1 / 12

Decentralization Reforms in Rwanda and Capacity Development for LGs

Decentralization Reforms in Rwanda and Capacity Development for LGs. Kigali, 21/01/2011. Background. Decentralization Policy enacted in 2000 and implemented since 2001 Implementation is done in phases: 1 st phase (2001-2005): laws, policies, institutionalization

Download Presentation

Decentralization Reforms in Rwanda and Capacity Development for LGs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Decentralization Reforms in Rwanda and Capacity Development for LGs Kigali, 21/01/2011

  2. Background • Decentralization Policy enacted in 2000 and implemented since 2001 • Implementation is done in phases: • 1st phase (2001-2005): laws, policies, institutionalization • 2nd phase (2006-2010): strengthening capacities for service delivery and coordination of local development • 3rd phase to run from 2011 – 2015: phase of consolidation, will focus on: • streamlining the institutional and legal framework, • consolidating achievements in governance and service delivery, and • scaling up on local economic development (LED) to support quick socio-economic transformation

  3. Objectives of the National Dec. Policy • Five Strategic Objectives defined for the Policy: • To enable and reactivate local people to participate in initiating, making, implementing, and monitoring decisions and plans that concern them • To strengthen accountability and transparency in Rwanda by making local leaders directly accountable to the communities they serve • To enhance the sensitivity and responsiveness of public administration to the local environment • To develop sustainable economic planning and management capacity at local levels • To enhance effectiveness and efficiency in the planning, monitoring and delivery of services by reducing • The major driving force for CD efforts in Decentralization : to sustain the implementation of the NDP and to achieve its objectives

  4. Capacity Development in Phase 1 • Phase 1 (2001-2005) • Institutionalized decentralization as the new form of administration • the legal and organizational basis was laid • Five levels of government were established: central government, province (12), district (106), sector (1545) and cell (9165). • Legal framework; Fiscal Decentralization Policy and Law defined; Community Development Policy adopted… • CD Efforts characterized by: • Coordination at the Provincial level, • Development partners support organised by province • Netherlands: Cyangugu, Gitarama, Ruhengeri Province • EU: Kigali Rural • Swiss: Kibuye…. • Imbalance: what happens in other provinces?

  5. Capacity Development and Phase 2 • The Second phase (2006 – 2010) was defined after a territorial restructuring (Provinces:4; Districts: 30: Sectors: 416; cells: 2150; Umudugudu:14837) • Specific Objectives of the Reform: • To promote and enhance effectiveness in service delivery at the Sector level • To streamline and strengthen the coordination of “public services” and local economic development at District Level • To institutionalize a Clear demarcation of roles and responsibilities between the CG (Policy, CB, M&E) and the LGs (implementation) • In addition to the strategic objectives of the NPD, CD must pursue the and the 2nd phase objectives

  6. Characteristics of CD during Phase 2 • The District is at the centre of CD support • CD providers: Ministries, donor-supported projects, Int’l NGO’s, .. • But: Weaknesses and Challenges in CD Interventions • Uncoordinated and fragmented : initiated by various stakeholders limiting to their own specific objectives; • Supply-driven by nature: limiting ownership by Districts • Limiting Capacity Building tothe sole training • Absence of quality assurance and certification • No systematic induction to new personnel • Budgetary limitations in LGs

  7. CD for: a strategic orientation for Phase 3 • 3rd phase to run from 2011 – 2015: phase of consolidation, will focus on: • streamlining the institutional and legal framework, • consolidating achievements in governance and service delivery, and • scaling up on local economic development (LED) to support quick socio-economic transformation • CD to pursue the NPD Objectives, the objectives of Phase 2, but in a more coordinated manner through a comprehensive CB Strategy for LGs (combining training , technical assistance and coaching to districts and a mechanism for retention of trained personnel…) .

  8. The Capacity Building Strategy • Long-term vision: Having in place efficient, effective and transparent local governments for effective service delivery: • Mission of the strategy: To ensure that local government have qualified and skilled staff operating in a conductive environment for effective service delivery • Guiding Principles of the Strategy: • Making Capacity Building Demand-Driven • Rethinking adequate mechanisms for quality assurance and standards setting • Avoiding the narrow scope of defining CB as synonymous to training • Ensuring that CB interventions are coordinated and harmonized

  9. Specific Objectives in the next 5 years Objectives for the next 5 years (2011-2015) are to: • Strengthening Coordination among institutions charged with Capacity Development in LGs • Establishing capacity development quality assurance and standardisation system • Integrating a large diversity of CD approaches, including Technical assistance, Coaching and mentoring, systematic induction • Establishing a pooled funding mechanism for LG Capacity Development • Enhancing LG capacity to attract, recruit, motivate, and retain a critical mass of technical and professional skills.

  10. To conclude • Factors that have influenced CD across all the phases of decentralization • Defined objectives (for the Policy and successive reforms) • Responsibilities and functions devolved • Institutional arrangements (Ralga, Riam, NDIS, PSCBS) • External Aid environment • 2001 – 2005: Project support • 2006: Attempt to harmonize following Paris declaration on Aid effectiveness • 2009/2010: Accra Commitment / Division of labor • These factors, while immediately applicable at Central level, take longer period before they are translated in the CD for decentralization

  11. End

More Related