1 / 52

Dust and vapour cloud the view

Richard Allan Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading, UK. Dust and vapour cloud the view. Thanks to Tony Slingo, Ruth Comer, Sean Milton, Malcolm Brooks, and the GERB International Science Team. Introduction. Climate and NWP models Model evaluation:

nita
Download Presentation

Dust and vapour cloud the view

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Richard Allan Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading, UK Dust and vapour cloud the view Thanks to Tony Slingo, Ruth Comer, Sean Milton, Malcolm Brooks, and the GERB International Science Team

  2. Introduction • Climate and NWP models • Model evaluation: • Top down/bottom up approach • Diagnosing variability and feedbacks • Nuts and bolts: model parametrizations and physical processes • fast feedbacks • Limitations of the observing systems

  3. Clouds and Climate Intro 3 • Clouds and climate Bony and Dufresne (2005)

  4. Objectives • Validation of new datasets (GERB/SEVIRI) • Timely Model Evaluation • Understanding of physical processes

  5. GERB July 2006 OLR Animation Model Sinergee project: www.nerc-essc.ac.uk/~rpa/GERB/gerb.html

  6. All-sky Clear-sky Mean model bias: 2006 Shortwave Longwave

  7. All-sky Clear-sky Mineral dust aerosol Cirrus outflow Marine stratocumulus Shortwave Longwave Surface albedo Convective cloud

  8. All-sky Clear-sky Mineral dust aerosol Shortwave Longwave

  9. Dust

  10. - Major dust source for Amazon - Large component from March 2004 dust storms

  11. March 2004: an interesting month Loeb et al. (2007) J. Climate, 20, p.582 March 2006 was interesting too…

  12. 1200GMT, 6 March 2006 In these false-colour images, the dust appears pink or magenta, water vapour dark blue, thick high-level clouds red-brown, thin high-level clouds almost black and surface features pale blue or purple. On 6 March, unusually strong northerly winds bring cold air at low levels over the desert, creating a broad front of dust as the air moves south. The location of Niamey is marked by a cross. RADAGAST project: http://radagast.nerc-essc.ac.uk

  13. 1200GMT, 7 March 2006 In these false-colour images, the dust appears pink or magenta, water vapour dark blue, thick high-level clouds red-brown, thin high-level clouds almost black and surface features pale blue or purple. The shallow layer of cold air cannot rise over the mountains of the central Sahara (light blue in colour), so it is forced to follow the valleys. Streaks appear where it accelerates through gaps in the topography. The dust reached Niamey at 0930 on 7 March. RADAGAST project: http://radagast.nerc-essc.ac.uk

  14. 1200GMT, 8 March 2006 In these false-colour images, the dust appears pink or magenta, water vapour dark blue, thick high-level clouds red-brown, thin high-level clouds almost black and surface features pale blue or purple. By 8 March, dust covers the whole of West Africa and is moving out over the Atlantic. • Animation available: http://radagast.nerc-essc.ac.uk

  15. et al… Surface Top of Atmosphere

  16. Radiative transfer models underestimate the solar absorption in the atmosphere during March 2006 dust storm Slingo et al. (2006) GRL,33, L24817

  17. Dust impact on longwave radiation • Large perturbation to Met Office model OLR during summer over west Sahara • Correlates with high mineral dust aerosol optical depth Model minus GERB OLR: July 2006, 12-18 UTC

  18. Consistent with calculations of dust longwave radiative effect Haywood et al. (2005) JGR 110, D05105 Clear-sky OLR bias (Wm-2) in 2003 Calculations: Direct radiative effect Direct plus shortwave feedback effect

  19. All-sky Clear-sky Radiative biases in the Met Office global model Cirrus outflow Marine stratocumulus Shortwave Longwave Convective cloud

  20. Marine Stratocumulus

  21. Curious banding structure • Transition across model levels • Cloud reflectivity bias

  22. Changes in albedo bias (ocean) • Model upgrade (March 2006) reduced but did not remove albedo bias • Compensating errors: ITCZ/stratocumulus

