html5
1 / 34

Status of the project Review of TSC report Review of Sempere Torres report Final workshop

C ritical A ssessment of available R adar P recipitation E stimation techniques and D evelopment of I nnovative approaches for E nvironmental M anagement. Status of the project Review of TSC report Review of Sempere Torres report Final workshop

nubia
Download Presentation

Status of the project Review of TSC report Review of Sempere Torres report Final workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches for Environmental Management

  2. Status of the project • Review of TSC report • Review of Sempere Torres report • Final workshop • Discussion about a possible 6th FP follow-on action • Second Year Report • e-TIP

  3. Review of external expert reports • Technical Steering commettee • Daniel Sempere Torres

  4. Possible follow-on project • Result from the ACTIF meeting • RainClouds • Depending on the call, there is the possibility to present a STREP (new name for RTD project like CARPE DIEM)

  5. Final workshop • At the Colchester meeting was agreed to try to put the final workshop within the ERAD 2004 conference (Sept. 6-10 2004) • As a second possibility we can insert the final workshop with the EGS Plinius – topical conference on Mediterranean storms. This conference aims to collect in the same place different communities (meteorologists, hydrologists, geologists) to discuss about risk management. Possible dates mid-oct 2004 (17-24). • It could be possible that this conference will be organized on a ship within a one week trip (over the Mediterranean Sea). • There is a possibility to organize together with the final workshop a “radar school” where the different CARPE DIEM area could present their results (this is also encouraged by the TSC) • As a third possibility the final workshop could by organized in Bologna (again there is the possibility to co-organized a radar school), possible period November. • No other idea.

  6. 2nd Annual Report • To be send to the Commission within two months of the end of the 2nd year. • Proposed time schedule • each area coordinator should send a short report (1-2 pages), to be inserted in the executive summary, before the end of January. • each partner should send the text section and the “cost statement” to the coordinator before the end of January. • I will collect all contributions and send a draft of the report by the 10th feb. • Time for comments/modifications up to 20th Feb. • Send report to the Commission

  7. The Periodic Report provides information on the progress made in the project. • SECTION 1, corresponding to the Management Report. • SECTION 2 contains an executive summary describing the main results achieved in the project during the reporting project. • SECTION 3 is dedicated to the progress made, organised per work package. The individual contributions of each partner should be described. This will give an opportunity to closely follow the progress made in each work package and to inform all the partners of the overall progress of the project. • One important aim of FP5 is to put more attention to the exploitation of the results. Therefore, the requirement to prepare annually a draft T.I.P (SECTION 4) will help the project consortium to be oriented to the dissemination and exploitation of the results since the beginning of the project.

  8. SECTION 4 eTIP

  9. SECTION TWOWhat is the TIP?

  10. What is the TIP? For the Commission:- • A compulsory deliverable • Specified in the model contract • The means by which the contractor documents the exploitation efforts that they are obliged to undertake • Agreed by all Programmes after wide consultation

  11. What is the TIP? For the researcher:- • A tool to help plan and implement exploitation • A way to demonstrate the benefits of the research • A means to gain publication of results • A means to keep commercial plans confidential

  12. What is the TIP? Format:- • Common to all Programmes • Collects all exploitation information in one submission • Electronic

  13. What is the TIP? • § 17.1 of Model Contract • The technological implementation plan shall include • a summary of the project and • a forecast of the intentions of the contractors, as well as a description of their achievements regarding the use of the knowledge.

  14. How to submit a TIP? The eTIP is found at www.cordis.lu/etip

  15. How to submit a TIP?

  16. How to submit a TIP?

  17. How to submit a TIP? STEP 1The Project Coordinator registers themselves, all the project partners, and the project details. STEP 2The partners or the coordinator provide details of their individual exploitable results from the project. STEP 3The coordinator checks that everything has been completed and submits the eTIP.

  18. Step one: Coordinator registers

  19. INFORMATION Summary of project Description of results including categorisation into types A,B, or C Ownership of results COMPLETED BY Co-ordinator USE Update project data Promote results How to submit a TIP?

  20. INFORMATION Partner intentions IPR Protection measures Community added-value Differences to plan COMPLETED BY Coordinator OR Partners individually USE Internal by Commission services (not published) Aggregation at Commission level of partner information for reporting How to submit a TIP?

  21. INFORMATION Externally exploitable results Collaboration requests Offers of technology COMPLETED BY Partners (results owners) Mandatory if result is Type A USE CORDIS for publication IRC for promotion LIFT for financing IPR for protection How to submit a TIP?

  22. INFORMATION Assessment of EU impact COMPLETED BY Co-ordinator COMMENTED ON BY Commission Project Officer USE Justifies project Is commented on (confidentially) by Commission Project Officer How to submit a TIP?

  23. How to submit a TIP? eTIP Functions: • Can be completed and saved in sessions • Pre-populated with project data • Co-ordinator, partners and CPO have own access • Confidentiality of data assured • Data goes straight into a database • Performs all functions of former TIP form

  24. Project id : carpediem project password: carpediem

  25. progea dlr_cd smhi_cd fmi uessex ubarcelona isac nuid progea dlr_cd smhi_cd fmi uessex ubarcelona isac nuid Partner id password

More Related