1 / 71

STABILIZATION & LOCALITY

STABILIZATION & LOCALITY. Shay Kutten Technion, Israel. Recall: Traditional methods are global. * Dijkstra- 1 fault- O( n ) Time ; f faults- o( fn ) time * [Katz, Perry]- 1 st general method, 1 fault- O( n ) time (1) self stab bcast freezees all nodes

naasir
Download Presentation

STABILIZATION & LOCALITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STABILIZATION & LOCALITY Shay Kutten Technion, Israel

  2. Recall: Traditional methods are global * Dijkstra- 1 fault-O(n) Time; f faults- o(fn) time * [Katz, Perry]- 1st general method, 1 fault- O(n) time (1) self stab bcast freezees all nodes (2) global self-stab snapshot to a leaser (3) leader checks global state. (4) Leader initializes every node (if faulty) (5) bcast unfreezes nodes

  3. Recall: Traditional methods are global(continuted) * Global reset (general) methods, 1 fault- O(n) time [Afek, Kutten, Yung], [Awerbuch, Patt-Shamir, Vargheses], [Awerbuch, K., Mansour, Patt-Shamir, Varghese] (1) bcast freezes all nodes (2) reset to a specific initial state [Dolev, Herman] superstabilizing global reset: (2’) reset to a state “nearest” to current state (still 1 fault- O(n) time)

  4. Another look at Dijkstra’s algorithm

  5. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 = 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 7  8 Global effect example leader

  6. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 leader 8 8 7 = 8 8 7 token 8 7 7 8 8 7 Global effect example

  7. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 leader 8 8 7 = 8 8 7 token 8 7 8 8 8 7 Global effect example

  8. 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 leader 8 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 Global effect example

  9. 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 leader 8 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 Global effect example

  10. 7 7 8 7 8 8 8 8 leader 8 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 Global effect example

  11. 7 7 8 7 8 7 8 8 leader 8 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 Global effect example

  12. The effect of one fault circles whole ring 7 7 8 7 8 7 8 7 leader 8 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 Global effect sample

  13. General purpose computer A B Fast stupid switch E C D Fast route from A to C, passing only B’s stupid switch, not B’s general purpose computer. Possible since route is preset. Another example of self stab in industry

  14. A B E C D In bcast how does A’s stupid switch detect that it already received the bcast Another example of self stab in Industry

  15. A B E C D (non- self stab) solution- stupid switch forwards only over ports Ports of links marked tree Another example of self stab in industry

  16. A B fault E C D (non- self stab) solution- (stupid) switch forwards only over ports Ports of links marked tree. Vulnerable to state fault: suppose the “tree” is really a cycle. Another example of self stab in industry

  17. root A pulse pulse E B C D Industrial solutions to the self stab problem(1) Digital’s LAN bridges solution

  18. root A pulse pulse E B pulse pulse C D Industrial Solutions to the self stab problem(1) Digital’s LAN Bridges Solution

  19. root A pulse pulse E B pulse pulse C D pulse Industrial Solutions to the self stab problem(1) Digital’s LAN Bridges Solution

  20. root A 6 6 E B C D Hop counter decreased. When hop counter reaches 0, discard message. Industrial Solutions to the self stab problem(2) IBM’s ATM Solution

  21. root A 6 6 E B 5 5 C D Hop counter decreased. When hop counter reaches 0, discard message. Industrial Solutions to the self stab problem (2) IBM’s ATM Solution

  22. root A E B 5 5 C D 4 4 4 Hop counter decreased. When hop counter reaches 0, discard message. Industrial Solutions to the self stab problem (2) IBM’s ATM Solution

  23. root A E B 3 3 3 C D 4 4 4 3 Hop counter decreased. When hop counter reaches 0, discard message. Industrial Solutions to the self stab problem(1) Digital’s LAN Bridges Solution

