390 likes | 482 Views
Explore the transformation of online paid content through case studies on The Times, Freemium models, and the impact on revenue and user engagement. Dive into different approaches and their success rates to gain insights into the future of digital content monetization.
E N D
The evolution of paid content: big experiments, diverse outcomes Peter Kirwan March 2011
Consumers & paid content Q: “To what extent are you willing to pay for the following sources of online content?” (Nielsen 2010: EMEA adults, n = 27,000)
Consumers & paid content II Q: “Which of the following types of digital content would you pay for in the future?” (Forrester Q310: n = 14,247 European online consumers aged 12+)
09/07: NYT paywall comes down 09/05: NYT paywall goes up 03/11: NYT paywall 2goes up 07/10: Times (UK) paywall goes up UK online display market down by 4% YOY (Screen Digest) The story of free Newspaper industry digital advertising revenues 2004-2013 in US and Europe (PwC, Wilofsky Gruen: 2010)
Last time / This time • Familiar fears • Online display will never be enough • Single revenue source = cyclical • New factors • B2B: classified & display migration • Accelerating print circulation declines (broadband) • Emerging technology solutions • Different response • Top-level ideology (Murdoch) • Cartel-like behaviour
B2B ad markets: western Europe Source: Trade magazine ad revenues in western Europe: PwC/Wilkowsky Gruen Associates
Different starting points Source: Valerie-Anne Bleyen & Leo Van Hove, Western European newspapers & their online revenue models (2007)
Six models • Lockdown • Freemium • Metered • Time-limited • Site licensing • Micropayments
Lockdown: The Times • Google does index thetimes.co.uk • But: no First Click Free (or 2nd, or 3rd) • Twitter/Facebook clicks hit paywall • Sampling option: £1 for 1 day (site only) • Sampling option: £1 for 30 days (full sub) • Full price = £8.66/month • Trial access requires cc details
Lockdown: The Times • Pre-paywall: 21m monthly uniques • September 2010 (GNM/Hitwise analysis): • 54,000 users/month behind paywall • 28,000 = all access print subscribers • 26,000 = “paying for digital content”
Lockdown: The metrics • November 2010 (Official metrics) • 100K print subs activate web access • 105K “paid for customer sales” • c.50K “monthly subscribers” (web, iPad & Kindle) • “Many of rest” = 1 day subs / “single digital copies” • Frequency: • Old site: one visit per fortnight • New site: three visits per week (x6)
Lockdown: The metrics • March 2011 (Official update) • Monthly digital subscribers: • 79K “monthly digital subscribers” (web/iPad/Kindle) • Up from 50K (October 2010) • Conversion rate declining or churn very high? • BUT: “Paid-for customer sales” • 105,000 in first four months • 117,000 in second four month period • Better marketing = more sampling?
Lockdown: Revenue • Times/Sunday Times: Home page traffic • UK uniques, Dec 2010 = 1.22m • UK uniques, Jan 2011 = 1.61m • Subscriber conversions/month at 0.6% • 9,660 new web subscribers per month • 115,920 per year = £12m revenue annualised Source for traffic data: UKOM/Nielsen, January 2011
£12m/year: Success? • Positives • Recurring revenue base (minus churn) • Deep customer insights • Radically higher engagement • Number of paying readers up overall • Sky/News cross-platform bundling to come
£12m/year: Success? • Negatives • Cost of customer acquisition • Churn (. . . 30%?) • Buzz: “newsletter economics” (Clay Shirky) • Silence on advertising performance • Advertisers want big numbers (+ social) • 7-day newsroom costs £100m/year
Collateral effects • UK national newspapers now trialling or working on paid content: • Daily Telegraph (metered approach) • Daily Mail (working with Google One Pass) • Trinity Mirror (niche sites?) • Or willing to contemplate it: • The Independent • The Guardian (£40m “free” revenue)
Freemium “If your free service is loved and you do a good job articulating the value that comes with the paid service, you can convert to paying users with good results.” -- Fred Wilson, 2006
Freemium • Positives • Maximize monetization: niche/mass markets • Free content = cost-effective marketing • Considerations • Fixed or shifting categories for free/paid? • Journalists like eyeballs • What is valuable?
Freemium • Considerations • Poor free product = low incentive • Difference must be self-evident • Web + print = free + paid? • Build a new premium product? • Examples • Times Select (news free, opinion paid) • Macworld Insider (IDG)
Freemium: Macworld Insider • “The ultimate way to experience Macworld” • Full content RSS feeds • Members-only newsletters & forum • Searchable PDF back issue archive • Single page long-form content • No online advertising • Live chat with editors & writers • Club discounts • $39.95/year: standalone • $19.95/year: for print subscribers
Metered • Customer-centric variant on freemium • Positives • Freedom to dial access up or down • Tiered access: free, registered, subscription • Additional flexibility: inbound social links • Editors don’t make free/paid decisions • Keep & maximise ad revenues
Metered • Considerations • User confusion (Paywall? Pay-hedge?) • User frustration (value of n+1 story?) • Free riders gaming the system • Do metered sites “punish” biggest fans? • Pricing must be finely calibrated
Metered: New York Times • Estd. annual paywall revenues: $100m* • Highly profitable incremental revenues • NYT digital ad revenue: $150m • Aim to retain all of this ad revenue * Gordon Crovitz, former publisher of the Wall Street Journal and co-founder of Journalism Online: 03/11
Time-limited • Paid content = bundling • By users: lockdown, freemium, metering • But you can also bundle content by time: • Milliseconds: machine-readable news • Minutes: human-readable online news • Hours: print curation day/week/month • Archives: long-term value (Long Tail) • PDF-based magazine archives
Site licensing/corporate subs • The FT’s strategy • Pull back from third-party paid aggregation • Press forward with in-house sales • Result #1: Direct customer relationships • Result #2: Significant owned revenue stream • Incisive Media (UK B2B publisher) • Corporate subscriptions growing rapidly • Customer relationship: data analysis • Long sales cycle: consultative sell
Micropayments “The way Walter Isaacson phrases it, I thought of hypertext in 1960 just in order to make micropayment possible. . . This has it inside out. I came up with the idea of micropayment to make hypertext possible.” -- Ted Nelson, computing visionary
Micropayments “You’re going to see within the next year an extraordinary movement on the web of systems for micropayment. . . “ -- Nicholas Negroponte, 2000
Micropayments “Here’s the short answer for why micropayments fail: users hate them.” -- Clay Shirky, 2000
Consumers & micropayments Q: “I would rather pay for individual pieces of content (micropayments) instead of subscribing to an entire web site” (Nielsen 2010)
Consumers & micropayments II Q: “How would you prefer to pay to view news site content?” (Harris/Paid Content 2010: n = 1,188 adults aged 16-64)
Some final thoughts • Paid content ecosystem: early stages • Moving beyond “free”/ad monoculture • Emerging low-friction transaction platforms • Increasing corporate experimentation • Is text-based media different? • If you build it, will they will buy it? • Diversity is core to evolution. . .
To order the full 70+ page Paywall Strategies for Online Content Intelligence report http://www.TheMediaBriefing.com/paywall Register for a free executive summary and we’ll send you a special offer to buy the report at a 25% FIPP discount You can also sign up for free weekly newsletters: http://www.TheMediaBriefing.com/newsletters
Thank you Peter Kirwan Phone: +44 (0)7803 975234 Email: peter.kirwan@fullrun.con Twitter: @petekirwan Blog: fullrunner.com