1 / 31

ESPAC-3(v2)

ESPAC-3(v2) A multicentre, international, open label, randomised controlled phase III trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) versus gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer

nyla
Download Presentation

ESPAC-3(v2)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESPAC-3(v2) A multicentre, international, open label, randomised controlled phase III trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) versus gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer CR-UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit

  2. Background ESPAC-1 compared chemotherapy [5FU/FA with chemoradiation Using a 2x2 factorial design • Observation Chemotherapy (CT) • Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) CRT CT

  3. ESPAC-1 Lancet, 2001: No benefit for Chemoradiation – Potential benefit for Chemotherapy Lancet, 2001;358(9293):1576-85

  4. JNCI 2008; 100: 1670-1

  5. ESPAC-3(v1) Trial Design Patients with ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing ‘curative’ resection Target N=990 RANDOMISE 5FU/ FA 5-FU 425mg/m2 & FA 20mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days for 6 cycles Target N=330 GEMCITABINE 1000mg/m2 once a week for 3 of 4 weeks for 6 cycles Target N=330 OBSERVATION Target N=330 330 per group to detect 10% difference in 2y survival rate ( = 5%, 1-b = 80%) Trial opened July 2000

  6. Eligibility Complete macroscopic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (WHO Classification) R0 or R1 resection No: ascites, liver or peritoneal metastasis, or any other distant abdominal or extra-abdominal organ spread No previous or concurrent malignancy diagnoses WHO performance status < 2 Life-expectancy of more than 3 months Fully informed written consent

  7. ESPAC-1 ESPAC-1 NEJM 2004: No benefit for Chemoradiation confirmed Survival rates 2-year 5-year No CRT: 41.4% 19.6% CRT: 28.5% 10.0% HR=1.28 (0.99, 1.66), p=0.053 NEJM 2004; 350:1200-10

  8. ESPAC-1 ESPAC-1 NEJM 2004: Benefit for Chemotherapy confirmed Survival rates 2-year 5-year No CT: 30.0% 8.4% CT: 39.7% 21.1% HR=0.71 (0.55, 0.92), p=0.009 NEJM 2004; 350:1200-10

  9. Impact • OBSERVATION arm closed on DMC advice June 2003 (n=61) • Target recruitment updated to detect 10% difference in survival at 2-years with 90% power, DMC July 2005 • Updated Target: 515 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients (275 events) per chemotherapy group

  10. ESPAC-3(v2) Trial Design Patients with ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing ‘curative’ resection Target N=1030* RANDOMISE 5FU/ FA Target N=515 Actual=551 GEMCITABINE Target N=515 Actual N=537 3-monthly follow-up to death 515 per group to detect 10% difference in 2y survival rate ( = 5%, 1-b = 90%) *Actual N=1088

  11. In the meantime! CONK01 Adjuvant Trial: Gemcitabine vsObservation ESPAC Adjuvant Trials: 5FU/FA vsObservation Overall survival Disease free survival HR= 0.68 (0.50, 0.92) p = 0.001 Log rank p < 0.001 N = 354 Survival rates 2-year 5-year Obs: 37% 14% 5FU/FA: 49% 24% Cumulative survival % Cumulative survival % Gemcitabine N = 458 Observation Months No. at risk Gemcitabine Observation Br J Cancer 2009; 100 :246-50 Oettle et al JAMA, 2007 17;297:267-77

  12. July 2000 - Jan 2007

  13. Patient Demographics 5FU/FA GEM TOTAL n=551 n=537 n=1088 *Age (years) 63 (34-85)63 (31-81) 63 (31-85) Sex Male 301 (55%)297 (55%) 598 (55%) Female 250 (45%)240 (45%) 490 (45%) Baseline PS † 0 200 (36%)167 (31%) 367 (34%) 1 286 (52%)303 (57%) 589 (54%) 2 64 (12%)64 (12%) 128 (12%) Smoking † Never 207 (43%)189 (40%) 396 (41%) Past 192 (39%)207 (44%) 399 (42%) Present 87 (18%)78 (16%) 165 (17%) *Surgery to Rand (days) 45 (4-114)45 (5-98) 45 (4-114) * Median (Range) † Significant prognostic variable

  14. Tumour Pathology 5FU/FA GEM TOTAL n=551 n=537 n=1088 Stratification factor: R Status † R0 356 (65%)348 (65%) 704 (65%) R1 195 (35%)189 (35%) 384 (35%) *Max Tumour Size (mm) † 30 (2-350)30 (2-105) 30 (2-350) Grade † Well 81 (15%)66 (13%) 147 (14%) Mod 327 (60%)336 (63%) 663 (62%) Poor 135 (25%)125 (24%) 260 (24%) Undiff2 (0%)2 (0%) 4 (0%) Nodes † Neg161 (29%) 144 (27%) 305 (28%) Pos 387 (71%)391 (73%) 778 (72%) * Median (Range) † Significant prognostic variable

