40 likes | 137 Views
Explore different scenarios for implementing BITE2 service across sites by analyzing the pros and cons of each approach. Get insights on local vs. centralized solutions and the coordination of implementation activities. Learn which BU locations are responsible for the implementation.
E N D
Site Scenarios We have looked at the following alternatives: • Scenario 1 - BA/BU makes a choice to make use of local solutions at each site to implement their BITE2 service (no own client) • Scenario 2 - BA/BU makes a choice to establish their own design and implement on ALL sites • Scenario 3 - BA/BU makes a mix. Design their own solution and implement on mayor sites, but use local implementations on small sites. • Scenario 4 - BA/BU makes a choice to establish their own design and implement on ALL sites including usage of some of the other companies applications/data
Site Scenarios We are doing tests but it seems that: • Scenario 2 - BA/BU makes a choice to establish their own design and implement on ALL sites • Scenario 4 - BA/BU makes a choice to establish their own design and implement on ALL sites including usage of some of the other companies applications/data are the only alternatives. More information will be given during the BRM-seminar.
Next step? • Demand Support will together with Demand Support Ref. grp make a proposal how to co-ordinate preparation /implementation activities on “small and multiple BA/BU sites” • The Demand Support Ref. Group make a proposal on which BA/BU that will be responsible for which BA/BU location • The proposals will be presented to the BRM’s • The proposals will be presented to the CID-C steering Committee
Demand Support Ref. Group Reference group Demand SupportDick EliassonDavid ZakaiRoger CarlssonThomas BuskasAnna JohanssonStig JohanssonSteve Möller