1 / 19

Staff Development Entitlement Subcommittee Final Report FY11

Staff Development Entitlement Subcommittee Final Report FY11. Mobile County Public School System. Mission.

oleg-mason
Download Presentation

Staff Development Entitlement Subcommittee Final Report FY11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Staff Development Entitlement SubcommitteeFinal Report FY11 Mobile County Public School System

  2. Mission • The mission of the Department of Staff Development is to build district capacity to effectively and efficiently improve student learning through a broad range of systemic, intentional, on-going professional learning opportunities for MCPSS employees.

  3. Goals for 2010-11 • Increase the number of MCPSS schools to make AYP from 62 to 68 (10%). (66 with Regional School; increase of 6%) • Increase the number of professional development opportunities from 5,147 to 5,662 (+10%). (4,983; decrease of 3%; 164 sessions) • Increase the percentage of district CAS teachers who have participated in high-quality staff development from 93.2% (3,115 teachers) to 95%. (insert Accountability Survey Percentage)

  4. PLU #6 “Technology” for Principals PLU #6 “Technology” for Assistant Principals PLU #7 “Management of the Learning Organization” for Teachers with Administrative Certification Educate Alabama Updates AdvancED Training for Steering Committee ARRA Leadership Training

  5. ARRA Leadership Training (cont.) • CLAS Leadership Institute (124 participated; 13% increase over 2009-10) • New Principal Mentor Program (5 first year principals and their mentors logged a minimum of 70 hours each last year in collaborative activities) • New Principal Mentor Training (2 new secondary principal mentors)

  6. PLU #6 “Technology” for Principals PLU #6 “Technology” for Assistant Principals PLU #7 “Management of the Learning Organization” for Teachers with Administrative Certification New Principal Mentor Training CLAS New Principal Institute Title II Leadership Training

  7. Title II Leadership Training (cont.) • CLAS Leadership Institute (124 participated; 13% increase over 2009-10) • New Principal Mentor Program (5 first year principals and their mentors logged a minimum of 70 hours each last year in collaborative activities) • CLAS New Principal Institute (___ participated) • COMP Train-the-Trainer Seminar (___new COMP trainers)

  8. PLU # 6 Principals’ Evaluation These sessions increased my skill in planning, implementing, and evaluating the effective integration of current technologies and electronic tools in teaching, management, and communication.– 100% strongly agree/agree These learning experiences increased my confidence and skill in modeling the use of technology for personal and professional productivity. – 100% strongly agree/agree These learning experiences increased my understanding and application of system, state, and federal policies governing technology use in schools.– 100% strongly agree/agree

  9. PD 360: On-line PD Library

  10. PD 360 contract College Board – SpringBoard consultants for Initial training and Cognitive Coaching follow-up for Rain HS and Pillans MS New Teacher Network Substitutes Stipends Training Materials Travel ARRA Instructional PD

  11. PD 360 contract Substitutes Stipends Training Materials Travel, mostly local In-school support Title II Instructional PD

  12. Number of PD Opportunities

  13. NCLB Accountability Survey

  14. 52 schools Varied goals and activities based on need School-based PD Grants

  15. How effective was your grant project in accomplishing the identified adult learning goals and measurable objectives? 67.7% Effective, Very Effective; 29% Completely Awesome! Will your faculty continue PD and implementation on this grant topic into the 2011-12 school year? 100% Yes School-based PD GrantEvaluation

  16. ARRA Budget Allocated - $334,807.73 Expended - $ Balance - $

  17. Title II Budget Allocated - $ 100,000 Expended - $ Balance - $

  18. School-based PD Grant BudgetTitle II Carryover Allocated - $251,454 Expended - $ Balance - $

  19. Reflections on 2010-11 • Strengths • Growth in PD 360 use, especially in reflection questions • Opportunities for Improvement • Continue training on technology in leadership sessions in addition to PLU #1 (eCIP and AdvancED)

More Related