1 / 18

The HONDA phenomenon

The HONDA phenomenon. Presented by Group 7 Mukundhan J.V.D.Prasad Nitin Rawat C.Amritha. BACKGROUND. 1946:Postwar, Soichiro Honda, set up the Honda Technical Research Institute to service Japans need for transport by retrofitting bicycles with engines (mopeds)

nairi
Download Presentation

The HONDA phenomenon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The HONDA phenomenon Presented by Group 7 Mukundhan J.V.D.Prasad Nitin Rawat C.Amritha

  2. BACKGROUND • 1946:Postwar, Soichiro Honda, set up the Honda Technical Research Institute to service Japans need for transport by retrofitting bicycles with engines (mopeds) • 1948Founded Honda Motor Co., Ltd. • 1949:With help, developed 2-stroke,D-type, 3hp engine that enjoyed brief popularity • Late 1949:Competitors leapfrogged to quieter 4 stroke forcing Honda to take on a partner, Takeo Fujisawa. • 1951:Develops breakthrough superior 4 stroke, improving demand • 1958: 50cc Supercub, auto clutch, 3-speed transmission, auto starter • 1959:Collection of semi-independent activities with no standardized procedures or drawings. Significant participant in industry(23% mkt share)

  3. 1960:Sets up automated plant with 30,000 unit per month capacity. In the US establishes a base of 40 dealers • By 1961: Developed superior motorcycle design, winning Isle of Man manufacturers prize. • 1963:Theme developed- ““U Meet The Nicest People On A Honda” • Late 1963: Automobiles introduced into product line • 1964: Ceases to ship on a consignment basis and adopts cash on delivery mechanism • Late 1972:Both Fujisawa and Honda retire as a mark of letting younger men take their lead • 1981: Held 41% of market share of Motorcycle Production in Japan

  4. Japan, post WW II • All large cities destroyed, the industries and the transportation networks were severely damaged. • Theoccupation of Japan by the Allied Powers started in August 1945 and ended in April 1952, the entire operation being carried out by the US. • The empire of Japan collapsed leading to formation of a democratic constitution of Japan. During the postwar period, Japan became an economic power state. This period is characterized by the US-Japan Alliance such as the United States Forces Japan. • The occupation ended with the San-Francisco peace treaty signing in 1952. Japan's Self Defence Force was established in 1954. • Japans economy flourished post the Korean War. The economic growth resulted in a quick rise of the living standards, changes in society and the stabilization of thee government • Japan's relations to the Soviet Union were normalized in 1956, the ones to China in 1972.

  5. How it started.. • 1960-80  Strategic reversal in world motorcycle industry • Japanese introduction into the market began with HMC • Japan’s post world war devastation • Honda Technical Research Institute set up in 1946reflecting technology based strategy • Japanese manufacturers invested in one design and milked. • Honda departed • Offered a multi-product line • Leader in product innovation • Exploitation of economies of scale production

  6. An example.. • In 1958,Honda identified a market segment  small, unintimidating m’cycle for small delivery businesses • They designed a product specifically for this application • The 50cc bike was an explosive success! • Unit sales reached 6000/month in less that 6 months from introduction • Honda gambled, invested in a highly automated plant (10 times excess capacity than demand at time of construction!)

  7. International expansion • In ‘59, HMC entered the American market. • Foreign producers relied on distributors. Honda established American Honda Motor Company and pushed their lightweight bikes • Advertising represented a concentrated effort to overcome the unsavory image of motorcyclists  ‘You meet the nicest people on a Honda’ • The strategy was phenomenally successful. US sales rose from $500,000 in ‘60 to $77 million in ’65 • Expansion of the m’cycle market in the early ‘60s benefited the British & American producers as well • ‘Basically, we do not believe in the lightweight market’

  8. Meanwhile, Japanese producers continued to grow in other export countries • In ‘65, domestic sales fell to 59% from 98% in ’59 while production volume had increased almost fivefold from 285,000 to 1.4 million units • By the mid 70’s, Japanese producers had come to dominate a market shared by European and American markets 20 years earlier

  9. Glimpses of strategic innovations • Used its productivity-based cost advantage & RnD capability to introduce new models at competitive prices • Throughput of only 18 months • ‘Cold storage’ of designs • Since ’60, Honda consistently outspent its competitors in advertising • Established largest dealership network ; Honda had been willing to take short term losses to build up adequate SnD network

  10. Honda’s ‘marketing philosophy’ • Huge emphasis on market share and sales volume, rather than short-term profitability • First question asked to a prospective dealer  level of his market share in his local area • Some of the policies of the ‘philosophy’ : • Constant product upgradation; threat/opportunity • Prices set at levels to achieve target market share • Effective marketing systems where serious competition • Plans & objectives look to long-term payoff • As a result, average AGR of big 4 was 15-25%

  11. Selling/Distribution systems • Includes all the activities of the marketing companies in each national market • Sales rep at the dealer level • Warranty and service support • Dealer support • Advertising and promotion • Market planning and control • Manufacturers’ products and SnD system influence sales both directly(retail) and proximately(dealer network)

  12. Squashing a myth.. • The Japanese are ‘dumping’ their products in the US market  ‘74 • Prices in the US are so much higher than those of the same products in Japan • Premiums are very high even after allowing for the duty, freight and packing in shipping bikes • Plenty of scope for them to be even more competitive in the future

  13. Japanese price performance • The top 4 Japanese companies had high overall market share, so they dominated the pricing of the industry • Upon analysing the experience curves based on price performance, we find : • Slope of 88%  <50 cc bikes • Slope of 81%  50-125cc bikes • Slope of 78%  125-250cc bikes

  14. Cost performance • Implications of the downward trends in prices was due to experience-based cost reductions • Most of the Japanese players also forayed into other markets (cars, etc) and were ‘subsidising’ their losses there from the bike industry

  15. Conclusions/Summary • Failure to achieve favourable cost position – including significant cost reductions over time  vulnerability • High rates of growth and production levels resulted in superior productivity and market share • Value added per employee – 4 times more than western competitors • Emphasis on market share nailed it!

  16. Thankyou

  17. Proposed questions • 1.Compare and contrast the two descriptions of Honda Corporation’s start-up, early growth, and entry into the U.S. motorcycle market. How does each case explain Honda’s success? • 2. What concept of strategy is implied in each case? • 3. What do these cases tell us about the job of the general manager? • 4. Question for Crystallizing Analysis • 1.a What is the explanation for Honda’s success in the U.S. market according to the (A) case? • 1.b What is the explanation for Honda’s success according to the B-case? • Optional follow-on question after each of the above question: • -What is the concept of strategy in the (A or B) case? • -Who developed the strategy?

  18. Which case is correct in a factual sense? Which one is more convincing? Why? • 6. What is the value of the (A) case to managers? • Optional follow-on question: • -When could the analysis in the (A) case have made? • -When had Honda won the battle? • -when is the type of analysis in the (A) case useful? • 7. What is the value of stories like those told in the (B) case? Is Honda’s history anything more than idiosyncratic events? • Follow on questions? • Was the success all luck? • What was the role played by Honda and Fujisawa? • 8. If you had been in charge of Honda’s entry into the U.S., would you have done anything differently? Could you have improved the performance in any way? How? • 9. If you had to choose a phrase word or image to describe these two cases, what would it be?

More Related