1 / 24

Ware Elementary

Ware Elementary. Report to the Board Date May 2014. School Improvement Process . SITE COUNCIL MEMBERS Alicia Scofield , Jared Larson- Co- Chairs

morpheus-zephyr
Download Presentation

Ware Elementary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ware Elementary Report to the Board Date May 2014

  2. School Improvement Process SITE COUNCIL MEMBERS Alicia Scofield , Jared Larson- Co-Chairs Michaela Larson, Deb Gustafson, Dana Williamson, Nancy Norris, Kathy Sheffield, Melanie Gray, Tiffany Kelsay, Lynn Kruse, Erica Flenoury, Tonia Horton, Veronica Wait, Lindsay Lokodi, Erin Taylor, Jamie Deville, Sharon Harrison, Jennifer Black,  Amy Madetzke,  Jenny Harper, Melanie Gray, Kathy Sheffield SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT MEMBERS All Certified Staff Members SIP and Site Council meet monthly for regular meetings. MTSS is part of the SIP process.

  3. School Demographics Free & Reduced 75% ESS 10% African American 13% Hispanic 19% White 52%

  4. Reading Goals API increase by 5 points to 677 • State assessment data • Formative assessment data – SRI Reduce Non Proficient by .48 • State assessment data • Formative assessment data-SRI

  5. Strategies for Supporting Goals Kindercorner strategies • Learning Labs to increase vocabulary development • Placement of students in Roots if achieving passing ROOTS assessment. Roots strategies • Aggressive placement of students • Reading Counts assessment • SRI assessments once passed story 48. • Cooperative Learning Wings strategies • Aggressive placement of students • Reading Counts assessment • Cooperative Learning • Posting objectives and goals

  6. 2013 Reading Achievement by Performance Groups

  7. 2012 Reading Achievement by Performance Groups

  8. READING AMO Progress Categories One area must be achieved for accreditation.

  9. 2013 Reading API Comparison

  10. Building’s Median Student Growth Percentile: Reading: 53

  11. Math Goals API increase by 5 points to 729 • State assessment data • Formative assessment data – Unit assessments • SMI for lowest 20% Reduce Non Proficient by .18 • State assessment data • Formative assessment data – Unit assessments • SMI for lowest 20%

  12. Share your strategies for supporting your goals Implementation of district common core strategies as outlined by the grade level task force. Depth of knowledge questions. Increase student explanation of math answers. Multi-step math problems.

  13. 2013 Math Achievement by Performance Groups

  14. 2012 Math Achievement by Performance Groups

  15. MATH AMO Progress Categories One area must be achieved for accreditation.

  16. 2013 Math API Comparison

  17. Building’s Median Student Growth Percentile: Math: 53%

  18. Met/Not Met Summary Ware Elementary met their AMO in the area of growth in reading and math. Hispanic students met AMO in RNP.

More Related