A tqm time quality money approach to managing projects in health care
Download
1 / 27

A TQM (Time-Quality-Money) Approach to Managing Projects in Health Care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 606 Views
  • Uploaded on

A TQM (Time-Quality-Money) Approach to Managing Projects in Health Care Andrew Booth, Reader in Evidence Based Information Practice, Director of Information Resources & Programme Director - FOLIO Programme (A.Booth@sheffield.ac.uk) For most people TQM = Total Quality Management

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A TQM (Time-Quality-Money) Approach to Managing Projects in Health Care' - niveditha


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
A tqm time quality money approach to managing projects in health care l.jpg

A TQM (Time-Quality-Money) Approach to Managing Projects in Health Care

Andrew Booth, Reader in Evidence Based Information Practice, Director of Information Resources & Programme Director - FOLIO Programme (A.Booth@sheffield.ac.uk)


For most people tqm total quality management l.jpg

For most people TQM = Total Quality Management Health Care

But when I learnt about Time Quality and Money everything I had experienced around project management fell into place…..



Planning the project time l.jpg
Planning the Project - Time Health Care

  • Allow for lead-in/start up time (e.g. recruitment/training)

  • Allow for contingencies

  • Plan for an earlier deadline and work back

  • Identify critical dependencies (minimum time for project is length of longest path)

  • Allow for evaluation



Planning the project quality l.jpg
Planning the Project - Quality Health Care

  • Clearly define quality within scope

  • Resist “scope creep”

  • Be explicit about constraints

  • Keep cross-checking expectations of team versus expectations of commissioners

  • Include both Process and Outcome Measures

  • Be SMART – Specific Measurable (objectively) Appropriate Realistic and Time-Bound


Planning quality tool specification of project outcomes l.jpg
Planning (Quality) Tool – Specification of Project Outcomes

E.g. from MLA

Project outcome meeting compulsory programme outcome

  • A group of three representatives of elderly people and their carers have been invited to sit on the management committee for the local library and are involved in the planning and strategic management of the service and its delivery. The group will meet quarterly for three years.

    Project Milestones

  • Recruit project Manager by Mar 09

  • Start on site October 08


Planning the project money l.jpg
Planning the Project - Money Outcomes

  • Fixed Costs (Infrastructure/Employed Staff etc)

  • Variable Costs (Consultancy/Activity-related etc)

  • Heat/Light/Space and Other Indirect Costs

  • Inflation/Pay Increases

  • VAT/Overheads

  • Consider not just resource but timing (e.g. Staff Training mainly Year One; Dissemination mainly Year Two)



Carrying out the project time l.jpg
Carrying out the Project - Time Outcomes

  • Build in both Internal and External Milestones

  • Put in a regular programme of meetings (you can always drop some if there is nothing to action/report)

  • Look for opportunities to “telescope” timescales

  • Be alive to opportunities to substitute action for unanticipated inaction (e.g. a postal strike, non-delivery of equipment etcetera)



Carrying out the project quality l.jpg
Carrying out the Project - Quality Outcomes

  • Build in lots of “checkpoints”

  • Share “work in progress” with commissioners

  • Be clear about your expectations from the commissioners (If we are to do……we need you to do…..)

  • Be honest and open about external constraints (but otherwise be like a Swan!)



Carrying out the project money l.jpg
Carrying out the Project - Money Outcomes

  • Build in monthly review of expenditure – include committed and actual

  • Look out for opportunities for Casual Labour, Secondments, Work Experience

  • Ensure that any underspends are redirected within the project

  • Be honest and open about any unanticipable changes to budget assumptions



Monitoring the project time quality and money l.jpg
Monitoring the Project – Time, Quality and Money Outcomes

  • Try to make review meetings synoptic (i.e. to consider Time, Quality and Money together)

  • Plan the Evaluation right from the beginning – data requirements and key informants

  • Make Progress Reports useful, not simply an added Task – what do I want to achieve, what support do I need

  • Use the Management Tools above to Identify Problems/Potential Problems

  • Use the Team as a Resource for Problem-Solving


Contingency planning what do you do if you hit time quality or money problems l.jpg

Contingency planning – What do you do if you hit Time, Quality or Money Problems?