  23. Stratocumulus composites

  24. Cloud liquid water path Bias: model minus GERB; SSM/I; SEVIRI Albedo Liquid Water Path Cloud Reduction in model bias from June to July 2006 - relates to cloud liquid water

  25. LWPWentz: overestimate for low cloud fraction? Overcast boundary layer clouds: good agreement TMIWentz/MODIS LWP Horváth and Davies (2007) JGR 112, D01202

  26. Convective cloud 5th June 2006

  27. Model evaluation: near-real time • Change in model minus GERB flux differences • Relate to change in model physics implementation Model SW albedo 2005 2006 13th March | 14th March

  28. Convective Decay Time-scale • Unrealistically low levels of convective cloud • On-off; common problem in models • Simple fix…

  29. Improved shortwave reflectivity

  30. Increased convective cloud cover • But is the physics any better? • Future work: Comparisons with CloudSat

  31. Gulf of Guinea Model CloudSat 5th July 2006 19th July 2006

  32. Clouds and water vapor • Combine GERB/SEVIRI • Diurnal changes in cloud and humidity • Radiatively driven subsidence • work by Ruth Comer

  33. 2-3 hr lag between tropical convection and upper tropospheric water vapor (Soden 2000, 2004) above: central/South Americaright: Lagrangian tracking

  34. Tracking over Africa difficult?Complex picture locally due to propagating disturbances

  35. Clouds and Water Vapor: Africa ~3-hour lag Work by Ruth Comer

  36. Clear-sky radiative cooling and the atmospheric hydrological cycle • Clear-sky radiative cooling: • radiative convective balance • atmospheric circulation • Earth’s radiation budget • Understand clear-sky budget to understand cloud radiative effect • Datasets: • Reanalyses – observing system • Satellites – calibration and sampling • Models – wrong by definition

  37. Links to precipitation

  38. ERA40 NCEP SRB Tropical Oceans HadISST Ts CWV LWc SFC SMMR, SSM/I Derived:SMMR, SSM/I, Prata) 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Allan (2006) JGR 111, D22105

  39. Surface LWc and water vapour dLWc/dCWV ~ 1.5 Wkg-1 ERA40 NCEP dCWV/dTs ~ 3 kgm-2K-1 Allan (2006) JGR 111, D22105

  40. Clear-sky OLR with surface temperature: + ERBS, ScaRaB, CERES; SRB Calibration or sampling?

  41. ERA40 NCEP SRB Tropical Oceans Surface Net LWc Clear-sky OLR Clear-sky Atmos LW cooling QLWc HadISST ERBS, ScaRaB, CERES Derived Allan (2006) JGR 111, D22105

  42. Linear least squares fit ERA40 NCEP • Tropical ocean: descending regime • Dataset dQLWc/dTs Slope • ERA-40 3.7±0.5 Wm-2K-1 • NCEP 4.2±0.3 Wm-2K-1 • SRB 3.6±0.5 Wm-2K-1 • OBS 4.6±0.5 Wm-2K-1

  43. Implications for tropical precipitation (GPCP)? GPCP P ERA40 QLWc OBS QLWc Pinatubo?

  44. IPCC AR4 models: tropical oceans • CWV • Net LWc • OLRc • Q_LWc

  45. IPCC AR4 models: tropical oceans • QLWc • Precip Ongoing work…

  46. Ongoing work…CMIP3 models

  47. Also considering coupled model experiments including greenhouse gas and natural forcings

  48. Conclusions • Top down-bottom up approach • Good for feedback to modelers • Mineral dust aerosol • Shortwave absorption; longwave radiative effect • Large effect of single events • Marine stratocumulus • Reflectivity and seasonal variability: issues • Deep convection • Intermittent in models; issues with detrainment • Clear-sky radiative cooling • Links to atmospheric hydrological cycle • Need to understand before can understand changes in cloudiness • Observing systems: capturing decadal variability problematic

  49. Spurious variability in ERA40 • Improved performance in water vapour and clear-sky radiation using 24 hour forecasts • Reduced set of reliable observations as input to future reanalyses?

  50. Clear-sky vs resolution

More Related