Statistical data analysis
1 / 18

Statistical Data Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :

Statistical Data Analysis. Prof. Terry A. Ring, Ph. D. Dept. Chemical & Fuels Engineering University of Utah. Making Measurements. Choice of Measurement Equipment Accuracy – systematic error associated with measurement.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Statistical Data Analysis' - naava

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Statistical data analysis l.jpg
Statistical Data Analysis

  • Prof. Terry A. Ring, Ph. D.

  • Dept. Chemical & Fuels Engineering

  • University of Utah

Making measurements l.jpg
Making Measurements

  • Choice of Measurement Equipment

    • Accuracy – systematic error associated with measurement.

    • Precision – random error associated with measurement.

Definitions l.jpg

  • Error – the difference between the measured quantity and the ”true value.”

  • The “true value” is not known!!!

    • So how do you calculate the error??

  • Random errors - the disagreement between the measurements when the experiment is repeated

    • Is repeating the measurement on the same sample a new experiment?

    • Systematic errors - constant errors which are the same for all measurements.

    • Bogus Data – mistake reading the instrument

Random error sources l.jpg
Random Error Sources

  • Judgement errors, estimate errors, parallax

  • Fluctuating Conditions

  • Digitization

  • Disturbances such as mechanical vibrations or static electricty caused by solar activity

  • Systematic Error Sources

  • Calibration of instrument

  • Environmental conditions different from calibration

  • Technique – not at equilibrium or at steady state.

Statistics l.jpg

  • Mean xM

  • Deviation xi-xM

  • Standard Deviation 

  • Confidence level or uncertainty,

    • 95% confidence = 1.96 

    • 99% confidence = 2.58 

  • Please note that Gaussian distributions do not rigorously apply to particles- log-normal is better.

  • Mean and standard deviation have different definitions for non-Gaussian Distributions

  • Comparison of means student s t test l.jpg
    Comparison of means – Student’s t-test

    • v= n1+n2-2

    • use the t-value to calculate the probability, P, that the two means are the same.

    E stimating uncertainties or estimating errors in calculated quantities with partial derivatives l.jpg
    Estimating Uncertainties or Estimating Errors in Calculated Quantities –with Partial Derivatives

    • G=f(y1,y2,y3,…)

    Way around the partial derivatives l.jpg
    Way around the Partial Derivatives

    This approach applies no matter how large the uncertainties (Lyons, 1991).

    (i) Set all xi equal to their measured values and calculate f. Call this fo.

    (ii) Find the n values of f defined by

    fi = f(x1,x2,...,xi+si,...,xn) (11)

    (iii) Obtain sf from


    If the uncertainties are small this should give the same result as (10). If the uncertainties are large, this numerical approach will provide a more realistic estimate of the uncertainty in f. The numerical approach may also be used to estimate the upper and lower values for the uncertainty in f because the fi in (11) can also be calculated with xi+ replaced by xi-.

    Slide11 l.jpg

    Equation Used




    (12) with +


    (12) with -


    Now try the same calculation using the spread sheet method. The dimensionless form of (12) is (after taking the square root)


    The propagated fractional uncertainties using (15) and (17) are compared in Table 4.

    A further advantage of the numerical approach is that it can be used with simulations. In other words, the function f in (12) could be a complex mathematical model of a distillation column and f might be the mole fraction or flow rate of the light component in the distillate.

    Table 4. Uncertainties in Gas Velocity Calculated from (15) and (17)

    See web page with sample calculation done with Excel

    Fitting data l.jpg
    Fitting Data

    • Linear Equation – linear regression

    • Non-linear Equation

      • Linearize the equation- linear regression

      • Non-linear least squares

    Rejection of data points l.jpg
    Rejection of Data Points

    • Maximum Acceptable Deviations (Chauvenet’s Criterion)

    Example l.jpg

    • xi-xM/=8.9-8.2/0.3=2.33

    • xi-xM/=7.9-8.2/0.3=1.0

    Regression l.jpg

    • Linear Regression

      • good for linear equations only

    • Linearize non-linear equation first

      • linearization leads to errors

    • Non-linear Regression

      • most accurate for non-linear equations

      • See Mathcad example

    Residence time measurements l.jpg
    Residence Time Measurements






    Slide17 l.jpg

    Non-Linear Fit

    Linearized Eq. Fit

    Flow Calc.s


    Time (min)