html5-img
1 / 22

Fish and Zooplankton Interactions

Fish and Zooplankton Interactions. Wetzel Chapter 16, pp. 460-468. Interactions between Fish and ZP . Predation Alteration of trophic structures Nutrient cycling. Feeding Relationships Among Fish. Feeding defined: acquisition of both energy and nutrients for growth and reproduction

nitesh
Download Presentation

Fish and Zooplankton Interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fish and Zooplankton Interactions Wetzel Chapter 16, pp. 460-468

  2. Interactions between Fish and ZP • Predation • Alteration of trophic structures • Nutrient cycling

  3. Feeding Relationships Among Fish • Feeding defined: acquisition of both energy and nutrients for growth and reproduction • Cost/Benefit Analysis: do the costs of food acquisition exceed energy gained from consumption – Maximize return per unit effort

  4. Prey Density and Diet Shifting • If prey are large and scarce, fish consume them one at a time • If prey are small and abundant, fish will filter water column – Mechanical Sieving • Obviously, these statements apply to fish capable of doing this and of the correct trophic status – i.e. adult walleye will not do this, but walleye larvae will

  5. Ontogenetic Diet Shift in Yellow Perch – Wu and Culver 1992 • As zooplankton occur less and less frequently, yellow perch young-of-year switch from zooplankton to benthic macroinvertebrates • This was found both in the lab and in nature • Function of the development of digestive organs

  6. Ontogenetic Diet Shift

  7. Ontogenetic Diet Shift

  8. Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey

  9. Distribution of Prey Species

  10. Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature

  11. Selectivity of Large Individuals

  12. Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature • Selectivity vs. Length

  13. Selectivity vs. Length

  14. Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature • Selectivity vs. Length • Selectivity vs. Eye Diameter

  15. Selectivity vs. Eye Diameter

  16. Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature • Selectivity vs. Length • Selectivity vs. Eye Diameter • Conclusion: Prey visibility and parts that are visible make a difference

  17. Predation of ZP by Fish • Predation by fish can shape communities of zooplankton • Relationship between size selection and foraging efficiency • Ex: Bluegill (p. 462 in Wetzel & refs therein) • Selects prey on basis of size • Growth rates increase with increasing food size • Increased efficiency (higher return with large prey) • Size selection based on search time and handling time • When there is low density of prey, more likely to take prey of any size • As prey density increased, search time decreased and small classes are consumed less frequently

  18. Predation of ZP by Fish • Another example of Size Selectivity • Crystal Lake, Connecticut (Brooks and Dodson, 1965) • No alewife – large zp • Alewife introduced – shift to smaller zp • But why were larger present in the first place and no coexistence of all sizes?

  19. Size Efficiency Hypothesis • When size-selective predation not occurring in lakes, small zooplankton not found to occur with larger zooplankton • The Hypothesis: • Planktonic herbivore zp compete for small food particles in the pelagic zone of a lake • Larger zp filter more efficiently and can take larger particles – this allows for reduced metabolic maintenance demands allowing for more devotion of energy to reproduction

  20. Size Efficiency Hypothesis (3) Therefore, larger forms come to dominate (4) However, if fish size-selective predation is intense, larger forms are selected to be eaten, allowing smaller forms to dominate (5) If predation pressure is moderate, large forms are reduced and this allows coexistence of forms • Some evidence for this – Threshold food concentrations • Amount of food to satisfy metabolic upkeep decreases with increasing body sizes • In Cladocerans, Gliwicz 1990; however, rotifers may not follow the same patterns

  21. Food Limitations in ZP • If food is limiting, body sizes and mass are reduced and reproduction is minimal • Interaction of food limitation and size selective feeding shapes the community • Which is more important depends on lake characters

  22. Conclusions • Fish and ZP interact through predation • How this actually shapes the communities is dependent of many different forces

More Related