  15. On-Study Data 5FU/FA GEM TOTAL n=551 n=537 n=1088 Diabetic No 388 (75%)375 (75%)763 (75%) Non-insulin dep54 (11%)51 (10%)105 (10%) Insulin dep72 (14%) 73 (15%)145 (14%) Surgery Whipples286 (56%) 295 (59%)581 (58%) Pylorus Pres 158 (31%) 147 (30%)305 (30%) Total Panc27 (5%)14 (3%) 41 (4%) Distal Panc40 (8%)39 (8%) 79 (8%) Local Invasion †No 297 (58%) 284 (57%)581 (58%) Yes 213 (42%) 215 (43%)428 (42%) Post-op Comps No 396 (78%) 364 (74%)760 (76%) Yes 112 (22%) 130 (26%)242 (24%)

  16. χ2LR = 31.8, p<0.001 χ2LR = 24.2, p<0.001 χ2LR = 52.7, p<0.001 χ2LR = 16.3, p<0.001

  17. Follow-Up

  18. 5-FU 425mg/m2 d1-d5 @28d for 6 cycles Total protocol 5FU=2,125mg/m2 per cycle, overall=12,750mg/m2 60 (11%) of 551 patients received NO 5FU/FA 301 (55%) of 551 patients received 6 cycles 5FU/FA Median total 5FU dose: 10,125mg/m2 (Range: 425-17,950) Median protocol 5FU dose: 79% (Range: 3-141%) GEMCITABINE 1000mg/m2 d1 @wk for 3/4 wks for 6 cycles Total protocol GEM=3,000mg/m2 per cycle, overall=1,8000mg/m2 53 (10%) of 537 patients received NO GEMCITABINE 323 (60%) of 537 patients received 6 cycles GEMCITABINE Median total GEM dose: 16,000mg/m2 (Range: 1,000-21,974) Median protocol GEM dose: 89% (Range: 6-122%) Treatment Received

  19. Reported Toxicity Number of patients with at least one NCI CTC v2. grade 3/4 event p=0.013 p=0.94 p=0.0034* p=0.37 p=0.34 p<0.001* p=1.0 p=0.16 p<0.001* p=0.027 * Exploratory analysis: sig level p<0.005 using Bonferroni adjustment

  20. Serious Adverse Events 612 patients reported 892 SAE 304 5FU/FA patients reported 458 SAE 308 GEM patients reported 434 SAE 117 (11%) patients reported 149 Treatment Related SAE 77 (14%)* 5FU/FA patients reported 97 SAE 40 (7.5%)* GEM patients reported 52 SAE *Exploratory analysis: Fishers Exact test p<0.001

  21. Overall Survival Median S(t)= 23.2 months (95%CI:21.7, 24.9)

  22. Survival by Treatment Median S(t)= 23.0 months (95%CI:21.1, 25.0) Median S(t)= 23.6 months (95%CI:21.4, 26.4) c2LR=0.74, p=0.39, HRGEM VS 5FU/FA=0.94 (95%CI: 0.81, 1.08)

  23. Treatment Effect by R-Status

  24. Adjusted Treatment Effect Treatment effect adjusted by Stratification Factors at randomisation: R-Status and Country Frailty Model: Country, p=0.61 (random effect) R-Status, p<0.001 (fixed effect) Treatment, p=0.36, HR=0.94 (9%%CI: 0.81, 1.08)

  25. PFS by Treatment Median PFS(t)= 14.1months (95%CI:12.5, 15.3) Median PFS(t)= 14.3months (95%CI:13.5, 15.7) c2LR=0.59, p=0.44, HRGEM VS 5FU/FA=0.95 (95%CI: 0.83, 1.09)

  26. Conclusions No difference in survival between adjuvant gemcitabine and 5-FU/FA in patients with resected pancreatic cancer The safety profile of gemcitabine was better than that of 5-FU/FA Data reinforce the perfect design of the ESPAC-4 trial comparing gemcitabine with the combination of gemcitabine with capecitabine

  27. Acknowledgements Cancer Research-UK Fonds de Recherche de la Société Nationale Française de Gastroentérologie Ministero Università e Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Rome; Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro Health and Medical Research Council of Australia National Cancer Institute of Canada

  28. Leading ESPAC Contributors JP Neoptolemos, P Ghaneh, DD Stocken, D Smith, D Cunningham, D Goldstein, R Padbury, M Moore, S Gallinger, C Mariette, M Wente, M Lerch, H Friess, J Izbicki, C Dervenis, A Olah, G Butturini, R Doi, P Lind, J Valle, C Rawcliffe, C McKay, R Carter, D Palmer, J Buckels, C Bassi and M Büchler

