1 / 17

Public Key Authentication in Wireless Sensor Network (2)

Public Key Authentication in Wireless Sensor Network (2). Jeonil Kang (dreamx@seclab.inha.ac.kr). Public Key Cryptography. Key agreement problem in wireless sensor network “How to set up secret keys between communicating nodes.” Symmetric key techniques

nili
Download Presentation

Public Key Authentication in Wireless Sensor Network (2)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Key Authentication in Wireless Sensor Network (2) Jeonil Kang(dreamx@seclab.inha.ac.kr)

  2. Public Key Cryptography • Key agreement problem in wireless sensor network • “How to set up secret keys between communicating nodes.” • Symmetric key techniques • The secret keys are pre-distributed among sensors before their deployment. • Due to the limitation on memory, symmetric key techniques are not able to achieve both a perfect connectivity and a perfect resilience for large-scale sensor networks. • Public key cryptography • eliminate the connectivity and resilience problems. • Common criticism: computational complexity and communication overhead. • ECC signature verification: 1.62s (160-bit Atmega 128)  PKC becomes widely accepted for WSNs.

  3. Public Key Authentication Non-certificate B B<CA> CA D C<CA> B<CA> B D<E> D<E> B<A> E B<A> A C<CA> C A C PKCA PKA PKE Certificate

  4. Public Key Authentication with Hash • Naïve Scheme: Trusted hash value • instead of trusted public key • This method still has the memory-usage problem. • Memory-Efficient Scheme: Merkle Tree Root Hash Φ(V)=hash(Φ(Vleft)||Φ(Vright)) Φ(Li)=hash(id,pki)

  5. Merkle Tree Root Hash A’s proof H= A idA, pkA, A’s proof Communication Overhead = L × H B Root Hash

  6. Deployment Knowledge

  7. Deployment Knowledge

  8. 2D Grid Based Scheme C S D Proof served by S B S’ A S B A Proof served by C C S D Worst Case

  9. Intersection Node & Loop Model • When a intersection node was compromised, C S B C S B No Way!

  10. Memory / Communication Trade-off 2D Grid Based Scheme (2 Root Hash) This is 1.5D GBS! Basic Scheme (2 Root Hash) = 1D GBS Du Scheme (2 Root Hash)

  11. Basic / Du / 1.5D GBS

  12. 3D GBS on 2D C S D 3D Grid Based Scheme (3 Root Hash) B S’ A

  13. 3D GBS on 3D 3D Grid Based Scheme (3 Root Hash) C S S’ B

  14. 3D GBS on 3D S1 1 3D Grid Based Scheme (3 Root Hash) C 2 3 S2 B

  15. Basic / Du / 2.5D GBS

  16. Basic / Du / 2.5D GBS

  17. M-D GBS M-1 intersection nodes Is This Possible on 2D or 3D?

More Related