1 / 25

A Study on Content Anycasting for Future Internet

A Study on Content Anycasting for Future Internet. Kyushu University Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering Department of Advanced Information Technology Supervisor: Professor Koji Okamura. Name: Othman Othman M.M. . Outline:. Goal . Current Technologies.

opal
Download Presentation

A Study on Content Anycasting for Future Internet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Study on Content Anycasting for Future Internet Kyushu University Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering Department of Advanced Information Technology Supervisor: Professor Koji Okamura. Name: Othman Othman M.M.

  2. Outline: • Goal . • Current Technologies. • Limitations of Current Technologies. • Anycast Scenario • BitTorrent (P2P) Scenario. • Advantages of Combining Technologies. • How to Combine Technologies. • Applications. • Popular Large File Distribution. • P2P construction. • Conclusion. • Q&A.

  3. 1-Goal: • Nowadays many Future Internet researches, technologies going. • OpenFlow is one of candidate Future Internet technologies. • to create Circuit based like systems. • To support mobility, computing centers …… • Important to show new ways to use OpenFlow to provide new services or improve current ones. • That make use of OpenFlow capabilities other than circuit like. • To have contents with high availability.

  4. 2-Current Technologies: • Peer to Peer: • Depends on user clients to provide service. • Implements an application layer overlay network. • Anycast: • Multiple nodes with the same address (Sa). • Packet sent to (Sa) will be delivered to the node with nearest location. Sa Sa Sa Fig 1. Anycast Fig 2. BitTorrent Source :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Torrentcomp_small.gif

  5. 3-Limitations of Current Technologies: • Peer to Peer: • Overhead because of overlay nature, protocol, peer discovery, and looking up in index. • Service depends on user’s contribution. • Anycast: • All of the content servers must have identical contents. • Lacks the flexibility, and not dynamic. 10.10.10.1 192.168.0.1 Cont 1 Cont 1 Cont 2 Cont 2 Router 1 Cont 3 Cont 3 Router 2 Fig 2. BitTorrent Source : http://computer.howstuffworks.com/bittorrent2.htm Cont n Cont n 10.10.10.1 Router 3 Router 4 192.168.0.2 Destination Next-Hop Distance 192.168.0.0 127.0.0.1 0 10.0.0.1 192.168.0.1 1 10.0.0.1 192.168.0.2 2

  6. 4-Anycast Scenario: 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.1 Client will send packet to 10.10.10..1 10.10.10.1 Cont 1 Cont 1 Cont 1 Cont 2 Cont 2 Cont 2 Network will choose end node based on routing measures Cont 3 Cont 3 Cont 3 10.10.10.1 Cont n Cont n Cont n

  7. 5-BitTorrent (P2P) Scenario: Tracker 100% Seeder 70% 30% 100% Seeder 0%

  8. 6-Advantages of Combining Technologies 1/3: • Anycast. • Content Centric Networks. • Peer to Peer. • Combination of those technologies: • Users contributing in service: to improve the availability, and improves the overall use of bandwidth in whole network. User contribution In Content Anycasting Regular Client/Server

  9. 6-Advantages of Combining Technologies 2/3: • Anycast. • Content Centric Networks. • Peer to Peer. • Combination of those technologies: • Choosing destination by network: to remove the burden of finding destination and thus a faster response. Tracker ? Content Server OpenFlow Router Choosing Destination By Network In Content Anycasting Tracker Role in BitTorrent

  10. 6-Advantages of Combining Technologies 3/3 : • Anycast. • Content Centric Networks. • Peer to Peer. • Combination of those technologies: • Content ID: to have more flexibility down to the level of contents rather than the node level. • Decision based on: • IP address. • sometimes port# • Decision based on: • IP address. • Content ID. Content Server Content Server OpenFlow Router Using Content ID In Content Anycasting Regular

  11. 7-How to Combine Technologies: • Content anycasting does its rule by using: • OpenFlow for the process of choosing the destination, along with the aid of the content server. • A new procedure for requesting content is introduced to enable the clients to get the contents. Threshold reached Redirection Req. AnycastManager Content Server Content ID = X, in URL Redirection To: Au Cont id=X Su Get Content ID form URL To: Su Cont id=X Client A OpenFlow Router Client B Au Bu 11

