1 / 26

Contemporary Best Practices in Distance Education Technology With Implications for Adult Education.

Contemporary Best Practices in Distance Education Technology With Implications for Adult Education. Bill McNutt: Technology specialist, university of Tennessee Division of Outreach and Distance Education – mcnutt@utk.edu - www.outreach.utk.edu/mcnutt

nat
Download Presentation

Contemporary Best Practices in Distance Education Technology With Implications for Adult Education.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contemporary Best Practices in Distance Education Technology With Implications for Adult Education. • Bill McNutt: Technology specialist, university of Tennessee Division of Outreach and Distance Education – mcnutt@utk.edu - www.outreach.utk.edu/mcnutt • Duren Thompson: Research associate for technology training, university of Tennessee center for literacy studies – solveig@utk.edu

  2. What is DE? • Learning that happens when the instructor and student are in different physical locations • First ‘distance education technology’

  3. Why DE? • To reach more students • Because Time = $ • Kids/family • Job issues • Transportation • Course accessibility, e.g. ESOL courses • Confidentiality

  4. Initial Decisions • Synchronous vs. Asynchronous • Independent vs. cohort/group

  5. Synchronous • A synchronous learning environment is one in which the student(s) and instructor attend at the same time, and can all interact. • Classrooms • Sports training • Military training

  6. Synchronous • Pros: • Looks like “school” • Allows for peer tutoring/mentoring • Simulates a traditional classroom environment • Addresses the needs of the Interpersonal Learner • Provides for Immediate Feedback

  7. Synchronous • Cons: • Some retraining required for the instructor • Not self-paced • Can be intimidating for the student • Typically more costly • Typically more work for the instructor • Requires dealing with scheduling issues

  8. Asynchronous • An asynchronous environment is one in which the student and the instructor never meet. • Correspondence school • A text book • Road signs

  9. Asynchronous • Pros: • Self Paced • Schedule Independent • Less expensive • Higher Literacy Level • Addresses the needs of the textual learner

  10. Asynchronous • Cons: • Does not “feel like ‘school.’” • Does not provide a sense of community • Increases feelings of isolation • Does not address the needs of the interpersonal learner. • Does not provide for immediate instructor feedback.

  11. Traditional Correspondence Audio/Video Tapes Stock Production Electronic Mail Television Broadcast Television Video Teleconferencing Internet Teleconferencing WWWeb Delivery Virtual Classrooms DE Modalities

  12. US Mail • Traditional correspondence • Epistolary distance education • Asynchronous

  13. US Mail Pros: • Cheap for program and student • Low start-up cost • Re-training minimal • Unintimidating to instructor and student • Self-paced

  14. US Mail Cons: • literacy level requirements • turn-around time for each assignment/communication • stigma • hard cases • no community • limited learning styles • no real-time interaction w/ instructor

  15. Video/audio tapes - Purchased • checkin/out system - – asynchronous- independent or group • Pros: • re-training minimal, unintimidating to prof and student, self-paced, literacy level requirements, addresses more learning styles, • Cons: • Acquiring tapes, shipping costs, equipment for student, turn-around time for each assignment, no community, no real-time interaction w/ prof., tape attrition, storage

  16. Video/audio tapes - Production • Taping scheduled class – asynchronous- group • Pros: keep pace with cutting edge topics, some community, literacy level requirements, addresses more learning styles, self-paced (less) • Cons: re-training instructor, equipment for student, program equipment - own vs. rent, infrastructure – schedules/timelines

  17. Electronic Mail • Courses via existing e-mail accounts asynchronous- independent • Pros: faster turn around, cheap (if computer/e-mail access exists), self-paced, accommodates disabilities, • Cons: computer access and e-mail account for prof and student, re-training of student & prof, more learning styles require more technology, literacy level

  18. Television - Broadcast • Broadcast TV – one way – asynchronous- independent very similar to video tape • Pros: student needs only TV, no shipping, tape attrition, etc. • Cons: not self-paced, cost of broadcast, limited “time-slots” on public TV, geographic boundaries, more intimidating to prof.

  19. Television - Video Teleconferences • Teleconferencing – two way – synchronous, group • Pros: community (meet some of classmates, hear others ideas), real-time many to one visual interaction w/ instructor, more learning styles, “looks like school” • Cons: $200,000 up front cost per site 20-50 seats, $200/hr – technicians and line fees, hard copies in advance, live TV, intimidating to profs, transportation

  20. Internet Teleconferencing – • Via computers - two way – synchronous – group • Pros: community (meet some of classmates, hear others ideas), real-time many to one visual interaction w/ instructor, more learning styles, “looks like school,” more features (document sharing, whiteboard, chat) • Cons: technician (much lower skill), transportation issue OR equipment for a student, training for student and prof.

  21. Internet Teleconferencing – • two way – synchronous – one to one (Net -meeting) • Pro: office hours, one-to one tutoring w/ instructor or peer, lower cost (one or no cameras), • Con: ONLY one to one, equipment needs, literacy level, training for student and prof., no community,

  22. Web Delivery – • WWWeb Courses - asynchronous independent or group • Pros: Can be very cheap, self-paced, can have community, can have many learning styles, flexible, easy to update for cutting edge, faster turn around • Cons: Site/course development costs, computer access for prof. and student, training for prof & student, literacy level, intimidating to profs and students,

  23. Virtual classrooms – • Via computers synchronous, group • Pros: community (speak and listen), real-time audio (and video) interaction w/ instructor & peers, more learning styles, “structured like school,” more features (application sharing, document sharing, whiteboard, chat), prof. control of interaction, conducive to small-group work, low equipment specs required • Cons: Upfront costs $10-20,000 (to own), technicians, training for prof. and student, intimidating to prof and student, course development,

  24. Recommendations/Issues • Authentication • Building community vs. authentication • Retraining of staff – instructors • “The post office/internet ate my homework” • Funding

  25. For Further Reference Jackson, Robert (2001). Web Based learning Resources Library, University of Tennessee Division of Outreach and Distance Education. http://www.outreach.utk.edu/weblearning Additional Sources: • Cahoon, Brad, Ed. (1998, summer). Adult Learning and the Internet, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 78, 1-82. • Klass, Gary (2000, July). Plato as Distance Education Pioneer: Status and Quality Threats of Internet Education, First Monday, 5, 1-16. http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_7/klass • Phillips, Vicky (1998). On the Evils of technology in Academia, Get Educated, 1-5. http://www.geteducated.com/articles/eviltech.htm • Spencer, Bruce (1997). Adult Education On-Line, 1997 AERC Proceedings, 1-6. http://www.edst.educ.ubc/aerc/1997/97spencer.htm

  26. For Copies of the Presentation Copies of this presentation available via the WWW at either location: • http://cls.coe.utk.edu/literacy_resources/ libraries/coabe01.html • http://www.ce.utk.edu/McNutt/ • Contact the Presenters: • Bill McNutt – mcnutt@utk.edu - www.outreach.utk.edu/mcnutt • Duren Thompson – solvieg@utk.edu

More Related