1 / 12

Beamline Development and Facility Usage

Beamline Development and Facility Usage. BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES. Beamline Development. Two principal modes :. User groups would form and work with the facility to define the scientific mission and technical requirements for the beamline. Beamline Access Teams (BATs)

norm
Download Presentation

Beamline Development and Facility Usage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beamline Development and Facility Usage BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

  2. Beamline Development Two principal modes : User groups would form and work with the facility to define the scientific mission and technical requirements for the beamline Beamline Access Teams (BATs) Facility receives funding to design, construct, and operate beamlines. Beamline Development Teams (BDTs) User group receives funding to design, construct, and operate beamline.

  3. Modes of Access Year Facility BAT GU/CU 1 20% 50% 30% 2 20% 35% 45% 3 20% 0% 80%* * GU time to be no less than 50% General Users (GUs) Users apply for time on facility or non-facility beamlines. Proposals can be one time (one cycle) or two year (program). Provision also for rapid access on certain beamlines (reviewed after the fact). Contributing Users (CUs) Individuals or groups who carry out research at NSLSII Facility Beamlines and also enhance beamline capabilities and/or contribute to their operation. Possible BAT ramp up BAT Access – Facility run beamlines • Would ramp up to 80:20 division. • GU time no less than 50% in steady state. • BDT Access – User run beamlines • At least 25% of the time to GU program. • Commissioning comes out of BDT time.

  4. Beamline Access Teams Submit LOI (10 pages) EFAC Decision Feedback Project funded MIE funded Facility hires made Allocation of funds CDR Facility review Refined cost estimate. Long lead time procurement commences TDR Facility review Construction begins BRR As built design Facility review Commissioning begins

  5. Beamline Development Teams Submit PP (10 pages) EFAC Decision Feedback Selected Full Proposal Submitted Facility review Approval to seek funds Facility assigns Project Coordinator Documentation of funds and conceptual design. Allocation of beamline CDR Facility review Long lead time procurement TDR Facility review Construction begins BRR Facility review As built design Commissioning complete

  6. Tentative Process & Schedule 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Full proposal CDR TDR CDR TDR Construction Commiss- ioning LOI: Select BATs Project BATs TDR LOI: Select BDTs Construction Commiss- ioning Initial BDTs Possible MIEs ? Possible MIEs BO Ring bldg 1st beam

  7. BAT Timeline • Call for LOI : March 2007 • Evaluate and select BATs: April 2008 • Staff hired for BAT: December 2008 • Develop and approve CDR: December 2009 • Develop and approve TDR: November 2010 • Long Lead Procurement: November 2010 • Begin Construction June 2011 • Begin commissioning: Jan 2013 • End commissioning: Dec 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Construction Commiss- ioning Select BATs + hire staff CDR TDR Construction Commiss- ioning Select PPs Full proposal Fund- ing CDR TDR BO Ring bldg 1st beam

  8. NSLS-II Beamlines • 15 five m straights for user undulators • Could potentially drive up to 30 beamlines by canting two undulators • 4 eight m straights for user undulators • Could potentially drive up to 12 beamlines by canting three undulators • 8 eight m straights for user damping wigglers • Could potentially drive up to 24 beamlines by canting three DWs • 20 BM ports for UV and soft X-rays • 10 BM ports for IR • 5 large aperture for far-IR • 5 regular aperture for mid/near-IR At least 57 beamlines Many more w/ maximum IDs per straight (plus possible multiple hutches per beamline)

  9. Usage of Facility NSLS-II NSLS Type IDs BMs Total IDs BMs Total A IR/UV/soft x-ray spectroscopy 1 11 12 3 7 10 B X-ray spectroscopy 6 3 9 0 9 9 C soft-matter/biophysics scattering 4 0 4 0 8 8 D hard matter/strongly correlated 9 1 10 3 5 8 E powder/single Xtal/high-P/optics 7 3 10 3 8 11 F Imaging/micro-probe 4 5 9 2 7 9 G Macromolecular crystallography 7 0 7 2 8 10 Totals 38 23 61 13 52 65 A strawman beamline distribution was constructed for one possible scenario for a mature facility: Note: This process took into account the expected demand, the existing community and the enhanced NSLS-II capabilities. In this scenario a few IDs and a few BMs remain open.

  10. Beamline Distribution: Insertion Devices Beamline Type IR/UV/soft spect X-ray Spect. Soft Matter Hard Matter Powder/Hi-P/optics Imaging/Microprobe PX Unavailable (machine) Open

  11. Beamline Distribution: Bending Magnets Beamline Type IR/UV/soft spect X-ray Spect. Soft Matter Hard Matter Powder/Hi-P/optics Imaging/Microprobe PX Unavailable (machine) Open BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

  12. Scientific Staff at NSLS-II • Roles and responsibilities of NSLS-II staff • User support and independent research • What fraction of time on independent research? • Connection to outside community • Joint Appointments • Role of Joint Photon Science Institute • NSLS-II Fellows • Very few (1-2) select individuals allocated resources and significant fraction of a beamline (beamtime through CU mode?). Expected to produce at very high level. Rigorously reviewed and competed for.

More Related