  24. root A 2 2 E B 2 3 3 2 C D 3 Hop counter decreased. When hop counter reaches 0, discard message. Industrial solutions to the self stab problem(1) Digital’s LAN bridges solution

  25. Scallability • Industrial solutions are global. They do not scale well • Conventional self stab protocols are global. They do not scale well

  26. (Local “checking” [Awerbuch, Patt-Shamir, Varghese]) root 0 1 14 2 14 13 3 A cycle will be detected by a node seeing Only its parent’s state and its own state. 12 4 5 11 6 10 7 Local detection [Afek, Kutten, Yung]

  27. 2(A) 1(A) D B root A 0(C) C 0(A) root G E 2(A) 1(A) H F 1(C) 0(A) Local checking of a spanning tree, with a root

  28. Any graph marking function is locally checkable • Any algorithm global state is locally checkable • For any bit complexity Cfunction with local checking bit complexity O(C) • Some complexities for interesting marking functions are known • Many other problems are open Local checking of other functions

  29. Goal: (unknown)f faults O(f) time for correction Idea: Diameter of faults is f. Prevent faults expansion, shrink faulty area. 0 1 14 2 14 13 3 fault 12 4 22 11 23 25 24 5 10 6 7 Possibly consistent faults From local checking to local correction

  30. Goal: (unknown)f faults O(f) time for correction Idea: Diameter of faults is f. Prevent faults expansion, shrink faulty area. 0 1 14 2 14 13 3 fault 12 4 22 11 23 (“impossible” if faulty majority) 25 24 5 10 6 7 Possibly consistent faults From local checking to local correction

  31. For example: need to prevent expansion of Faulty area: recall Dijkstra’s algorithm

  32. 7 7 8 7 8 7 8 8 leader 8 8 8 7 8 7 token 7 8 7 f faults create “gap” or “bump” of length f.

  33. T T T f faults create “gap” or “bump” of length f.

  34. val2 val1 Adversary spoils (ones) minority of replicated val1 and of states. Alg. Recovers val1 everywhere. A B val5 D C E val3 val4 Another example of expanding faulty area: Stable Value Problem

  35. val1 val1 A B val5 D C E val1 val1 val’1 val1 val’1 Stable Value Problem Adversary spoils (ones) minority of replicated val1 and of states. Alg. Recovers val1 everywhere.

  36. val2 val1 A B val5 D C E val3 val4 Reducing a general problem to the Stable Value Problem B can compute any func(val1, val2, val3,val4, val5) if it receives every correct vali.

  37. val1 val1 A B “Simple” since E’s vote can be spoiled in D on the way to B. val1 D C E val1 val1 “Simple” but global solution:consensus voting

  38. val1 A B Time = O(diameter) even for one fault. Desired: few faults short time val1 D C E val1 val1 “Simple” but global solution:consensus voting val1

  39. Local voting does not solve Minority faulty notes but local majority everywhere

  40. In O(f) time get >2f votes so majority is non faulty A 2f Idea 1: For (unknown) f faults get votes (values) from radius 2f

  41. In O(f) time get >2f authentic votes so majority is non faulty A 2f C C’s vote at A is authentic (though faulty) B’s vote at A is NOT authentic B Idea 1: For (unknown) f faults get votes (values) from radius 2f

  42. 1 D A B C 1 E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  43. 1 A said: “1” D A B C 1 E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  44. 1 A said: “1” D A B C A said: “0” 1 E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  45. 1 A said: “1” D A B C A said: “0” 1 A said: “0” E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  46. 1 A said: “1” D A B C A said: “0” 1 A said: “0” E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  47. 1 A said: “1” D A B C A said: “0” 1 A said: “0” E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  48. 1 A said: “1” D A B C A said: “0” 1 A said: “0” E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  49. 1 A said: “1” D A B C A said: “0” 1 A said: “0” E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

  50. Actually, A said: “1” 1 A said: “1” D A B C 1 A said: “0” E Bcast (vote sending) spreading faults problem under state faults

More Related