1 / 14

The Natick Soldier Center

The Natick Soldier Center. Organizational Study. Adam Horton, Joy Poisel, Kim McCraw, Nick Zola. RDECOM (One of Seven).

ophrah
Download Presentation

The Natick Soldier Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study Adam Horton, Joy Poisel, Kim McCraw, Nick Zola

  2. Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  3. RDECOM (One of Seven)  AMRDEC       U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Research, Development & Engineering CenterAATD        Aviation Applied Technology DirectorateAMSAA       U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis ActivityARDEC       U.S. Army Armaments Research, Development & Engineering Center  ARL       U.S. Army Research LaboratoryARO        U.S. Army Research Office CERDEC       U.S. Army Communication-Electronics Research & Development Center     ECBC       U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological CenterNSC       U.S. Army Natick Soldier Center   SOSI       Systems of Sytem Integration TARDEC       U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Research, Development & Engineering Center Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  4. General Organization • Began as dedicated Army Lab • Purpose of NSC • To maximize the warrior's survivability sustainability mobility combat effectiveness and quality of life by treating the warrior as a system. • Technology generation • Soldier system generation • Solving field problems • Do not mass produce products Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  5. Personnel / Leadership • Mostly Civilian • Civilian leadership • Education levels • 52 PhDs (2 senior scientists) • 139 MS • 40 interns • Mentorship program • Just reached end of 15 yr. hiring freeze • Transfer of knowledge from expert to student Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  6. Directorates • Individual protection • Combat feeding • Collective protection • Airdrop/Arial delivery • Supporting science and technology (biotechnology, nanotechnology) • Warrior systems technology integration Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  7. Individual Protection Directorate • Covers Research and Development in: • Ballistic Protection • Directed Energy Protection • Environmental Protection • Camouflage • Multi-functional Materials • Chemical/ Biological Protection Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  8. Chemical Technology Team • 18 total members • Supports NSC mission through: • Percutaneous CB Protection • Microclimate Conditioning • Cross-team/project consultation • Cross-functional teams + long standing teams • Long/short-term goals • Determined by technology transition point • Quantified by Technology Readiness Levels (TRL’s) Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  9. Funding • Total NSC Budget of $468 M • Sources • DTRA (Defense Threat Reduction Agency) • MIPT (Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism) • NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology) • Competition within the IPD • Fit of Project to CTT mission Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  10. Marketing • Identify needs? • 1) Government organizations • 2) Homeland defense/First responder community • Separate NSC teams create exhibits and handle marketing • Self-promotion of CTT at Conferences • Feedback throughout development • License products for civilian use Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  11. Production • Projects generally take 2-5 years • Technology push, not consumer pull • Typically long product shelf life • CTT determines product obsolescence • Equipment replacement beyond CTT scope Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  12. Basic Research (ARL, Universities, DARPA) Adv..Development NSC Applied Research ARL/NSC Operational Requirements Ocean, Atmosphere & Earth Sciences Engineering Sciences Technology Superiority Understanding Investment Strategy Focus Option Life Sciences National Security Acquisition Physical & Math Sciences Opportunities Directed Knowledge Engineering/ Operational Knowledge Fundamental Knowledge Process 6.1 6.3 6.2 Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  13. Differences From The Private Sector • Acquisitions of materials, labor and contracting • Political/economic budget dependencies • Classified material vs. trade secrets • Different terms for success: • Transitioning a technology or test methodology • Insight into a specific technical dilemma • Spin off application for a technology • Milestones • No established metrics for quantifying success Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

  14. Thank you • Dianne St. Jean • Dick Brown • Axel E. Rodriguez • Beth McCoy • Pvt. Paul • All NSC staff • Gate Guards • Guys who search Adam’s trunk Natick Soldier Center Organizational Study

More Related