80 likes | 196 Views
This article examines key mining safety incidents and regulatory practices during the Bush administration. It highlights the stark increase in fatalities and injuries compared to previous years, noting a specific case where a miner was killed and the company fined $440. Additionally, it addresses the trend of fewer fines imposed on mining companies compared to the Clinton administration, providing a comprehensive overview of how these changes affected miner safety and accountability in the industry.
E N D
Set up your paper as shown: Stated or implied in article 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Not in article
For each of the following statements, place a check on your paper to indicate if it was or was not in the article.
#1 One miner was killed in an accident. The company was fined $440.
#2 Fewer fines were levied against mining companies during the Bush administration compared to the Clinton administration.
#3 Deaths and injuries in mining accidents were higher during the Bush administration than in previous years.
#4 One miner lost his leg in an accident. The mining company was not fined.
#5 Deaths and injuries in mining accidents were lower during the Bush administration than in previous years.
One miner was killed in an accident. The company was fined $440. • Fewer fines were levied against mining companies during the Bush administration compared to the Clinton administration. • Deaths and injuries in mining accidents were higher during the Bush administration than in previous years. • One miner lost his leg in an accident. The mining company was not fined. • Deaths and injuries in mining accidents were lower during the Bush administration than in previous years.