1 / 17

Fighting the Database & Winning: Cohort Data & Disaggregation Best Practices

Fighting the Database & Winning: Cohort Data & Disaggregation Best Practices. Christopher M. Johnson, PhD, Renton Technical College Michelle Andreas, EdD, Washington State Board of Community & Technical Colleges. Overview.

nona
Download Presentation

Fighting the Database & Winning: Cohort Data & Disaggregation Best Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fighting the Database & Winning: Cohort Data & Disaggregation Best Practices Christopher M. Johnson, PhD, Renton Technical College Michelle Andreas, EdD, Washington State Board of Community & Technical Colleges

  2. Overview • Discuss and survey issues with getting relevant data to analyze AtD strategies • Similarities and differences between US States • Show you our solution • Take it for a test drive • How we got there and why! • Share best practices Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  3. Quick Questions • How many of you are institutional researchers? • How many of you are satisfied with your current data system? • How many of you spend enough quality time doing useful analysis? • Instead, how many of you spend more time fighting the database than getting useful data out of it? Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  4. Issues with Your Data • Please mix with others from other states and other colleges as much as possible • With your neighbors, please brainstorm: • Personnel Issues • Technical Issues • Design Issues • Communication Issues Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  5. Detailed Issues – The Survey • Please fill out the detailed survey sheet • please add to web survey now or later • Feel free to talk about it with your neighbors, but please fill out according to your college and state specifically • Questions for everyone • Are there any strong disagreements from the survey – not an issue in your state or with your college? • Are there any agreements from the survey – big issues in your state or with your college? Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  6. The Positives in Washington • All 34 colleges use the same system • A lot of people know a lot of things • A puzzle, but someone often has a piece or two • The State Board puts out an easy-to-use database that answers a lot of questions • Which is good if both the college and the State have the same question • Not as good if your question is different • Unfortunately, tracking cohorts (in general) was not a State question • The Washington Student Achievement Model • Milestones between start and finish – Success tracking • Integrated into the State databases Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  7. So what did we do at Renton Tech? • The “Madrona” System • Features • Pre-designed Excel Pivot Tables and Charts • Deployed on a Campus Network • Currently, 25% of the campus is connected (includes all full time faculty, exec cabinet, admin) • Tech lite Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  8. Why Excel Pivot Tables? • Easy to set up – easy to filter • Easy to modify and adapt • Allow easy drill down or disaggregation • Everyone has Excel, so you don’t need to run around and install software • Most people use Excel • Pivot tables are intuitive • Try it out for yourself! • http://www.rtc.edu/AboutUs/ResearchDevelopment/Reports/ • Interactive Cohort Retention Report (in MS Excel 2007) – or ask Chris to copy the file to your computer) Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  9. Solving the Problem – Communication & Resources • Integrity Task Force – our strategy • Find out who knows what on and off campus • Look at every resource available • Data dictionary, any available diagrams • Map it out yourself • Establish good relationships with IT personnel on & off campus Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  10. Alignment with State Resources Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  11. Solving the Problem – Systematic • Extraction, Query, Report Phases • Develop Extraction & Report Phases First • Develop Summary Fields and Preserve Detail Fields (for drill down) • Use lookup tables to compensate for quirky data design (or lack of any design) • Get the data out to as many as possible as fast as possible (file server & network access) Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  12. Put out the reports • Run reports past the Data Team for feedback • Get the reports out - fast. Get feedback from campus. Take two Alka Seltzer and grow a thick skin • Hit back on the pot shots – If they say it’s wrong, make them prove it! • Establish an open door policy for anyone to challenge (with source documents) • Clean up the mistakes – design & run integrity tests • Use legacy system for real time reporting to give you time to develop • Get everything else out on the data warehouse Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  13. Provide Training & Support • Open door and quick response to faculty and staff • Negotiate important research questions from “fishing trips” • Refresh and Review • Once a quarter department meetings • Faculty data groups in addition to Data Team • Creates a feedback loop Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  14. Don’t do this alone! • Partner with other colleges in your state! • Partner with your college system’s governing body! • Give away your data system to your partners (Code sharing & joint development) • Don’t fall in love with your system, your technology, and/or your methods! • Someone else does some things better • You do some things better than someone else • Don’t design a big system with the goal to flip the switch when it’s done! (e.g., dashboards, SharePoint) • Instead, do Rapid Prototyping – Madrona is rapid prototyping, nothing more Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  15. Remember • No one cares one iota about your queries or your data warehouse or your cool technology • They only care about the reports and information • They can’t wait two or more years till your system is done! • By getting everyone involved ASAP, it’s everyone’s system and not your baby! Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  16. The Future & the Buzz in Washington • 34 colleges in Washington State have the same challenge (same legacy system) • Partnerships • Washington State Board of Community & Technical Colleges • 5 Colleges: Data Mart Project • Washington Association of Research Practitioners (WARP) • Changing from a code dictation, top down entity to a knowledge sharing body • Collaboration site being set up – knowledge sharing Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

  17. Thank you! • Any questions? • Detailed Technical Questions at Institutional Research and Effectiveness Focus Area Networking Session – 3:15 pm today Chris Johnson & Michelle Andreas

More Related