1 / 1

S. Charles, Medical Sciences, KU School of Medicine–Wichita

Summary of Results: Fifty percent of the SPs who completed the certification program increased their inter-rater reliability from the previous year. Seventy percent of those SPs who did not receive training experienced a decrease in their inter-rater reliability decrease.

omana
Download Presentation

S. Charles, Medical Sciences, KU School of Medicine–Wichita

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Summary of Results: • Fifty percent of the SPs who completed the certification program increased their inter-rater reliability from the previous year. • Seventy percent of those SPs who did not receive training experienced a decrease in their inter-rater reliability decrease. • For the overall MS III assessment, the inter-rater reliability of the SPs increased by 87% in the second year. • Conclusions: • The inter-rater reliability increased significantly following the implementation oft the SP certification program. • The creation of the SP certification program enhanced the inter-observer reliability and validity of the SP/student encounter. • Future studies will include a self analysis of SP responses to student encounters. • Background: • A trained standardized patient (SP) provides feedback to students enhancing the students’ communication skills. • Inter-observer reliability and validity among SPs in these encounters is key to standardizing feedback. • Objective: • Develop an intervention to increase inter-rater reliability. • Methodology: • During the MS III Clinical Skills Assessment, SPs completed checklists of requirements and provided feedback during end-of-year assessments. • The director of the CACL and trained faculty observers evaluated the feedback from the SPs and completed the same requirements checklist of the students. • We determined inter-rater reliability and validity as being able to compare these checklists within a single standard deviation from the SPs’ original interaction. • Additional inter-rater reliability was validated by industrial psychologists with psychometric training and expertise. • This study tracked the reliability and validity among SPs in MS III end-of-year assessments over a two year period. • Methodology (Cont.): • After determining inter-observer reliability could be improved, a 90-hour certification program was developed: • Educational theory, communication skills and feedback/evaluation methods coursework (30 hours) • Physical examination skills coursework (30 hours) • Film review and evaluation (15 hours) • Mentorship for SPs with less seniority (15 hours) • Each SP was filmed pre- and post-training. • One group of SPs was not trained and 35 SPs were trained. • Analysis of inter-observer reliability was completed by the director of the CACL, trained faculty observers, and industrial psychologists. What is the impact of a certificate program for Standardized Patients (SPs) on the end-of-year assessments? S. Charles, Medical Sciences, KU School of Medicine–Wichita D. Schocken, Center for Advanced Clinical Learning (CACL), USF College of Medicine wichita.kumc.edu

More Related