1 / 16

Commissioners’ and Managers’ Survey

Commissioners’ and Managers’ Survey. Vision Team, J. C. Raulston Arboretum February 18, 2014. Responses – 179 Total. Commissioners : 132 (74%) Managers : 40 (22%) Other : 7 (4%). County Populatio n. < 25,000 : 42 25,001-50,000 : 41 50,001-100,000 : 44 > 100,000 : 52. Economics.

mrinal
Download Presentation

Commissioners’ and Managers’ Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Commissioners’ and Managers’ Survey Vision Team, J. C. Raulston Arboretum February 18, 2014

  2. Responses – 179 Total • Commissioners : 132 (74%) • Managers : 40 (22%) • Other : 7 (4%)

  3. County Population • < 25,000 : 42 • 25,001-50,000 : 41 • 50,001-100,000 : 44 • > 100,000 : 52

  4. Economics • Tier Ratings: 1 (Lowest), 3 (Best) • Tier 1:40 Counties-77 replies • Tier 2:40 Counties- 65 replies • Tier 3:20 Counties- 37 replies

  5. Q4: Must Continue • Agriculture- 115 • 4-H/Youth- 32 • Horticulture/ Master Gardeners- 32 • Consumer Horticulture- 8 • Natural Resources- 7 • Food Safety- 7 • General FCS- 6 • Health Nutrition- 3 • Community Development-3 • All programs currently offered- 3

  6. Q7 : Stop Doing • Stop no programs- 29 • Do not know- 16 • No answer, blank- 12 • FCS programs-7 • Replicated Health/Social Services programs- 2 • Master Gardeners-2 • All non-agriculture related-2 • Agriculture- 1 • All replications-1

  7. Q8: Important to have CED 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) 1 – 8 2 – 2 3 – 4 4 – 5 5 – 6 6 – 8 7 – 53 Rating Average 5.73

  8. Q9: Acceptable to share CED • Same scale 1 – 30 2 – 9 3 – 9 4 – 11 5 – 8 6 – 6 7 – 13 Rating Average 3.33

  9. Q10: Excellent ROI • Same scale 1 – 4 2 – 5 3 – 5 4 – 7 5 – 9 6 – 21 7 – 35 Rating Average 5.50

  10. Strategies: Meet lower budget

  11. Summary • Representative responses • Must focus on Agriculture, 4-H • No clear guidance on what to stop • Prefer having own CED • Excellent return on investment • Would fund with neighbor county • User fees acceptable

  12. County Salaries by Source • Total $ 27,285,085.62 % of Total • State $ 13,310,283.06 0.4878 • County $ 12,660,463.06 0.4640 • NC A&T $ 247,312.39 0.0091 • Grants $ 157,930.68 0.0058 • Fnds $ 22,814.70 0.0008 • EFNEP $ 886,281.73 0.0325

  13. County Operations Staffing CEDs 87 Agents 305 Program Assts. & Misc. 99 Admins 177 Total Staff 668

  14. Program Area Staffing AG 4-H FCS CRD CEDs 25 2 9 56 Agents 149 81 42 2 Program Asst. 0 18 49 0 Program Assoc. 0 9 11 0 Technicians 10 0 0 0 Total 184 110 111 58

  15. Salary Range Title High Low Avg. CED 89,756 50,000 68,901 Area Spec. Agent 78,768 52,387 64,251 Area Assoc Spec. 54,065 54,065 54,065 Area Asst. Spec. 46,290 46,290 46,290 Area Agent 69,280 55,640 62,745 Assoc Area Agent 55,557 43,833 48,743 Asst. Area Agent 51,122 34,800 39,358

  16. Salary Range Title High Low Avg. Agent 79,134 39,944 58,893 Assoc. Agent 68,223 36,225 47,449 Asst. Agent 60,909 33,500 39,921

More Related