1 / 45

Chapter 16: Population Genetics and Evolution

Exam #2: Dec 22. 2-3.30 pm. Exam Hall Chapters: 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16 (Adib Kfoury proctoring) Homework assignment: due today. Chapter 16: Population Genetics and Evolution. Robert E. Ricklefs The Economy of Nature, Fifth Edition. Maintenance of Genetic Variation 1. A paradox:

naasir
Download Presentation

Chapter 16: Population Genetics and Evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Exam #2: Dec 22. 2-3.30 pm. Exam HallChapters: 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16(Adib Kfoury proctoring)Homework assignment: due today

  2. Chapter 16: Population Genetics and Evolution Robert E. Ricklefs The Economy of Nature, Fifth Edition

  3. Maintenance of Genetic Variation 1 • A paradox: • natural selection cannot produce evolutionary change without genetic variation • however, both stabilizing and directional selection tend to reduce genetic variation: • how does evolution continue under such circumstances? • does availability of genetic variation ever limit the rate of evolutionary change?

  4. Maintenance of Genetic Variation 2 • Mutation and migration supply populations with new genetic variation. • Spatial and temporal variation tend to maintain variation by favoring different alleles at different times and places. • When heterozygotes have a higher fitness than homozygotes, the relative fitness of each allele depends on its frequency in the population (frequency-dependent selection): • alleles are selected for when at low frequency and against when at high frequency • heterozygote superiority is also called heterosis

  5. How much genetic variation? • About 1/3 of genes that encode enzymes involved in cellular metabolism show variation in most species: • about 10% of these are heterozygous in any given individual • however, most genetic variation is apparently neutral or has negative effects when expressed • thus most variation has no fitness consequences or is subject to stabilizing selection

  6. Genetic Variation is Important • Under changing environmental conditions, the reserve of genetic variation may take on positive survival value. • There seems to be enough genetic variation in most populations so that evolutionary change is a constant presence.

  7. Evolutionary Changes in Natural Populations • Evolutionary changes have been widely documented, particularly in species that have evolved rapidly in the face of environmental changes caused by humans: • cyanide resistance in scale insects (Chapter 9) • pesticide and herbicide resistance among agricultural pests and disease vectors • increasing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics • In each case, genetic variation in the gene pool allowed these populations to respond to changed conditions.

  8. Useful Conclusions from Population Genetics Studies • Every population harbors some genetic variation that influences fitness. • Changes in selective factors in the environment are usually met by evolutionary responses. • Rapid environmental changes caused by humans will often exceed the capacity of a population to respond by evolution; the consequence is extinction.

  9. Chapter 17: Predation and Herbivory Robert E. Ricklefs The Economy of Nature, Fifth Edition

  10. Consumer-Resource Interactions • All life forms are both consumers and victims of consumers. • Consumer-resource interactions organize biological communities into consumer chains (food chains): • consumers benefit at the expense of their resources • populations are controlled from below by resources and from above by consumers

  11. Some Definitions • Predators catch individuals and consume them, removing them from the prey population. • Parasites consume parts of a living prey organism, or host: • parasites may be external or internal • a parasite may negatively affect the host but does not directly remove it from the population

  12. More Definitions • Parasitoids consume the living tissues of their hosts, eventually killing them: • parasitoids combine traits of parasites and predators • Herbivores eat whole plants or parts of plants: • may act as predators (eating whole plants) or as parasites (eating parts of plants): • grazers eat grasses and herbaceous vegetation • browsers eat woody vegetation

  13. Parisitoid wasps develop inside the larvae or pupae of other insects

  14. Detritivores occupy a special niche. • Detritivores consume dead organic material, the wastes of other species: • have no direct affect on populations that produce these resources: • do not affect the abundance of their food supplies • do not influence the evolution of their resources • are important in the recycling of nutrients within ecosystems

  15. Predators have adaptations for exploiting their prey. • Predators vary in size relative to their prey: • predators may be much larger than their prey (whales are far larger than krill and small fish) • prey are rarely much larger than their predators: • beyond a certain prey size, a predator cannot successfully subdue and consume the prey • cooperative hunters are an exception, taking prey substantially larger than themselves

  16. Form and Function Match Diet • Form and function of predators are closely tied to diet: • vertebrate teeth are adapted to dietary items: • horses have upper and lower incisors used for cutting fibrous stems of grasses, flat-surfaced molars for grinding • deer lack upper incisors, simply grasping and tearing vegetation, but also grinding it • carnivores have well-developed canines and knifelike premolars to secure and cut prey

  17. A predator’s form and function are closely tied to its diet. (a) upper incisors are used to cut plant material; (b) flat-surfaced molars for grinding plant material; (c) knifelike premolars secure prey and tear flesh

  18. More Predator Adaptations • The variety of predator adaptations is remarkable: • consider grasping and tearing functions: • forelegs for many vertebrates • feet and hooked bills in birds • distensible jaws in snakes • digestive systems also reflect diet: • plant eaters feature elongated digestive tracts with fermentation chambers to digest long, fibrous molecules comprising plant structural elements

  19. Distensible jaws: shift the articulation of the jaw with the skull from the quadrate bone to the supratemporal

  20. Digestive tracts of consumers are adapted to their diets. Digestive organs of herbivores > carnivores

  21. Prey have adaptations for escaping their predators. • Prey escape mechanisms are remarkably diverse: • in animals: • swift escape • capability of early predator detection • hiding or seeking refuge • sensitive mechanisms for detecting predators • in plants: • thorns and defensive chemicals that dissuade herbivores

  22. A bombardier beetle sprays a noxious liquid at the temperature of boiling water toward a predator

  23. Crypsis and Warning Coloration • Through crypsis, animals blend with their backgrounds; such animals: • are typically palatable or edible • match color, texture of bark, twigs, or leaves • are not concealed, but mistaken for inedible objects by would-be predators • Behaviors of cryptic organisms must correspond to their appearances.

