1 / 16

HATE SPEECH

HATE SPEECH. RACE, RELIGION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION. RACE RELATIONS. Law contained in Public Order Act 1986 (as amended at various times) Prosecutions infrequent – must be brought with consent of Att-Gen. We must ask: What does ‘ racial hatred ’ mean?

opal
Download Presentation

HATE SPEECH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HATE SPEECH RACE, RELIGION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION

  2. RACE RELATIONS • Law contained in Public Order Act 1986 (as amended at various times) • Prosecutions infrequent – must be brought with consent of Att-Gen. We must ask: • What does ‘racial hatred’ mean? • Who is covered by the word ‘race’?

  3. THE RELEVANT SECTIONS • S.18 POA 1986 – ‘It is an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with the intent of stirring up racial hatred or in circumstances where racial hatred is likely to be stirred up’ • S.19 – ‘It is an offence to publish threatening abusive or insulting material either with the intention to provoke racial hatred or in circumstances where such hatred is likely to be stirred up’

  4. RACE AND RACIAL HATRED • Racial Hatred = Hatred against a group defined by colour, race or national origin so includes Jews, Sikhs and Romany gypsies NOT Zionists or Rastafarians or Travellers • Hatred means more than offence, ridicule or harassment • Race is not defined by religion

  5. BROADCASTING • S.164 Broadcasting Act 1990 makes it an offence to transmit a TV or radio programme with a view to inciting racial hatred • Does this make it more difficult to make programmes about racial hatred? • Jersild v Denmark (1995) 19 EHRR 1

  6. THEATRE • Productions could be caught by this law but rarely used - what about Merchant of Venice/Othello? • Recent productions have been withdrawn due to pressureNOT the law e.g. Bezhti/Perdition • Possession of material

  7. SOME IMPORTANT POINTS • No need to show racial hatred WAS stirred up ONLY that it might have been • Ironic that some of the early prosecutions were against people from the very sections of society it was intended to protect e.g. Michael X • Views of StokelyCarmichael re institutional racism

  8. R v SHEPPARD • Case decided in 2010 on appeal. Sheppard & Whittle found guilty of inciting racial hatred over internet and with leaflets here sent through post. • Website – heretical.com – hosted in USA. • Both defendants sent to prison

  9. ‘He’s not the messiah……’ • ‘To criticise a person for their race is manifestly irrational and ridiculous but to criticise their religion, that is a right. This is a freedom. The freedom to criticise ideas, any ideas - even if they are sincerely held beliefs – is one of the fundamental freedoms of society & a law which attempts to say you can criticise & ridicule ideas as long as they are not religious is a very peculiar law indeed’

  10. BLASPHEMY AND RELIGIOUS HATRED • Blasphemy now abolished – only ever applied to Anglican Christianity • R v Lemon • Life of Brian • Jerry Springer Opera

  11. Racial & Religious Hatred Act 2006 • Amends Public Order Act 1986 • Offence committed where person intends to stir up hatred on the grounds of religious belief. • Can be against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief ORlack of religious belief

  12. Acts intended to stir up religious hatred • Use of words or behaviour or display of written material • Publishing or distributing written material • Public performance of a play • Distributing showing or playing a recording • Broadcasting or including programme in programme service • Possession of inflammatory material

  13. WHAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THE ACT? • Certainly to prevent speech that incites hatred that may lead to violence • NOT to prevent hurt feelings or mere offence - some disappointment expressed at this when legislation finally passed into law.

  14. Stirring up hatred on grounds of sexual orientation • Offence created by s.74 & schedule 16 of Criminal Justice & Immigration Act 2008 (amends Public Order Act 1986) • Provision entered law in March 2010 • Deals with conduct (words, behaviour or material) which is threatening in nature and likely to stir up hatred against a group of people who are defined by sexual orientation (any) • Does not applyto orientation based on e.g. preference for particular sexual practices/acts – see s.29B POA

  15. THE OFFENCE • Limited to material/conduct that is threatening & which is intended to stir up hatred • Contrast Racial Hatred offences - these cover a wider range of conduct or materialwhich is threatening, abusive or insulting and which is likely to stir up hatred

  16. NO JOKES, THEN? • Human Rights & freedom of expression aspect – should NOT prevent jokes or religious opinion or preaching against certain behaviour BUT how far will this work? Is there a conflict between Art 9 v Art 10? • See R v Ahmed & others 2011 – ‘Death Penalty?’ pamphlets handed out and posted through private letter boxes. All 4 defendants given prison sentences.

More Related