  12. 7-How to Combine Technologies: • The new procedure for getting the content: • Phase 1: getting the content ID. (e.g.: from the URL). • Phase2: using the content ID in Probe protocol. • Phase 3: getting file via TCP. OpenFlow router New Client Current Client Destination: serverIP :START Phase 2 Destination: CurrentClientIP :START START/ACK With CurrentClientIP in the probe header ACK / ACK Destination: CurrentClientIP Phase 3 TCP Session Fig 1: Procedure for getting content (Hand shake of the Probe Protocol)

  13. 7-How to Combine Technologies: • Headers of the Probe protocol Fig1: UDP Header Fig2: Probe Protocol Header

  14. 8- Applications: • Characterized by large number of users, and long time sessions. • Aiding P2P network: • e.g.: live video of a sport show. • Popular: many users. • Long time session. • Content Anycast can: • Reduce user start-up time. • Reduce load on server or management entity. • Popular Large File Distribution: • Popular: many users. • Large file: long session. • Content Anycast can: • reduce the load on server.

  15. 8-1: App1: Popular Large File Distribution: • Example of use. Fig 1: installing redirections Fig 2: requesting content; phase2 Fig 3: requesting content; phase3

  16. 9-App1: Popular Large File Distribution:Evaluation: • Using simple simulator, built using Java. • Simulates a network with 5 areas (5 networks); • Content Anycast: use only one server. • Regular Anycast: 5 replica servers each in one network. • Measure the server load : number of connections the server serves. • Shows that : • Regular Client server: single server load is 100%(one server for all) • Regular anycast: each server out of 5 load is 20%. • Content Anycast : single server load is 50%,33%, 25% and 20% respectively for case of client can serve 1, 2, 3, 4 other clients.

  17. 8-1: App1: Popular Large File Distribution: Evaluation: • Content Anycast can achieve same load as regular anycast but using only one server instead of 5.

  18. 8-2: App2: P2P construction: • Regular P2P network. • To join the network the client must follow steps: • locate the peer to contact, and arrange with management entity. • Contact that peer to get content. • This is done by asking the management entity (e.g. tracker) about which peer to contact to and receive its reply. Fig 1: Steps for Getting Content in regular P2P

  19. 8-2: App2: P2P construction: • Using Content Anycast in P2P network. • To join the network the client must follow steps: • locate the peer to contact, and Contact that peer to get content. • Reportandarrangewith the management entity. • This is done by using preinstalled redirection on the network. Fig 1: Steps for Getting Content in Content Anycast P2P

  20. 8-2: App2: P2P construction: • Example of use. Fig 1: installing redirections Fig 2: requesting content; phase2 Fig 3: requesting content; phase3

  21. 8-2: App2: P2P construction: Evaluation: • To evaluate start-up time: • Count the number of hops that the client request travels across the network + hops reply travels. • Content Anycast, average hops = 5. • Regular P2P, average hops = 14. • Content Anycast has a lower hop count due to using pre-installed redirections that lead request to peer in same network.

  22. 8-2: App2: P2P construction: Evaluation: Server load limit • To evaluate serve/management entity load. • Generate flash crowds periodically every 100 cycle. • Count the number of peer quivery requests received by the server/ management entity. • Content Anycast has a lower load due to using pre-installed redirections that lead request to peer in same network rather than the server.

  23. 9- Conclusion: • New mechanism for requesting content is designed to enable content anycasting. • Using the content id in the process of getting the content. • A Probe protocol is designed (modification to UDP) to be used. • Simulation shows that Content anycast can • reduce load to match reduction of the regular anycast (under some conditions) using only one server. • On simulation scenario: 80% reduction in number of servers. • construct P2P network that has shorter start-up time and less load on the management entity/ server. • On simulation scenario: 74% reduction in number of hops needed to get contents.

  24. Study Plan: • Goals: • Propose protocols and mechanisms to be implemented to Future Internet to enable inter and intra network management of flows. • Use them to create a smarter and self-organized network.

  25. 10- Q&A: • Thank you for listening.

More Related