  29. UK Contributors F Adab, DJ Adamson, A Anthoney, C Archer, C Askill, CA Baughan, S Bramhall, J Bridgewater, J Buckels, R Carter, F Campbell, R Charnley, I Chau, MJ Churn, PI Clark, P Corrie, F Coxon, T Crosby, D Cunningham, F Daniel, BR Davidson, J Dent, M Eatock, TRJ Evans, S Falk, D Ferry, D Furniss, D Fyfe, P Ghaneh, S Gollins, P Harper, MN Hartley, AB Hassan, R Hawkins, D Haylock, M Highley, M Hill, CW Imrie, T Iveson, A Jamil, C Johnson, P Johnson, A Kingsnorth, R Kulkarni, JA Ledermann, PC Leonard, F Lofts, S Madhusudan, U Mallick, A Maraveyas, E Marshall, TS Maughan, K Mcadam, CJ McKay, A Mcdonald, T Meyer, M Middleton, G Middleton, S Mukherjee, P Mulvenna, M Napier, BT Orr, R Osborne, MJ Ostrowski, D Palmer, S Pascoe, T Plunkett, D Propper, P Ross, M Seymour, A Shaukat, D Smith, S Sothi, D Spooner, W Steward, DD Stocken, R Sutton, S Tahir, J Thompson, AR Todd, E Toy, G Ullenhag, J Valle, C Verbeke, N Wadd, J Wadsley, L Wall, N Warner, H Wasan, J Waters and C Wilson ISDMC – R A’Hern, P Clark and RCG Russell

  30. European Contributors Czech Republic: M Ryska and Dr R Strnad Finland: I Nordback, T Salminen and J Sand France: A Champault, PR Chiche, B Derousseaux, C Dilin, B Dousset, A Elhadad, A Fingerhut, Y Flamant, F Lacaine, C Mariette, O Oberlin, V Pannegeon, JM Regimbeau, Di Rio, B Sastre and MS Sbai-Idriasy Germany: WE Aulitzky, MW Buchler, A Chromik, I Esposito, A Finke, H Friess, A Frilling, P Herzog, D K Hossfeld, JR Izbicki, R Klapdor, G Leder, M Lerch, K Link, F Lordick, J Mayerle, B Rau, P Schafhausen, K Schoppmeyer, J Stohlmacher, M Wente and PD Werner Greece: C Dervernis and E Chatzitheoklitos Hungary: D Kelemen, A Olah and A Pap Italy: C Bassi, G Butturini, P Pederzoli and S Pedrazzoli Poland: W Polkowski Serbia: M Milicevic and D Radenkovic Sweden: A Berglund, N Bjorkman, C Bratthall, B Glimelius, MG Johansson, BM Karlsson, P Lind, P Naredi, P Nygren, J Permert LB Rasmussen and A Thune Switzerland: J Kleeff and M Wagner

  31. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan Contributors Canada: T Alcindor, HJ Au, G Batist, E Bergeron, S Berry, G Bjarnason, J Blondal, C Butts, E Chen, S Cheng, B Colwell, C Cripps, P Czaykowski, B Dingle, M Doreen, R Feld, A Fields, C Fitzgerald, S Gallinger, A Haq, D Hedley, D Jonker, P Kavan, I Kerr, K King, J Knox, Y Ko, S Koski, M Krahn, M Krzyzanowska, W Lofters, A Maksymiuk, J Maroun, M Moore, C O'Callaghan, A Oza, S Rao, D Rayson, A Saltman, B Samson, M Sanatani, A Scarfe, L Siu, N Spry, A Tomiak, K Virik , B Weinerman, M Wexler, R Wong and L Wood Australia: E Abdi, S Ackland, M Brown, WI Burns, I Byard, P Cooray, R Eek, V Ganju, D Goldstein, D Grimes, A Haydon, C Karapetis, P Kho, F Kirstan, B Koczwara, D Kotasek, D Leong, L Lipton, G Marx, SA Mclachlan, E Moylan, IN Olver, R Padbury, F Parnis N Paulakis, D Pook, T Price, J Shannon , J Shapiro, B Stein, N Tebbutt, C Underhill, G Van Hazel, D Wyld, D Yip and R Young New Zealand: P Bagshaw, D Gibbs, S Connor, M Jeffrey and B Robinson Japan: T Asano, R Doi, A Funakoshi, A Funakoshi, T Hatori, S Nakamori, M Sunamura, K Takasaki and K Yamaguchi

More Related