Discussion


Contingency planning l.jpg
Contingency Planning Quality or Money Problems?

Time

  • Delegation

  • Overtime payments

  • Alternative methods to obtain outcome (e.g. telephone interviews instead of questionnaires)

  • Redeployment (from elsewhere)

  • Redistribution of roles/responsibilities (internal)

  • Rollover to a subsequent phase

  • Renegotiation with commissioner/stakeholders


Contingency planning20 l.jpg
Contingency Planning Quality or Money Problems?

Quality

  • Redeploy more experienced/qualified staff

  • Prototyping, modelling and piloting – same quality but proof of concept

  • Revise customer expectations

  • Sound documentation of deviation from project plan and likely implications


Contingency planning21 l.jpg
Contingency Planning Quality or Money Problems?

Money

  • Substitution – same job be done by someone who is paid less?

  • Subsidy – utilise hidden resources from elsewhere

  • Economy of scale – combine with a related project

  • Designate as a loss leader


Case study a realise projects l.jpg
Case Study A – REALISE Projects Quality or Money Problems?

Box 1 Summary of dimensions covered by REALISE checklist.

  • Involvement

  • Information needs analysis

  • Specification and purchase

  • Installation

  • Marketing and publicity

  • Project support and (personal) networking

  • Monitoring

  • Impact

  • Staff development

  • Consolidation

  • Evaluation methods


Case study b trent evaluation l.jpg
Case Study B – Trent Evaluation Quality or Money Problems?

Learning Needs (Handled through Action Learning Set)

  • Roles and Expectations

  • Information needs – (Questionnaires/Interviews)

  • Web design,

  • Obtaining funding

  • Evaluation,

  • Stakeholders and Marketing.


Why projects fail 1 l.jpg
Why Projects Fail - 1 Quality or Money Problems?

1.  Lack of commitment/understanding from commissioners

2. Misalignment with organisational objectives

3. Seduction by new technology

4. Failure to secure appropriate quantity/ level of staff resource

5. Incomplete project scope lacking clear definition of the project's benefits and outcomes


Why projects fail 2 l.jpg
Why Projects Fail - 2 Quality or Money Problems?

6. Lack of attention to project planning.

7. Mismatch (or dislocation) between costs and benefits (“bangs for your buck”)

8. Insufficient funding and incorrect budgeting to meet expectations.

9. Absence of appropriate project management techniques.

10. Lack of knowledge transfer of lessons learnt (“passing the baton”)


Tqm exemplified l.jpg
TQM Exemplified Quality or Money Problems?

i.e. Expectation of Quality

i.e. Money

i.e. Time

i.e. Mismatch of Quality vs Time and Money

i.e. Mismatch of Expectation vs Delivery ofQuality


References l.jpg
References Quality or Money Problems?

  • Booth, A (2000). Making a case. In: Booth, A & Walton G (Eds). Managing knowledge in health services. (pp. 112-121). London: Library Association.

  • Booth A. (2002) On a cautious adoption of innovative projects. Health Information & Libraries Journal 19(4):239-42.

  • Booth, A., Sutton, A. & Falzon, L. (2003) Working together: supporting projects through action learning. Health Information & Libraries Journal 20 (4 ) : 225-231.

  • Booth, A (2004) Managing projects. In Walton, G. & Booth, A. (Eds) Exploiting Knowledge in Health Services (pp. 115-124) London: Facet Publishing.

  • Falzon, L. & Booth, A. (2001) REALISE-ing their potential?: Implementing local library projects to support evidence-based health care. Health Information & Libraries Journal 18 (2): 65-74.