radiatively inefficient accretion flows
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 151 Views
  • Uploaded on

Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows. Roman Shcherbakov, 28 November, 2007. Radiative efficiency. Gas accretes onto the source, but does not radiate due to (1) low density (2) low electron temperature (3) large optical depth. efficiency

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows' - nuwa


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
radiatively inefficient accretion flows

Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows

Roman Shcherbakov,

28 November, 2007

radiative efficiency
Radiative efficiency

Gas accretes onto the source, but

does not radiate due to

(1) low density

(2) low electron temperature (3) large optical depth

efficiency

(function of gas density)

Innermost Stable Circular Orbit (ISCO)

Radiatively Inefficient

Accretion Flows (RIAFs)

Gas radiates away a lot of its grav. energy

0.06-0.42 efficiency (function of BH spin)

ADAF

possible riaf configurations
The only realistic pattern:

every astrophysical system has

large angular momentum

for a typical AGN

for Sgr A*

Possible RIAF configurations

Spherical (Bondi) accretion

+ outflows

– dimensionless angular momentum

spherical accretion bondi 1952
radius of influence of BH, 1pc for 10^8MSun

for

Spherical accretion (Bondi, 1952)
  • u=cS at sonic radius rS, subsonic flow at r>rS, supersonic flow at r>rS
  • Such a solution is
  • Smooth
  • Has maximum accretion rate

Efficiency

Physical

slide5
Thick disk accretion

Adiabatic Inflow-Outflow Solution

(Blandford, Begelman 1999)

Hawley,

Balbus 2002

Advection-Dominated Accretion Flow

(Narayan, Yi 1995)

Not only AGNs, but also Gamma Ray Bursts

and protoplanetary disks

adaf luminosity
ADAF luminosity

Large optical

depth ADAF

(ULX sources)

Narayan, Mahadevan, Quataert astro-ph/9803141

adaf adios cdaf
ADAF/ADIOS/CDAF

Advection-Dominated Accretion Flow (Narayan, Yi 1995)

  • Needed to fit the observations
  • Too low electron temperature Te<
  • Too Low gas density near the black hole
  • Too small magnetic field in that region
  • ADAF is convectively unstable and does not include diffusion

Adiabatic Inflow-Outflow Solution (Blandford, Begelman 1999)

ADAF with outflows (Yuan 2001)

Phenomenological inclusion of outflows

“Thebinding energy of a gram of gas at a fewgravitational radii drives off

100 kg of gas from gravitational radii” – Blandford

Convection-Dominated Accretion Flows (Narayan, Igumenshchev, & Abramowicz 2000)

Accounts for convective instability of ADAF,

but full 3-D analysis is not doable analytically

jet adaf model for sgr a
Jet-ADAF model for Sgr A*

Yuan,Markoff, Falcke 2002

spectral states
Spectral states

Soft –

UV, IR

Hard –

X-Rays

Narayan, Mahadevan, Quataert astro-ph/9803141

http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~amueller/lexdt_a02.html

slide11
Hawley, Balbus, “The Dynamical Structure of

Nonradiative Black Hole Accretion Flows” 2002, ApJ, 573, 738

slide12
Hawley, Balbus, “The Dynamical Structure of

Nonradiative Black Hole Accretion Flows” 2002, ApJ, 573, 738

results of numerical simulations
Results of Numerical Simulations

Density

Entropy

Hawley, Balbus & Stone, 2001 ApJ, 554, L49

time variability
Time variability

Temperature

At r=4rg

Density

conclusions
Conclusions
  • Studies are controversial
  • Realistic accretion pattern is likely to be very complicated
  • Numerical simulations are preferable to analytical methods
  • Most effects are not yet included, small resolution
  • MHD instead of plasma calculations
  • Developed in the last 30 years, will we get the ultimate
  • answer within the next 30 years?
ad