11 “Review and Refinement” Program Budget Review New Admin Off-year DPG Year 1 QDR Prep PCP/BCP Modify Budget Submission (previous administration) Budget Execution (previous administration) * “Formalizing the Agenda” FY 08-13 QDR to Congress Program Budget Review On-year DPG Year 2 POM/BES Budget Submission Year 1 Budget Execution Year 1 “Execution of Guidance” FY 09-13 Program Budget Review Off-year DPG PCP/BCP Year 3 Budget Submission Year 2 Budget Execution Year 2 FY 06-11 “Ensuring the Legacy” Election Program Budget Review On-year DPG Year 4 POM/BES Budget Execution Year 3 Budget Submission Year 3 We are here!

  21. President National Security Council CIA/DIA/JCS/OSD Planning Phase DEC FEB MAR MAY 1st Year 2nd Year COCOM – Combatant Command CPR – Chairman’s Pgm Recommendation JPG – Joint Programming Guidance NSS – National Security Strategy NMS – National Military Strategy QDR – Quadrennial Defense Review SPG – Strategic Planning Guidance 1st year of a new administration NSS CPR SECDEF JCS COCOMs SERVICES SPG NMS DRAFT JPG JPG JCS, OSD, COCOMs, SVC HQs, ETC. Strategy also reflected in QDR

  22. Concurrent Program/Budget Review(“On-year”) NOV JAN/FEB AUG OCT DEC BES – Budget Estimate Submission COCOM – Combatant Command CPA – Chairman’s Pgm Assessment DRB – Defense Resources Board MBI – Major Budget Issues PB – President’s Budget PBD – Program Budget Decision PDM – Program Decision Memo POM – Program Objectives Memo OSD/ OMB Issue Resolution POM SECDEF DRB PDM CPA JCS Services PEO/PM, SVC HQs COCOMs OSD/ OMB Adv Ques/ Hearings BES PB MBI PBDs Updates FYDP Updates FYDP Services / PEO / PM Answer / Reclama

  23. Off-Year Program/Budget Review NOV JAN/FEB AUG OCT DEC BCP – Budget Change Proposal COCOM – Combatant Command CPA – Chairman’s Pgm Assessment DRB – Defense Resources Board MBI – Major Budget Issues PB – President’s Budget PBD – Program Budget Decision PCP – Program Change Proposal PDM – Program Decision Memo OSD/ OMB Accepted PCP Resolution PCPs SECDEF DRB PDM CPA JCS Services PEO/PM, SVC HQs COCOMs OSD/ OMB Adv Ques/ Hearings BCPs PB MBI PBDs Services / PEO / PM Answer / Reclama

  24. Identify areas to take additional risk (offsets) Offsets may be used for other initiatives Limited to items that exceed $250 million across FYDP Threshold at individual programmatic issue level May address smaller issues if serious programmatic problem If less than $250 million, may submit as BCP if budget year is affected Must comply with PDM decisions Combatant Commanders may submit up to six prioritized PCPs regardless of dollar value Full budgetary data submitted for accepted PCPs Program Change Proposals (PCPs)

  25. Generally limited to fact-of-life changes: Cost increases Schedule delays Management reform savings Workload changes Budget execution experience Congressional action May involve FYDP years if total cost is less than $250 million and budget year is affected Offsets required Backed up with appropriate budget exhibits Budget Change Proposals (BCPs)

  26. Improved integration of business practice Focus on Joint Capabilities Flexible, outcome-based, Acquisition Management Framework PPBE Interface aligned with JCIDS and Acquisition Process Final Thoughts…..Deliver Advanced Technology Faster Improved Business Practices meet the 21ST Century Challenge

More Related