panel ii efficient court administration l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Panel II Efficient Court Administration PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Panel II Efficient Court Administration

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 10
mort

Panel II Efficient Court Administration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

135 Views
Download Presentation
Panel II Efficient Court Administration
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. SURVEY Commercial Enforcement and Insolvency Systems Panel II Efficient Court Administration Legal Vice Presidency The World Bank

  2. Routine Liquidation 00-18 months 0% Longer than 30 months 44% 18-30 months 56%

  3. Routine Rehabilitation Longer 49% 00-18 Months 38% 18-30 Months 13%

  4. Factors in selection process 100% 0% 0% 1. Educational Level 70% 30% 0% 2. Legal Experience 70% 20% 10% 3. Legal Competence 60% 40% 0% 4. Character and Integrity 60% 0% 40% 5. Minimum Age 50% 40% 10% 6. Judicial Experience 0% 20% 80% 7. Contribution to Community 0% 20% 80% 8. Political Standing 0% 10% 90% 9. Business Experience 0% 0% 100% 10. Diversity 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Always Sometimes Never

  5. Attendance to Continuing Education • 27 % Often • 27 % Sometimes • 46 % Never

  6. Appointment of Judges • 100% judges are guaranteed security of tenure during their term of appointment • 18% there is a probationary period before final appointment • 55% there is a mandatory retirement age • 91% there is a legally established mechanism for dismissal • 100% there are accountability mechanisms for judges

  7. Review of Judicial Performance no regular review 18% regular review Regular review conducted by 82% 90% 89% 80% 70% 60% 50% 33% 40% 30% 11% 11% 11% 20% 10% 0% 0% Government Other Bar Association Private Public Other body Judges/judicial or attorneys Organization(s) Organization(s) bodies

  8. Public perception ofcourt competence 70% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Excellent Good Mediocre Bad Excellent Good Mediocre Bad

  9. Consistent interpretation of insolvency laws Infrequently Sometimes 9% 9% Frequently 82%

  10. Enforcement ofInsolvency Laws • 91% general perception that courts are willing to enforce insolvency laws