1 / 8

OCP-IP Overview ( ocpip )

Semiconductor IP –Who Should be the Standards Torch Bearer? ( December 5 th 2007, Grenoble, France) Ian R. Mackintosh (Chairman, President & Founder of OCP-IP). OCP-IP Overview ( www.ocpip.org ). Founded – Announced: June ’01 – December ’01 Standard: ONE, The Open Core Protocol

nelia
Download Presentation

OCP-IP Overview ( ocpip )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Semiconductor IP –Who Should be the Standards Torch Bearer?(December 5th 2007, Grenoble, France)Ian R. Mackintosh(Chairman, President & Founder of OCP-IP)

  2. OCP-IP Overview (www.ocpip.org) • Founded – Announced: June ’01 – December ’01 • Standard: ONE, The Open Core Protocol • Members: 200 (85% Corporate, 10% University, 5% Associations) • Working Groups (WG’s) : Strategic, Marketing and 6 Technical • Structure: Global/Virtual (0 employees, 70-200 inc. contractors and member contributors) • Legal: Non-profit, Operational headquarters Beaverton, Oregon, USA

  3. OCP-IP Focus & Importance • Focus: OCP is an IP-Core interface that facilitates re-use in block-based SoC design (also finding homes in FPGA’s) • Importance • Socket-based: separates Computational Core from Communications (the Key to re-use!) • Non-Proprietary • COMPLETE: Data, Control & Test • Established, accompanying high value infrastructure with industry-leading technical advances relating to IP-Core Interface

  4. OCP-IP: What’s Worked? • Infrastructure Development • Contributions (within WG’s/from Corporations) • Collaborations (Associations & Universities) • TTM • Strategic Planning • Program Management • “Need & Greed” • Flexibility (Operations and Relationships) • Technical excellence • Website Communications, etc. …..and, GLOBAL adoption!

  5. OCP-IP: What’s NOT Working? • Members have access to all IP, tools, support, training and advanced developments required for them to excel. So,……. ………..Our Search Failed; no failure to report!

  6. Struggles of (IP) Standards: The PROGRESSION • Awareness/Comprehension: TOO Little or TOO Much? CAUSES • Insufficient resources • $’s, time and/or people RESULTING IN • Incomplete work (little support) • Fragmentation/non-standards • Cause: Lack of leadership, commitment, focus and structure • LATE delivery (little support) • Cause: Lack of leadership, commitment, focus and structure • Traction of tolerable proprietary alternatives Solution: Treat standards as products, with (TIMELY) PROMOTION!

  7. Scoring IMPORTANCE of IP Standards 1 = Waste of Time 10 = Must have to endure IP community Survival 5| 8 Big UsersSmall Providers (Nature found a way (Key to BIZ efficiency and for to drive external suppliers) making money!)

  8. Semiconductor IP –Who Should be the Standards Torch Bearer?Grenoble, France December 5th, 2007Ian R. Mackintosh(Chairman, President & Founder of OCP-IP)

More Related