1 / 12

The Future Internet as a Model for Future Public Systems

The Future Internet as a Model for Future Public Systems. Jon Crowcroft, Jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jac22. Future Internet Research. Network research Resilience, scale, flexibility Content distribution Internet of things All optical core, all wireless access

draco
Download Presentation

The Future Internet as a Model for Future Public Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Future Internet as a Model for Future Public Systems Jon Crowcroft, Jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jac22

  2. Future Internet Research • Network research • Resilience, scale, flexibility • Content distribution • Internet of things • All optical core, all wireless access • Etc etc etc • Yada yada yada • Blah blah blah…

  3. Future Internet Research • Use as model for other publc services • Past Internet delivered • Decentralisation • Federation • Adaptation • Evolution • How?

  4. Past Internet • Decentralised, Hierarchical Routing • Route around trouble • Pool resources • Distributed Resource Management • Congestion control in end • Pool resources • Federation • Policy route admits many business models • Pool resources • Layered Abstraction • Can evolve independently • Hence Web, VOIP, IPTV, OSNs, etc

  5. Past Internet uses • Advertisement/discovery • Add a host, router net is trivial • Rendezvous • No pre-arrangement necessary • Hierarchy • Scale arbitrarily • Names, addresses, routes, capacity etc

  6. Architecture Design Rules • End-to-end model • Postel Principle • Amdahl/Cray/Moore’s laws etc • Consumer electronics scale

  7. Three examples of applying model • Transportation • Use end2end model • Energy • Use federation model • Government • Use extreme decentralization model

  8. Transportation • The use of end2end principle:- • Separate routing and “transport” • Person as packet, switched to destination • Adapt routes in situ, en route • Congestion control => congestion exposure • London was a good start :-)

  9. Energy • Many many many providers • Federate • Build subtle meta-business rule system • == BGP • Adapt (a la routing and traffic engineering) • Use higher level information • about demand • Co-optimise Energy with other things • E.g. 1. Transport & 2. Interweb • We have £6M EPSRC project looking at 2.

  10. Government • Decentralize = subsidiarity • IP name/address/content governance • Hierarchy • Hides complexity • May be inflexible to multi-dimensional • Social, economic, safety etc • So my weakest example • Typical geek trying to understand politics • getting reductionist

  11. Conclusions • The lessons of the Internet are deep • We can apply them in other domains • Interesting synergies may emerge • Might be a good FISB UK topic • UK scale is excellent for ideas • Much better than top down • Database state unnecessary • Avoid embarrassing errors like NPfIT

  12. Questions

More Related