  24. Cryptic appearances (a) mantid; (b) stick insect; (c) lantern fly

  25. Warning Coloration • Unpalatable animals may acquire noxious chemicals from food or manufacture these chemicals themselves: • such animals often warn potential predators with warning coloration or aposematism: • predators learn to avoid such animals after unpleasant experiences • certain aposematic colorations occur so widely that predators may have evolved innate aversions

  26. Unpalatable organisms

  27. Why aren’t all prey unpalatable? • Chemical defenses are expensive, requiring large investments of energy and nutrients. • Some noxious animals rely on host plants for their noxious defensive chemicals: • not all food plants contain such chemicals • animals utilizing such chemicals must have their own means to avoid toxic effects

  28. Batesian Mimicry • Certain palatable species mimic unpalatable species (models), benefiting from learning experiences of predators with the models. • This relationship has been named Batesian mimicry in honor of discoverer Henry Bates. • Experimental studies have demonstrated benefits to the mimic: • predators quickly learn to recognize color patterns of unpalatable prey • mimics are avoided by such predators

  29. Harmless mantid (b) and moth (c) evolved to resemble a wasp (a)

  30. Müllerian Mimicry • Müllerian mimicry occurs among unpalatable species that come to resemble one another: • many species may be involved • each species is both model and mimic • process is efficient because learning by predator with any model benefits all other members of the mimicry complex • certain aposematic colors/patterns may be widespread within a particular region

  31. Costa Rican butterflies and moths

  32. Parasites have adaptations to ensure their dispersal. • Parasites are usually much smaller than their hosts and may live either externally or internally: • internal parasites exist in a benign environment: • both food and stable conditions are provided by host • parasites must deal with a number of challenges: • host organisms have mechanisms to detect and destroy parasites • parasites must disperse through hostile environments, often via complicated life cycles with multiple hosts, as seen in Plasmodium, the parasite that causes malaria

  33. Parasite-Host Systems: A Balancing Act • The parasite-host interaction represents a balance between parasite virulence and host defenses: • immune system of host can recognize and disable parasites • but parasites may multiply rapidly before an immune response can be deployed

  34. Parasites may defeat a host’s immune response. • Circumventing the host’s immune system is a common parasite strategy: • some parasites suppress the host’s immune system (AIDS virus) • other parasites coat themselves with proteins that mimic the host’s own proteins (Schistosoma) • some parasites continually coat their surfaces with novel proteins (trypanosomes)

  35. Cross-Resistance • Some parasites elicit an immune response from the host, then coat themselves with host proteins before the immune response is fully mobilized: • initial immune response by host may benefit the host later when challenged by related parasites in a phenomenon known as cross-resistance • Once an immune response has been elicited, antibodies can persist for a long time, preventing reinfection.

  36. Plants have antiherbivore defenses. • Plant-herbivore “warfare” is waged primarily through biochemical means. • Full spectrum of plant defenses includes: • low nutritional content of plant tissues • toxic compounds synthesized by the plants • structural defenses: • spines and hairs • tough seed coats • sticky gums and resins

  37. Spines protect the stems and leaves (a) cholla cactus and (b) prickly pear cactus

  38. Digestibility • Animals typically select plant food according to its nutrient content: • especially important to young animals, which have high demands for protein • Some plants deploy compounds that limit the digestibility of their tissues: • tannins produced by oaks and other plants interfere with the digestion of proteins • some animals can overcome the effect of tannins through production of digestive dispersal agents

  39. Secondary Compounds • Secondary compounds are produced by plants for purposes (typically defensive) other than metabolism. • Such compounds can be divided into three major classes: • nitrogen compounds (lignin, alkaloids, nonprotein amino acids, cyanogenic glycosides) • terpenoids (essential oils, latex, plant resins) • phenolics (simple phenols)

  40. Induced and Constitutive Defenses • Constitutive chemical defenses are maintained at high levels in the plant at all times. • Induced chemical defenses increase dramatically following an attack: • suggests that some chemicals are too expensive to maintain under light grazing pressure • plant responses to herbivory can reduce subsequent herbivory

  41. Herbivores control some plant populations. • Examples of control of introduced plant pests by herbivores provides evidence that herbivory can limit plant populations: • prickly pear cactus in Australia • controlled by introduction of a moth, Cactoblastis • Klamath weed in California • controlled by introduction of a beetle, Chrysolina

  42. Effects of Grazers and Browsers on Vegetation • Herbivores consume 30-60% of aboveground vegetation in grasslands: • demonstrated by use of exclosures limiting access to vegetation by herbivores • Occasional outbreaks of tent caterpillars, gypsy moths, and other insects can result in complete defoliation of forest trees.

  43. Summary 1 • Among consumers, ecologists recognize predators, parasitoids, and parasites. • Predator-prey relative sizes may vary dramatically. • Predators are well-adapted to capturing prey. • Prey avoid predation by avoiding detection and by means of chemical, structural, and behavioral defenses.

  44. Summary 2 • Batesian mimicry involves an unpalatable model and palatable host. • Müllerian mimicry complexes involve two or more unpalatable species that resemble one another. • Parasites have unique adaptations for their way of life. • Parasites and hosts remain in a delicate balance.

  45. Summary 3 • Plants use structural and chemical defenses to deter herbivores. • Some herbivores can detoxify secondary plant compounds, enabling them to consume otherwise toxic species. • Herbivores may control populations of plants at levels far below their sizes in the absence of specialized consumers.

More Related